<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White House responds to Armstrong criticism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Obama Champions Private Enterprise in Space over Bipartisan Support for Socialist Space Program</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296900</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Obama Champions Private Enterprise in Space over Bipartisan Support for Socialist Space Program]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Apr 2010 19:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296900</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] white elephant known as &#8220;Ares I&#8221; rocket. (See Jeff Foust&#8217;s analysis here and here.)Â I was sorry to see the Administration decide to preserve the Orion capsule as a lifeboat for the [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] white elephant known as &#8220;Ares I&#8221; rocket. (See Jeff Foust&#8217;s analysis here and here.)Â I was sorry to see the Administration decide to preserve the Orion capsule as a lifeboat for the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEarl</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296178</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrEarl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your making assumptions Tom.
Has any of these people endorsed NASA&#039;s FY&#039;11 budget since it&#039;s been announced?
Your confusing silence for support.
I also agree with the part of supporting commercial cargo and crewed access to the ISS but I think his budget will make NASA just an R&amp;D agency and kill beyond LEO exploration for decades.
I know what he said today but you have to remember he&#039;s a politician and what they say and what they mean are usually two completely different things.  You should know that by now.

Lawdy.....  

I admit I didn&#039;t know Ride endorsed Obama for prez.  Lately I&#039;ve had my doubts on the impartiality of most of the members of that board and the conclusions they came up with.  It will be interesting to check that out.

Just sayin&#039;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your making assumptions Tom.<br />
Has any of these people endorsed NASA&#8217;s FY&#8217;11 budget since it&#8217;s been announced?<br />
Your confusing silence for support.<br />
I also agree with the part of supporting commercial cargo and crewed access to the ISS but I think his budget will make NASA just an R&amp;D agency and kill beyond LEO exploration for decades.<br />
I know what he said today but you have to remember he&#8217;s a politician and what they say and what they mean are usually two completely different things.  You should know that by now.</p>
<p>Lawdy&#8230;..  </p>
<p>I admit I didn&#8217;t know Ride endorsed Obama for prez.  Lately I&#8217;ve had my doubts on the impartiality of most of the members of that board and the conclusions they came up with.  It will be interesting to check that out.</p>
<p>Just sayin&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 20:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;That WSJ article is from Oct 2009, BEFORE the the FYâ€™10 budget was even released.&quot;

So?  Do you really think that 13 astronauts that wrote an op-ed supporting commercial crew would oppose a new NASA budget that has as its centerpiece commercial crew?  C&#039;mon, no one is that dense.

Think before you post.

&quot;Plus, its support of commercial HSF to LEO so NASA can concentrate on beyond LEO.&quot;

No duh.  As the President outlined earlier today, first exploration missions beyond Earth orbit by 2025, near-Earth asteroid missions early on, followed by Mars orbit and Mars landings in the 2030s.

Think before you post.

&quot;The BW article you refer to is also BEFORE the FYâ€™10 budget was released and quotes Ms Rideâ€™ initial reaction from some of the leaks that were making the rounds prior. Havenâ€™t heard much from her since. Donâ€™t confuse silence for acceptance.&quot;

Ride endorsed Obama when he was running for President.  She also served on the Augustine Committee, the report for which served as the template for NASA&#039;s FY 2011 budget proposal.  Do you really think Ride opposes a new NASA budget from a President she endorsed, that builds on a report that she helped write?  C&#039;mon, no one is that dense.

Think before you post.

