<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Multiple fronts and multiple obstacles to export control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/26/multiple-fronts-and-multiple-obstacles-to-export-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/26/multiple-fronts-and-multiple-obstacles-to-export-control/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=multiple-fronts-and-multiple-obstacles-to-export-control</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Export control, spaceport measures added to defense authorization bill</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/26/multiple-fronts-and-multiple-obstacles-to-export-control/#comment-368968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Export control, spaceport measures added to defense authorization bill]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2012 11:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3276#comment-368968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] not the first time that export control reform has made it through the House: the House included similar language in its State Department authorization act in 2009. That legislation died in the Senate, though. A companion provision (either in the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] not the first time that export control reform has made it through the House: the House included similar language in its State Department authorization act in 2009. That legislation died in the Senate, though. A companion provision (either in the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Another step forward for export control reform</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/03/26/multiple-fronts-and-multiple-obstacles-to-export-control/#comment-297665</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Another step forward for export control reform]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3276#comment-297665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and related components, for example, were once on the CCL but moved to the USML in the late 1990s; there&#8217;s legislation in Congress right now that would allow the president to remove them from t... (presumably back onto the CCL) if he so [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] and related components, for example, were once on the CCL but moved to the USML in the late 1990s; there&#8217;s legislation in Congress right now that would allow the president to remove them from t&#8230; (presumably back onto the CCL) if he so [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
