<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Posey: reported Obama plan &#8220;a giant leap backwards&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 15:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Many of the heavy communications satellites in orbit were launched by the Space Shuttle, a human spaceflight program.&quot;

Many?  There are hundreds of active comsats in orbit (and hundreds more that have been deactivated).  Shuttle launched maybe a dozen comsats before Challenger.

&quot;The miniturization of electronics that would eventually lead to devices like the ipod were a direct result of the Apollo, gemini, and Mercury programs.&quot;

No they weren&#039;t.  Electronics miniaturization was driven by ICBMs and the push to fit as many lightweight warheads on a single missile as possible.  NASA leveraged that (and other ICBM technologies) in Apollo, but NASA didn&#039;t drive it.

&quot;There is no greater technological endevor [sic] humans partake in than manned spaceflight.&quot;

Says who?  A lot of AI researchers, biomedical engineers, etc. would disagree with you.

&quot;... no U.S human spaceflight means even less children will be enspired to persue careers in Math, Science, and Engineering, skills our nation desperately lacks.&quot;

If we need more students to pursue STEM degrees and careers, then we should just directly incentivize them via scholarships.  It would be orders of magnitude cheaper than spending hundreds of billions of dollars on human space exploration in the hope that it indirectly inspires some kids.

&quot;Obama is cancelling U.S spaceflight for chump change,&quot;

How is adding $1.3B annually to the NASA budget &quot;cancelling U.S. spaceflight for chump change&quot;?

Goofy...

&quot;neglecting the damage such a decision could cause in the future for petty short term political gain.&quot;

What political gain is there to cancelling a highly visible national symbol?

Weird...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many of the heavy communications satellites in orbit were launched by the Space Shuttle, a human spaceflight program.&#8221;</p>
<p>Many?  There are hundreds of active comsats in orbit (and hundreds more that have been deactivated).  Shuttle launched maybe a dozen comsats before Challenger.</p>
<p>&#8220;The miniturization of electronics that would eventually lead to devices like the ipod were a direct result of the Apollo, gemini, and Mercury programs.&#8221;</p>
<p>No they weren&#8217;t.  Electronics miniaturization was driven by ICBMs and the push to fit as many lightweight warheads on a single missile as possible.  NASA leveraged that (and other ICBM technologies) in Apollo, but NASA didn&#8217;t drive it.</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no greater technological endevor [sic] humans partake in than manned spaceflight.&#8221;</p>
<p>Says who?  A lot of AI researchers, biomedical engineers, etc. would disagree with you.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230; no U.S human spaceflight means even less children will be enspired to persue careers in Math, Science, and Engineering, skills our nation desperately lacks.&#8221;</p>
<p>If we need more students to pursue STEM degrees and careers, then we should just directly incentivize them via scholarships.  It would be orders of magnitude cheaper than spending hundreds of billions of dollars on human space exploration in the hope that it indirectly inspires some kids.</p>
<p>&#8220;Obama is cancelling U.S spaceflight for chump change,&#8221;</p>
<p>How is adding $1.3B annually to the NASA budget &#8220;cancelling U.S. spaceflight for chump change&#8221;?</p>
<p>Goofy&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;neglecting the damage such a decision could cause in the future for petty short term political gain.&#8221;</p>
<p>What political gain is there to cancelling a highly visible national symbol?</p>
<p>Weird&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatC</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281835</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PatC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 06:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281835</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Robert

Many of the heavy communications satellites in orbit were launched by the Space Shuttle, a human spaceflight program. 

The miniturization of electronics that would eventually lead to devices like the ipod were a direct result of the Apollo, gemini, and Mercury programs. 

The first practical hydrogen fuel cells were created during the Gemini/Apollo programs. 