Lawdy...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That WSJ article is from Oct 2009, BEFORE the the FYâ€™10 budget was even released.&#8221;</p>
<p>So?  Do you really think that 13 astronauts that wrote an op-ed supporting commercial crew would oppose a new NASA budget that has as its centerpiece commercial crew?  C&#8217;mon, no one is that dense.</p>
<p>Think before you post.</p>
<p>&#8220;Plus, its support of commercial HSF to LEO so NASA can concentrate on beyond LEO.&#8221;</p>
<p>No duh.  As the President outlined earlier today, first exploration missions beyond Earth orbit by 2025, near-Earth asteroid missions early on, followed by Mars orbit and Mars landings in the 2030s.</p>
<p>Think before you post.</p>
<p>&#8220;The BW article you refer to is also BEFORE the FYâ€™10 budget was released and quotes Ms Rideâ€™ initial reaction from some of the leaks that were making the rounds prior. Havenâ€™t heard much from her since. Donâ€™t confuse silence for acceptance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ride endorsed Obama when he was running for President.  She also served on the Augustine Committee, the report for which served as the template for NASA&#8217;s FY 2011 budget proposal.  Do you really think Ride opposes a new NASA budget from a President she endorsed, that builds on a report that she helped write?  C&#8217;mon, no one is that dense.</p>
<p>Think before you post.</p>
<p>Lawdy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEarl</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296069</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrEarl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:18:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296069</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M.D. 
I&#039;m not supporting financial mis-management and I would grudgingly support a cut to the NASA budget if it was in an effort to truly cut the deficit and balance the budget.  On the other hand, that in not the case here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M.D.<br />
I&#8217;m not supporting financial mis-management and I would grudgingly support a cut to the NASA budget if it was in an effort to truly cut the deficit and balance the budget.  On the other hand, that in not the case here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEarl</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrEarl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No one is making stuff up except you Tom.
That WSJ article is from Oct 2009, BEFORE the the FY&#039;10 budget was even released.
Now who&#039;s making stuff up?

Plus, its support of commercial HSF to LEO so NASA can concentrate on beyond LEO.  A promise to make a decision on HLV in 5years, extension of a space station in LEO and a few tech demonstrations is hardly a program for beyond LEO manned spacefligt.

The BW article you refer to is also BEFORE the FY&#039;10 budget was released and quotes Ms Ride&#039; initial reaction from some of the leaks that were making the rounds prior.  Haven&#039;t heard much from her since.  Don&#039;t confuse silence for acceptance. 

Get you facts straight before you post.
Geez.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No one is making stuff up except you Tom.<br />
That WSJ article is from Oct 2009, BEFORE the the FY&#8217;10 budget was even released.<br />
Now who&#8217;s making stuff up?</p>
<p>Plus, its support of commercial HSF to LEO so NASA can concentrate on beyond LEO.  A promise to make a decision on HLV in 5years, extension of a space station in LEO and a few tech demonstrations is hardly a program for beyond LEO manned spacefligt.</p>
<p>The BW article you refer to is also BEFORE the FY&#8217;10 budget was released and quotes Ms Ride&#8217; initial reaction from some of the leaks that were making the rounds prior.  Haven&#8217;t heard much from her since.  Don&#8217;t confuse silence for acceptance. </p>
<p>Get you facts straight before you post.<br />
Geez&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296064</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296064</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Mr.Earl,

OK. I&#039;ll accept your credentials at face value. I won&#039;t be drawn into &quot;naming three&quot; for legal reasons (although their associations are on public record) and it&#039;s a long drawn-out conversation.

I am aware of the &quot;half-a-penny&quot; argument and I&#039;m absolutely AMAZED at how many members of the general public (and some professionals!) foolishly use this argument to support financial mis-management.

Why would self-thinking (i.e. not simply led by others) people recommend a massive spending policy in the midst of a serious recession simply because other federal costs are currently running high?!

The country has lived on its credit card for so long, that if it wasn&#039;t for the petro-dollar...well I dread to think!

And to make matters worse, all this criticism in the face of a NASA budget increase?!

Everyday they sound like a group self-serving ingrats.

They&#039;re a disgrace.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mr.Earl,</p>
<p>OK. I&#8217;ll accept your credentials at face value. I won&#8217;t be drawn into &#8220;naming three&#8221; for legal reasons (although their associations are on public record) and it&#8217;s a long drawn-out conversation.</p>
<p>I am aware of the &#8220;half-a-penny&#8221; argument and I&#8217;m absolutely AMAZED at how many members of the general public (and some professionals!) foolishly use this argument to support financial mis-management.</p>
<p>Why would self-thinking (i.e. not simply led by others) people recommend a massive spending policy in the midst of a serious recession simply because other federal costs are currently running high?!</p>
<p>The country has lived on its credit card for so long, that if it wasn&#8217;t for the petro-dollar&#8230;well I dread to think!</p>
<p>And to make matters worse, all this criticism in the face of a NASA budget increase?!</p>
<p>Everyday they sound like a group self-serving ingrats.</p>
<p>They&#8217;re a disgrace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296056</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296056</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;there is almost universal condemnation for this â€œplanâ€ from anyone who has truly DONE anything in human space flight.&quot;

Simple not true.

