<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Constellation, solid rocket motors, and the military</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Church</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-307601</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Church]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-307601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;a heavy lift vehicle that is capable of going beyond LEO, but constrained to using much of Shuttle existing technology, is kind of like taking a 1970s VW bus and trying to make a 2010 Escalade.&quot;

You are wrong; chemicals only produce so much energy and alloys only take so much heat. It is why steam turbines do not put out any more power than they did a century ago. The SSME&#039;s and SRB&#039;s are awesome machines with no competitors today or in the near future. The RS-68 is pretty awesome- cheap and expendable, but it has an inferior ISP to the SSME.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a heavy lift vehicle that is capable of going beyond LEO, but constrained to using much of Shuttle existing technology, is kind of like taking a 1970s VW bus and trying to make a 2010 Escalade.&#8221;</p>
<p>You are wrong; chemicals only produce so much energy and alloys only take so much heat. It is why steam turbines do not put out any more power than they did a century ago. The SSME&#8217;s and SRB&#8217;s are awesome machines with no competitors today or in the near future. The RS-68 is pretty awesome- cheap and expendable, but it has an inferior ISP to the SSME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Church</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-307600</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gary Church]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 00:30:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-307600</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;they have a vehicle on the pad, and a prototype capsule ready to laounch in a few weeks.&quot;

Clusters last stand? You have to be joking. It is about as real as the AresI test flight. At least they have tested the escape system for Orion. The &quot;dragon&quot; does not even have one yet. And you can&#039;t pull a system like that out of your butt. Falcon will never put a human being in orbit- and it will be lucky to even put satellites up before going into chapter 11. It is a joke.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;they have a vehicle on the pad, and a prototype capsule ready to laounch in a few weeks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Clusters last stand? You have to be joking. It is about as real as the AresI test flight. At least they have tested the escape system for Orion. The &#8220;dragon&#8221; does not even have one yet. And you can&#8217;t pull a system like that out of your butt. Falcon will never put a human being in orbit- and it will be lucky to even put satellites up before going into chapter 11. It is a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; HASC and Constellation</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-307037</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; HASC and Constellation]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 18:41:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-307037</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Another question is the claim in the report that propulsion systems costs &#8220;could increase from 40 to 100 percent&#8221; because of Constellation&#8217;s cancellation. The HASC report cites unnamed &#8220;defense officials&#8221;, but back in March Rear Admiral Stephen E. Johnson, director of strategic systems programs for the Navy, told a Senate committee that he expected DOD costs to increase by only 10-20 percent. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another question is the claim in the report that propulsion systems costs &#8220;could increase from 40 to 100 percent&#8221; because of Constellation&#8217;s cancellation. The HASC report cites unnamed &#8220;defense officials&#8221;, but back in March Rear Admiral Stephen E. Johnson, director of strategic systems programs for the Navy, told a Senate committee that he expected DOD costs to increase by only 10-20 percent. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave C.</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291317</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dave C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the DOD decides that solid rockets need refurbishing, why would they rely on NASA to bring the project in on budget and schedule (or even at allâ€¦since this isnâ€™t really in their best interest?)  NASAâ€™s Project Managers have been left to free range for too long.  The fact that we are even having a discussion about extending Shuttle in 2010 shows you how far off the range the Shuttle PM has wandered.   With all of his contractors ready to start back up production, it makes one wonder what he has been spending the Shuttle retirement money on.