I could go on, but the point is this. There is no greater technological endevor humans partake in than manned spaceflight. By pushing our technological limits, we can invent and discover new and revolutionary technologies which we never thought possible. Ending manned U.S spaceflight will not only damage national pride, but also deprive the United States of the technological superiority we now are barely hanging on to. Worse, no U.S human spaceflight means even less children will be enspired to persue careers in Math, Science, and Engineering, skills our nation desperately lacks. Obama is cancelling U.S spaceflight for chump change,neglecting the damage such a decision could cause in the future for petty short term political gain.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert</p>
<p>Many of the heavy communications satellites in orbit were launched by the Space Shuttle, a human spaceflight program. </p>
<p>The miniturization of electronics that would eventually lead to devices like the ipod were a direct result of the Apollo, gemini, and Mercury programs. </p>
<p>The first practical hydrogen fuel cells were created during the Gemini/Apollo programs. </p>
<p>I could go on, but the point is this. There is no greater technological endevor humans partake in than manned spaceflight. By pushing our technological limits, we can invent and discover new and revolutionary technologies which we never thought possible. Ending manned U.S spaceflight will not only damage national pride, but also deprive the United States of the technological superiority we now are barely hanging on to. Worse, no U.S human spaceflight means even less children will be enspired to persue careers in Math, Science, and Engineering, skills our nation desperately lacks. Obama is cancelling U.S spaceflight for chump change,neglecting the damage such a decision could cause in the future for petty short term political gain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Patrick wrote @ January 27th, 2010 at 8:58 pm

Robert, as I type this on my iPhone and this is bounced off a satalite I can not think of a single thing the space program has done for progress or productivity...

did any of those things have to do with human spaceflight

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick wrote @ January 27th, 2010 at 8:58 pm</p>
<p>Robert, as I type this on my iPhone and this is bounced off a satalite I can not think of a single thing the space program has done for progress or productivity&#8230;</p>
<p>did any of those things have to do with human spaceflight</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281805</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 04:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281805</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Davenport wrote @ January 27th, 2010 at 8:06 pm

Bolden is a capable leaderâ€¦

Heâ€™s another leading example of an Affirmative Action chair warmer. ...

racist

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David Davenport wrote @ January 27th, 2010 at 8:06 pm</p>
<p>Bolden is a capable leaderâ€¦</p>
<p>Heâ€™s another leading example of an Affirmative Action chair warmer. &#8230;</p>
<p>racist</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281791</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281791</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Heâ€™s another leading example of an Affirmative Action chair warmer. 

Gen. Bolden is capable in that role, yessir.&quot;

This is a space policy forum.  If you have racially charged issues with human resources policies, take them elsewhere.

Ugh...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Heâ€™s another leading example of an Affirmative Action chair warmer. </p>
<p>Gen. Bolden is capable in that role, yessir.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is a space policy forum.  If you have racially charged issues with human resources policies, take them elsewhere.</p>
<p>Ugh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 03:17:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Thereâ€™s already commercial lift to space, its called Energia!&quot;

Energia production ended with the fall of the Soviet Union.  There is no Energia, commercial or otherwise, and there hasn&#039;t been for almost a couple decades now.

FWIW...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thereâ€™s already commercial lift to space, its called Energia!&#8221;</p>
<p>Energia production ended with the fall of the Soviet Union.  There is no Energia, commercial or otherwise, and there hasn&#8217;t been for almost a couple decades now.</p>
<p>FWIW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281764</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281764</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert, as I type this on my iPhone and this is bounced off a satalite I can not think of a single thing the space program has done for progress or productivity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, as I type this on my iPhone and this is bounced off a satalite I can not think of a single thing the space program has done for progress or productivity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281762</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so depressing.  I guess not enough union jobs to shill for.  Is there any doubt left that the wrong guy got elected.  And I don&#039;t mean this to say McCain wa the right guy,  but does anybody actually believe that a former engineering student and fighter pilot would have killed our human space flight program?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so depressing.  I guess not enough union jobs to shill for.  Is there any doubt left that the wrong guy got elected.  And I don&#8217;t mean this to say McCain wa the right guy,  but does anybody actually believe that a former engineering student and fighter pilot would have killed our human space flight program?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Davenport</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Davenport]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt; Bolden is a capable leaderâ€¦&lt;/i&gt;

He&#039;s another leading example of an Affirmative Action chair warmer. 

Gen. Bolden is capable in that role, yessir.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Bolden is a capable leaderâ€¦</i></p>
<p>He&#8217;s another leading example of an Affirmative Action chair warmer. </p>
<p>Gen. Bolden is capable in that role, yessir.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/01/27/posey-reported-obama-plan-a-giant-leap-backwards/#comment-281752</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3017#comment-281752</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcel F. Williams wrote @ January 27th, 2010 at 7:52 pm

Thereâ€™s already commercial lift to space, its called Energia!

It is not American commercial space...and I dont give a darn about anyone else 

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcel F. Williams wrote @ January 27th, 2010 at 7:52 pm</p>
<p>Thereâ€™s already commercial lift to space, its called Energia!</p>
<p>It is not American commercial space&#8230;and I dont give a darn about anyone else </p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