13 former astronauts, including ones that can claim firsts like Norm Thagard, wrote this WSJ op-ed:

online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574475091646686368.html

Peter Diamandis, the guy who put together the X PRIZE, wrote this WSJ op-ed:

online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574475091646686368.html

Sally Ride, the first American woman in space, endorsed NASA&#039;s FY 2011 budget request:

businessweek.com/news/2010-01-28/nasa-to-get-6-billion-to-outsource-crew-ferry-official-says.html

Don&#039;t make stuff up...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;there is almost universal condemnation for this â€œplanâ€ from anyone who has truly DONE anything in human space flight.&#8221;</p>
<p>Simple not true.</p>
<p>13 former astronauts, including ones that can claim firsts like Norm Thagard, wrote this WSJ op-ed:</p>
<p>online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574475091646686368.html</p>
<p>Peter Diamandis, the guy who put together the X PRIZE, wrote this WSJ op-ed:</p>
<p>online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704107204574475091646686368.html</p>
<p>Sally Ride, the first American woman in space, endorsed NASA&#8217;s FY 2011 budget request:</p>
<p>businessweek.com/news/2010-01-28/nasa-to-get-6-billion-to-outsource-crew-ferry-official-says.html</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t make stuff up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEarl</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrEarl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:21:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M.D
You suspect wrong about me.  I&#039;m a Systems Engineer for a small private bank in Maryland.  As I told the Augustine Committee in June, I have no dog in this fight other than to see US human spaceflight advance safely and SOON.  I think this plan by the White House is just a way to kill NASA human spaceflight and set US human spaceflight back 50 years.
As for the others that I mention, name 3 that have a vested interest in seeing Constellation proceed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M.D<br />
You suspect wrong about me.  I&#8217;m a Systems Engineer for a small private bank in Maryland.  As I told the Augustine Committee in June, I have no dog in this fight other than to see US human spaceflight advance safely and SOON.  I think this plan by the White House is just a way to kill NASA human spaceflight and set US human spaceflight back 50 years.<br />
As for the others that I mention, name 3 that have a vested interest in seeing Constellation proceed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MrEarl</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296047</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrEarl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296047</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@M.D. 
&quot;Thank god (and Iâ€™m not religious) for common sense and a sensible eye on the purse!&quot;
Do you know what part of every dollar spent by the federal government is spent by NASA?  Half a penny!
The GM bailout could support the NASA budget for 3 years.  The AIG bailout could support NASA to 8 years.  
This year, FY&#039;10, just the budget deficit is 1.3 TRILLION bucks.  If you ELIMINATE Nasa that figure would still be 1.3 trillion!
There&#039;s enough blame to pass around to BOTH parties for getting us into this situation.  Skimping on funding NASA properly is half a penny wise and pound foolish.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@M.D.<br />
&#8220;Thank god (and Iâ€™m not religious) for common sense and a sensible eye on the purse!&#8221;<br />
Do you know what part of every dollar spent by the federal government is spent by NASA?  Half a penny!<br />
The GM bailout could support the NASA budget for 3 years.  The AIG bailout could support NASA to 8 years.<br />
This year, FY&#8217;10, just the budget deficit is 1.3 TRILLION bucks.  If you ELIMINATE Nasa that figure would still be 1.3 trillion!<br />
There&#8217;s enough blame to pass around to BOTH parties for getting us into this situation.  Skimping on funding NASA properly is half a penny wise and pound foolish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M.D.</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/15/white-house-responds-to-armstrong-criticism/#comment-296043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[M.D.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3357#comment-296043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nearly everyone you mention, with few exceptions and Angelia Peura have vested financial links with the companies that stand to mis-out financially from the closure of Constellation - as I suspect you do too.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nearly everyone you mention, with few exceptions and Angelia Peura have vested financial links with the companies that stand to mis-out financially from the closure of Constellation &#8211; as I suspect you do too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