And requiring Constellation to develop a heavy lift vehicle that is capable of going beyond LEO, but constrained to using much of Shuttle existing technology, is kind of like taking a 1970s VW bus and trying to make a 2010 Escalade.  NASA needs new technology, and it wonâ€™t be developed if it is stuck gluing together old Shuttle parts.  Unfortunately, none of this will matter if the PMs continue to be held to a much lower set of standards than say your average NASA employee.  Todayâ€™s NASA senior managers lack the essential leadership qualities that are required to successfully manage projects of this magnitude; most notable is the lack of integrity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the DOD decides that solid rockets need refurbishing, why would they rely on NASA to bring the project in on budget and schedule (or even at allâ€¦since this isnâ€™t really in their best interest?)  NASAâ€™s Project Managers have been left to free range for too long.  The fact that we are even having a discussion about extending Shuttle in 2010 shows you how far off the range the Shuttle PM has wandered.   With all of his contractors ready to start back up production, it makes one wonder what he has been spending the Shuttle retirement money on.</p>
<p>And requiring Constellation to develop a heavy lift vehicle that is capable of going beyond LEO, but constrained to using much of Shuttle existing technology, is kind of like taking a 1970s VW bus and trying to make a 2010 Escalade.  NASA needs new technology, and it wonâ€™t be developed if it is stuck gluing together old Shuttle parts.  Unfortunately, none of this will matter if the PMs continue to be held to a much lower set of standards than say your average NASA employee.  Todayâ€™s NASA senior managers lack the essential leadership qualities that are required to successfully manage projects of this magnitude; most notable is the lack of integrity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291269</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291269</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;As for Constellation, it could be a sink hole of funds. But so could SpaceX and others. SpaceX has established a record of over promising and being late. Like most aerospace primes over the past 2 or 3 decades.&lt;/em&gt;

Let&#039;s see...

Ares/Orion have consumed almost ten billion bucks so far, and all they have to show for it is a test flight that cost about as much as all of SpaceX&#039; development costs to date (about five percent of that amount), and they have a vehicle on the pad, and a prototype capsule ready to laounch in a few weeks.

So what&#039;s that again...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>As for Constellation, it could be a sink hole of funds. But so could SpaceX and others. SpaceX has established a record of over promising and being late. Like most aerospace primes over the past 2 or 3 decades.</em></p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230;</p>
<p>Ares/Orion have consumed almost ten billion bucks so far, and all they have to show for it is a test flight that cost about as much as all of SpaceX&#8217; development costs to date (about five percent of that amount), and they have a vehicle on the pad, and a prototype capsule ready to laounch in a few weeks.</p>
<p>So what&#8217;s that again&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291259</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:49:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291259</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richardb wrote @ March 20th, 2010 at 9:40 pm

three points (and try and end on space)

First the NBC/WSJ poll is one of the best in the business.  The fact of bailout money eetc doesnt have a thing to do with the validity of the poll...and what that poll is saying tracks almost all other polls.

Second.  The GOP really hosed themselves in this debate...it is a product of the Fox News echo room.  The folks who were already against the bill were &quot;alarmed&quot; at the process; they dont know history, they dont understand that this is the calling card of legislation in  The Republic dating back to the 1st Congress...

Process means little once the bill passes.  What the GOP should have argued (and it is a valid concern) is &quot;how much it cost&quot;.  With this vote we will be well on the road to single payer and that is going to change the dynamics of taxation in  The Republic (ie they are going up) ...but the flip side is that these programs are extremely popular in all the countries that have them.  The GOP used the same language against social security and medicare/caid and those are very popular programs now...the GOP would not even think of repealling them.

If they want to campaign in 10 on &quot;repeal the bill&quot; go ahead.  They would have no chance to even if they owned the Senate/House (they wont have a override majority) AND the Dems with any smart campaigning can cruicify them (&quot;You want to repeal the law that says &#039;no preexisting conditions&#039;?&quot;)

The GOP has no plan for America to go into this century and reform its institutions...none all it has is a very loud (and large) minority of older white very angry voters that are turning off the &quot;middle&quot; of American politics and almost every minority block in site.

That includes human spaceflight.  If (and I now think he will) Obama wins this, he is going to have a working majority in both houses of Congress who are attached to him at the hip...ie they need him to survive...and that will include the votes on the (nationally) trivial issues of human spaceflight.

Obama will hammer the &quot;new economy&quot; part of human spaceflight and the American people and the non pork space Congress will be fine with that.

Very shortly the &quot;exploration&quot; crowd is going to be old.

