<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another step forward for export control reform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/21/another-step-forward-for-export-control-reform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/21/another-step-forward-for-export-control-reform/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=another-step-forward-for-export-control-reform</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; Briefly: optimism, pessimism, and export control</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/21/another-step-forward-for-export-control-reform/#comment-350156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; Briefly: optimism, pessimism, and export control]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 10:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3384#comment-350156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] be done through &#8220;executive authority&#8221;, The Hill reports. Last year the administration put forward a plan featuring what&#8217;s been dubbed the &#8220;four singles&#8221; that would create a single export control list with multiple tiers, a single licensing agency, a [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] be done through &#8220;executive authority&#8221;, The Hill reports. Last year the administration put forward a plan featuring what&#8217;s been dubbed the &#8220;four singles&#8221; that would create a single export control list with multiple tiers, a single licensing agency, a [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics &#187; More obstacles ahead for export control reform?</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/04/21/another-step-forward-for-export-control-reform/#comment-313956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics &#187; More obstacles ahead for export control reform?]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 10:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3384#comment-313956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] reason for the lack of details may be that the administration already laid out its plans for comprehensive export control reform, including an approach dubbed the &#8220;four singles&#8221; that would consolidate the existing, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] reason for the lack of details may be that the administration already laid out its plans for comprehensive export control reform, including an approach dubbed the &#8220;four singles&#8221; that would consolidate the existing, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
