<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good news for the UK, bad news for Japan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/12/11/good-news-for-the-uk-bad-news-for-japan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/12/11/good-news-for-the-uk-bad-news-for-japan/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=good-news-for-the-uk-bad-news-for-japan</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark M</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/12/11/good-news-for-the-uk-bad-news-for-japan/#comment-277491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mark M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 20:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2851#comment-277491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a  UK Space Fan I am reserving judgement until it is clear that substantial new money is being put in, or is it just a re-branding exercise ?
I would add that in the Parliamentary Select Committee on Science and Technology (Seventh report) it states that &quot;If current levels of expenditure in space persist, the Government should not establish a space agency&quot;.  Fingers crossed for more cash.

Mark M]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a  UK Space Fan I am reserving judgement until it is clear that substantial new money is being put in, or is it just a re-branding exercise ?<br />
I would add that in the Parliamentary Select Committee on Science and Technology (Seventh report) it states that &#8220;If current levels of expenditure in space persist, the Government should not establish a space agency&#8221;.  Fingers crossed for more cash.</p>
<p>Mark M</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2009/12/11/good-news-for-the-uk-bad-news-for-japan/#comment-277463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 13:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=2851#comment-277463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My wife and I are going through the delightful &quot;Yes Minister&quot; series (as well as Spooks from the start)...somehow I am having a smile this morning thinking of &quot;Jim Hacker MP&quot; taking over the new agency...with Sir Humphrey moving over to permanent under secretary.  Bernard of course would join them.

Yes minister

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife and I are going through the delightful &#8220;Yes Minister&#8221; series (as well as Spooks from the start)&#8230;somehow I am having a smile this morning thinking of &#8220;Jim Hacker MP&#8221; taking over the new agency&#8230;with Sir Humphrey moving over to permanent under secretary.  Bernard of course would join them.</p>
<p>Yes minister</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