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richardb wrote @ March 20th, 2010 at 9:40 pm</p>
<p>three points (and try and end on space)</p>
<p>First the NBC/WSJ poll is one of the best in the business.  The fact of bailout money eetc doesnt have a thing to do with the validity of the poll&#8230;and what that poll is saying tracks almost all other polls.</p>
<p>Second.  The GOP really hosed themselves in this debate&#8230;it is a product of the Fox News echo room.  The folks who were already against the bill were &#8220;alarmed&#8221; at the process; they dont know history, they dont understand that this is the calling card of legislation in  The Republic dating back to the 1st Congress&#8230;</p>
<p>Process means little once the bill passes.  What the GOP should have argued (and it is a valid concern) is &#8220;how much it cost&#8221;.  With this vote we will be well on the road to single payer and that is going to change the dynamics of taxation in  The Republic (ie they are going up) &#8230;but the flip side is that these programs are extremely popular in all the countries that have them.  The GOP used the same language against social security and medicare/caid and those are very popular programs now&#8230;the GOP would not even think of repealling them.</p>
<p>If they want to campaign in 10 on &#8220;repeal the bill&#8221; go ahead.  They would have no chance to even if they owned the Senate/House (they wont have a override majority) AND the Dems with any smart campaigning can cruicify them (&#8220;You want to repeal the law that says &#8216;no preexisting conditions&#8217;?&#8221;)</p>
<p>The GOP has no plan for America to go into this century and reform its institutions&#8230;none all it has is a very loud (and large) minority of older white very angry voters that are turning off the &#8220;middle&#8221; of American politics and almost every minority block in site.</p>
<p>That includes human spaceflight.  If (and I now think he will) Obama wins this, he is going to have a working majority in both houses of Congress who are attached to him at the hip&#8230;ie they need him to survive&#8230;and that will include the votes on the (nationally) trivial issues of human spaceflight.</p>
<p>Obama will hammer the &#8220;new economy&#8221; part of human spaceflight and the American people and the non pork space Congress will be fine with that.</p>
<p>Very shortly the &#8220;exploration&#8221; crowd is going to be old.</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardb</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291242</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 01:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291242</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert G, ya didn&#039;t read what I said did you?  I said this &quot; The shocking thing about these trends is how hated the GOP was in 2008, yet here we are Dems sinking down to the GOP levels.&quot;
Yes the GOP does suck.  But the Dems have double downed on the GOP, haven&#039;t they?  
About that NBC poll, what if some entity that gets billions from the USG, some entity like GM, put out a poll claiming that most people think the bailout of GM was a good thing.   Would you be skeptical of that poll?  I would.  The fact NBC received over 100 BILLION from the USG in the form of bailout funds to its parent forces me to be skeptical.  Plus many other polls with excellent track records show the trends against Obama and the Dems.  You seem comfortable with polls from companies bought and paid for by the USG.  I&#039;m not.

As for the Space angle,  Obama will be a deeply wounded president either way this HC works out.  If it fails, he looks like a fool.  If it passes he looks like the bill.  Full of dirty deals, expensive beyond imagination with the entire summer for the mess to be exposed.    Congress then has to deal with other Obama initiatives such as Nasa.  Killing jobs is a loser in Congress.  Those folks will want to distance themselves from Obama and Nasa is a cheap way to start.   

Rand, do you really believe Shuttle is a dead end program?  It might be the only thing keeping the ISS in stable orbit a year from now.  Things break on orbit.  
As for Constellation,  it could be a sink hole of funds.  But so could SpaceX and others.  SpaceX has established a record of over promising and being late.  Like most aerospace primes over the past 2 or 3 decades.

