<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hearing on Limits of Executive Power: Vincent Bugliosi &#124; legal-legal</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302870</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hearing on Limits of Executive Power: Vincent Bugliosi &#124; legal-legal]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 01:01:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Space Politics &#187; Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Space Politics &raquo; Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302507</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302507</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Youâ€™d think that all those Trekkies would actually want to see some of their big interstellar dreams become reality for once in their lives!&lt;/em&gt;

You&#039;d only think that if you were unfamiliar with them.  Most Trek people are uninterested in space.  They&#039;re more into fantasy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Youâ€™d think that all those Trekkies would actually want to see some of their big interstellar dreams become reality for once in their lives!</em></p>
<p>You&#8217;d only think that if you were unfamiliar with them.  Most Trek people are uninterested in space.  They&#8217;re more into fantasy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 07:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking of Captain Kirk, have you all noticed the total silence of the Sci-Fi community in all this save-or-kill-Constellation debate??  You&#039;d think that all those Trekkies would actually want to see some of their big interstellar dreams become reality for once in their lives!  You&#039;d think that they&#039;d be clamoring to rescue this deep space initiative, at those conventions that they always hold!  (Let&#039;s make Science Fiction real.....)  But no. Alas, all those Star Trek, Star Wars, &amp; Avatar fans are far too wrapped up in merely being entertained, than to actually care about REAL space exploration!  [Hey, Sci-Fi fans: NASA is NEVER going to discover a race of blue-skinned cat-people, as long as it stays trapped in LEO!]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking of Captain Kirk, have you all noticed the total silence of the Sci-Fi community in all this save-or-kill-Constellation debate??  You&#8217;d think that all those Trekkies would actually want to see some of their big interstellar dreams become reality for once in their lives!  You&#8217;d think that they&#8217;d be clamoring to rescue this deep space initiative, at those conventions that they always hold!  (Let&#8217;s make Science Fiction real&#8230;..)  But no. Alas, all those Star Trek, Star Wars, &amp; Avatar fans are far too wrapped up in merely being entertained, than to actually care about REAL space exploration!  [Hey, Sci-Fi fans: NASA is NEVER going to discover a race of blue-skinned cat-people, as long as it stays trapped in LEO!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 16:07:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand,

Maybe he is going for a Kirk/Shatner imperssonation

Because HE&#039;s goT To!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand,</p>
<p>Maybe he is going for a Kirk/Shatner imperssonation</p>
<p>Because HE&#8217;s goT To!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobof</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcel F. Williams wrote @ May 9th, 2010 at 9:44 pm 
brobof  wrote @ May 7th, 2010 at 8:17 pm refers. ON THIS THREAD
Short term memory loss or wilful ignorance. Either way Marcel: Doh!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcel F. Williams wrote @ May 9th, 2010 at 9:44 pm<br />
brobof  wrote @ May 7th, 2010 at 8:17 pm refers. ON THIS THREAD<br />
Short term memory loss or wilful ignorance. Either way Marcel: Doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302248</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 15:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302248</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know, Chris, nonsense doesn&#039;t become sensible by adding lots of capital letters and exclamation marks to it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, Chris, nonsense doesn&#8217;t become sensible by adding lots of capital letters and exclamation marks to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 07:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Rand Simberg.....Flexible Path is a big excuse for us to NOT do anything! To think small all over again, and to STAY stuck in LEO for another decade or two more!  Constellation is about getting us back to the frontier, for another round of daring exploration on another world. A call for us to expand the human presence there, and do much more than merely reach the place again. We&#039;re back to the Moon to stay, this time, because the Altair lander will be capable of emplacing hab modules there. Flexible Path throws our attention in way too many directions all at once, and will lead to dead-end, big-brag, &quot;Look, we got there first!&quot; jaunts to asteroids, where believe you me, NO bases will be built, and NO industrial infrastructure will emerge ever. Because now, according to Flexible Path: We can NEVER go back to where we&#039;ve been. Every destination now has to be 100% virgin territory, or we condemn it as passe &amp; not worth a second look. Flexible Path leads to nothing---but the euphoria about being the first to go anyplace!  A string of euphoric firsts will NOT lead to base emplacement NOR industrial development!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Rand Simberg&#8230;..Flexible Path is a big excuse for us to NOT do anything! To think small all over again, and to STAY stuck in LEO for another decade or two more!  Constellation is about getting us back to the frontier, for another round of daring exploration on another world. A call for us to expand the human presence there, and do much more than merely reach the place again. We&#8217;re back to the Moon to stay, this time, because the Altair lander will be capable of emplacing hab modules there. Flexible Path throws our attention in way too many directions all at once, and will lead to dead-end, big-brag, &#8220;Look, we got there first!&#8221; jaunts to asteroids, where believe you me, NO bases will be built, and NO industrial infrastructure will emerge ever. Because now, according to Flexible Path: We can NEVER go back to where we&#8217;ve been. Every destination now has to be 100% virgin territory, or we condemn it as passe &amp; not worth a second look. Flexible Path leads to nothing&#8212;but the euphoria about being the first to go anyplace!  A string of euphoric firsts will NOT lead to base emplacement NOR industrial development!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Space Politics Â» Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks &#124; Commercial Space Travel</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302111</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Space Politics Â» Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks &#124; Commercial Space Travel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 03:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] the original here: Space Politics Â» Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks   Share and [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] the original here: Space Politics Â» Briefly noted: committee hearing, Griffin talks   Share and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 01:11:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcel F. Williams wrote @ May 10th, 2010 at 6:45 pm

&lt;i&gt;

Please forgive me but how can anyone take you seriously when you think an amateur rocket company like Space X knows a lot more about space travel than NASA, Boeing, and Lockheed, and Energia. &lt;/i&gt;

how can anyone take you seriously when you call a company that has invested hundreds of millions in a potential product &quot;amateur rocket company&quot;.

sorry...you are just a step above a mightywind

sad

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marcel F. Williams wrote @ May 10th, 2010 at 6:45 pm</p>
<p><i></p>
<p>Please forgive me but how can anyone take you seriously when you think an amateur rocket company like Space X knows a lot more about space travel than NASA, Boeing, and Lockheed, and Energia. </i></p>
<p>how can anyone take you seriously when you call a company that has invested hundreds of millions in a potential product &#8220;amateur rocket company&#8221;.</p>
<p>sorry&#8230;you are just a step above a mightywind</p>
<p>sad</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Starjock</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/05/07/briefly-noted-committee-hearing-griffin-talks/#comment-302079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Starjock]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 00:39:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3455#comment-302079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Has a &quot;Witness List&quot; been posted yet for the Senate Hearings on Wednesday?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has a &#8220;Witness List&#8221; been posted yet for the Senate Hearings on Wednesday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
