<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increased funding in India; a new budget coming in Canada</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/04/increased-funding-in-india-a-new-budget-coming-in-canada/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/04/increased-funding-in-india-a-new-budget-coming-in-canada/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=increased-funding-in-india-a-new-budget-coming-in-canada</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/04/increased-funding-in-india-a-new-budget-coming-in-canada/#comment-288322</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 04:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3176#comment-288322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting to compare the ISRO budget against NASA&#039;s early budgets.  For example, ISRO&#039;s $680 million last year and $1 billion this year versus the $490 million that NASA received in 1958 and $1.8 billion that NASA received in 1959 (in today&#039;s dollars).

It&#039;s also interesting that the ISRO budget is going up $319 million but only a tenth of that is going to the new human space flight effort.

ISRO&#039;s budget is growing like NASA&#039;s early budget, but not nearly as much of ISRO&#039;s budget is going to human space flight.  If the trends continue, ISRO will grow some impressive capabilities, but not in human space flight.

FWIW...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting to compare the ISRO budget against NASA&#8217;s early budgets.  For example, ISRO&#8217;s $680 million last year and $1 billion this year versus the $490 million that NASA received in 1958 and $1.8 billion that NASA received in 1959 (in today&#8217;s dollars).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also interesting that the ISRO budget is going up $319 million but only a tenth of that is going to the new human space flight effort.</p>
<p>ISRO&#8217;s budget is growing like NASA&#8217;s early budget, but not nearly as much of ISRO&#8217;s budget is going to human space flight.  If the trends continue, ISRO will grow some impressive capabilities, but not in human space flight.</p>
<p>FWIW&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nachrichten aus der Raumfahrt kompakt &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/04/increased-funding-in-india-a-new-budget-coming-in-canada/#comment-288294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nachrichten aus der Raumfahrt kompakt &#171; Skyweek Zwei Punkt Null]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 23:15:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3176#comment-288294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Sonnensatelliten Aditya. (PTI, Sify 26., Times of India, Domain B 27.2., PTI 1., India Today 3., Space Politics [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Sonnensatelliten Aditya. (PTI, Sify 26., Times of India, Domain B 27.2., PTI 1., India Today 3., Space Politics [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