Rober G, I&#039;m curious why you think the Dems will be fine if the HC passes given the billions in payoffs for votes.  Given the phony accounting to justify it such as excluding the Doc Fix and the states higher expenses for Medicad costs the feds are pushing down to them.  Isn&#039;t under estimating the costs one of the prime failures of Nasa?  Yet the HC fiasco will be 2 or 3 orders of magnitude more costly than anything Nasa has pulled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert G, ya didn&#8217;t read what I said did you?  I said this &#8221; The shocking thing about these trends is how hated the GOP was in 2008, yet here we are Dems sinking down to the GOP levels.&#8221;<br />
Yes the GOP does suck.  But the Dems have double downed on the GOP, haven&#8217;t they?<br />
About that NBC poll, what if some entity that gets billions from the USG, some entity like GM, put out a poll claiming that most people think the bailout of GM was a good thing.   Would you be skeptical of that poll?  I would.  The fact NBC received over 100 BILLION from the USG in the form of bailout funds to its parent forces me to be skeptical.  Plus many other polls with excellent track records show the trends against Obama and the Dems.  You seem comfortable with polls from companies bought and paid for by the USG.  I&#8217;m not.</p>
<p>As for the Space angle,  Obama will be a deeply wounded president either way this HC works out.  If it fails, he looks like a fool.  If it passes he looks like the bill.  Full of dirty deals, expensive beyond imagination with the entire summer for the mess to be exposed.    Congress then has to deal with other Obama initiatives such as Nasa.  Killing jobs is a loser in Congress.  Those folks will want to distance themselves from Obama and Nasa is a cheap way to start.   </p>
<p>Rand, do you really believe Shuttle is a dead end program?  It might be the only thing keeping the ISS in stable orbit a year from now.  Things break on orbit.<br />
As for Constellation,  it could be a sink hole of funds.  But so could SpaceX and others.  SpaceX has established a record of over promising and being late.  Like most aerospace primes over the past 2 or 3 decades.</p>
<p>Rober G, I&#8217;m curious why you think the Dems will be fine if the HC passes given the billions in payoffs for votes.  Given the phony accounting to justify it such as excluding the Doc Fix and the states higher expenses for Medicad costs the feds are pushing down to them.  Isn&#8217;t under estimating the costs one of the prime failures of Nasa?  Yet the HC fiasco will be 2 or 3 orders of magnitude more costly than anything Nasa has pulled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291214</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 20:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[richardb wrote @ March 20th, 2010 at 3:01 pm 

well maybe but I doubt it

what you dont seem to grasp is that THE GOP IS STILL PRETTY MUCH DISLIKED.

MOST of the people blame the GOP and the current GOP leadership for the mess we are in.  they are not clear as to where it is going right now...but there are signs that Obama and his &quot;Plans&quot; are gaining support...ie the break right now on the health care bill.

The GOP would, in my view be on the way to a pretty good sweep if it was not for the anchor of the far right and in particular the tea party people.  The latter have started to cross the line into serious &quot;nutty&quot; and the far right really is percieved as having no answers.

Generic polls only are useful if there is a generic dislike of one side and a &quot;like&quot; of the other...and the other side has a unified message.

You are free to think what you want, but I kind of sense your bias since you lay into the NBC poll.  The other half of that is THE WSJ which is owned by well go look it u p...and the poll is done for them by a group which is about the best in the business.  It is the gold standard of professional polling.

I dont look at them exclusively, but to claim &quot;its bought&quot; as you did is pretty lame.

As for space...we will see.  again I disagree.  but a lot of it depends on Obama getting his health care...he does that. he is bullet proof in the Congress

he will get what he wants  he will have put together a pretty solid working majority

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>richardb wrote @ March 20th, 2010 at 3:01 pm </p>
<p>well maybe but I doubt it</p>
<p>what you dont seem to grasp is that THE GOP IS STILL PRETTY MUCH DISLIKED.</p>
<p>MOST of the people blame the GOP and the current GOP leadership for the mess we are in.  they are not clear as to where it is going right now&#8230;but there are signs that Obama and his &#8220;Plans&#8221; are gaining support&#8230;ie the break right now on the health care bill.</p>
<p>The GOP would, in my view be on the way to a pretty good sweep if it was not for the anchor of the far right and in particular the tea party people.  The latter have started to cross the line into serious &#8220;nutty&#8221; and the far right really is percieved as having no answers.</p>
<p>Generic polls only are useful if there is a generic dislike of one side and a &#8220;like&#8221; of the other&#8230;and the other side has a unified message.</p>
<p>You are free to think what you want, but I kind of sense your bias since you lay into the NBC poll.  The other half of that is THE WSJ which is owned by well go look it u p&#8230;and the poll is done for them by a group which is about the best in the business.  It is the gold standard of professional polling.</p>
<p>I dont look at them exclusively, but to claim &#8220;its bought&#8221; as you did is pretty lame.</p>
<p>As for space&#8230;we will see.  again I disagree.  but a lot of it depends on Obama getting his health care&#8230;he does that. he is bullet proof in the Congress</p>
<p>he will get what he wants  he will have put together a pretty solid working majority</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291207</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Congress already has two programs of record, Shuttle and Constellation. They will fund them for 2011 to keep the employment picture from getting worse and Democratic prospects for re-election worse.&lt;/em&gt;

If so, that&#039;s another lost year, and further billions wasted on a dead-end program.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Congress already has two programs of record, Shuttle and Constellation. They will fund them for 2011 to keep the employment picture from getting worse and Democratic prospects for re-election worse.</em></p>
<p>If so, that&#8217;s another lost year, and further billions wasted on a dead-end program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: richardb</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/18/constellation-solid-rocket-motors-and-the-military/#comment-291201</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[richardb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3242#comment-291201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert G, 
Generic Dem/Rep does make a difference, it has foreshadowed shifts in party power for many years.   Polls like this motivate challengers to incumbents and the flow of money to challengers.  The shocking thing about these trends is how hated the GOP was in 2008, yet here we are Dems sinking down to the GOP levels.  Now more than ever Independents will write the story in 2010 and they are loudly singing GOP/Tea Party music at the moment.

NBC/WSJ is one poll and we all know that is never enough to understand the sense of the country. But NBC has a credibility problem.  The parent of NBC is GE and they got over 100 billion in bailout monies from the USG. 
Money talks.  

At any rate, many polls have trended  down for Dems over the last 12 months and it seems all major polls are now showing disapproval for Obama and Dems.  Trends require an inflection point to change direction.
What is likely to be an inflection point between now and November?

A major improvement in the new hiring across country.  Not likely at all.
Cheaper HC for all?  Laughable.
Cap and Tax?  Sure just what the voters are demanding.     
How about laying off 10&#039;s of thousands of  Nasa employees, contractors and suppliers?   

This alone could accelerate Democratic Party disapprovals in the affected states.  So I&#039;ll go way out on a limb and suggest that on this issue Congressional Democrats will believe Obama is on a suicide mission.   
Congress already has two programs of record, Shuttle and Constellation.  They will fund them for 2011 to keep the employment picture from getting worse and Democratic prospects for re-election worse.  Just as Congress has extended other POR&#039;s such as C-17 and JSF alternate engine they will extend the POR&#039;s Shuttle and Constellation.  I initially thought Congress would go along with Obama on cancellation, no more, for the reason above.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert G,<br />
Generic Dem/Rep does make a difference, it has foreshadowed shifts in party power for many years.   Polls like this motivate challengers to incumbents and the flow of money to challengers.  The shocking thing about these trends is how hated the GOP was in 2008, yet here we are Dems sinking down to the GOP levels.  Now more than ever Independents will write the story in 2010 and they are loudly singing GOP/Tea Party music at the moment.</p>
<p>NBC/WSJ is one poll and we all know that is never enough to understand the sense of the country. But NBC has a credibility problem.  The parent of NBC is GE and they got over 100 billion in bailout monies from the USG.<br />
Money talks.  </p>
<p>At any rate, many polls have trended  down for Dems over the last 12 months and it seems all major polls are now showing disapproval for Obama and Dems.  Trends require an inflection point to change direction.<br />
What is likely to be an inflection point between now and November?</p>
<p>A major improvement in the new hiring across country.  Not likely at all.<br />
Cheaper HC for all?  Laughable.<br />
Cap and Tax?  Sure just what the voters are demanding.<br />
How about laying off 10&#8217;s of thousands of  Nasa employees, contractors and suppliers?   </p>
<p>This alone could accelerate Democratic Party disapprovals in the affected states.  So I&#8217;ll go way out on a limb and suggest that on this issue Congressional Democrats will believe Obama is on a suicide mission.<br />
Congress already has two programs of record, Shuttle and Constellation.  They will fund them for 2011 to keep the employment picture from getting worse and Democratic prospects for re-election worse.  Just as Congress has extended other POR&#8217;s such as C-17 and JSF alternate engine they will extend the POR&#8217;s Shuttle and Constellation.  I initially thought Congress would go along with Obama on cancellation, no more, for the reason above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
