<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grumbling about Bolden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=grumbling-about-bolden</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-317302</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Luke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jul 2010 18:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-317302</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I feel that the past 20 years or so have been wasted effort on the silly &quot;international&quot; space can.    It really has not resulted in anything of scientific or political recompense, short of a few thousand tons of space garbage.  We should have been developing a REAL moon base,  with an underground element.   By now , we would have established a far larger presence and knowledge base of the moon , and a launching point  for more than just another photo op.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel that the past 20 years or so have been wasted effort on the silly &#8220;international&#8221; space can.    It really has not resulted in anything of scientific or political recompense, short of a few thousand tons of space garbage.  We should have been developing a REAL moon base,  with an underground element.   By now , we would have established a far larger presence and knowledge base of the moon , and a launching point  for more than just another photo op.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobof</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-313018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 01:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-313018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA  wrote @ June 26th, 2010 at 4:05 pm 
I an unreliably informed that your ex VP can&#039;t get under the bridge something about running water. And hawthorn. And garlic.

Heck I would have endorsed a Moon landing in 2020! 
However for an extra $159 billion??? (6.2.4 Unconstrained Program of Record with the ISS Extension.) Ahh but you want to trash the ISS. So thats only $145 billion then. Trying to do that within the budget meant 2030&#039;s (If ever.)
Change? Too right he changed.
Try re-reading his speech again. Without the partisan blinkers.
When I let go of what I am,
I become what I might be.
Lao Tzu]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA  wrote @ June 26th, 2010 at 4:05 pm<br />
I an unreliably informed that your ex VP can&#8217;t get under the bridge something about running water. And hawthorn. And garlic.</p>
<p>Heck I would have endorsed a Moon landing in 2020!<br />
However for an extra $159 billion??? (6.2.4 Unconstrained Program of Record with the ISS Extension.) Ahh but you want to trash the ISS. So thats only $145 billion then. Trying to do that within the budget meant 2030&#8217;s (If ever.)<br />
Change? Too right he changed.<br />
Try re-reading his speech again. Without the partisan blinkers.<br />
When I let go of what I am,<br />
I become what I might be.<br />
Lao Tzu</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 20:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@brobof&lt;-- And while you&#039;re there, say &#039;hi&#039; to Cheney.

Per candidate Obamaâ€™s space policy paper of 2008, â€˜Candidate Obamaâ€™ has certainly embraced â€˜changeâ€™â€“ his own. 

&quot;Embracing Human Space Exploration:

Human spaceflight is important to Americaâ€™s political, economic, technological, and scientific leadership. Barack Obama will support renewed human exploration beyond low earth orbit.â€ 

â€œHe endorses the goal of sending human missions to the Moon by 2020, as a precursor in an orderly progression to missions to more
distant destinations, including Mars.â€ -source, 

http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/policy/Space_Fact_Sheet_FINAL.pdf

Oops! Change you can believe in... President Obama, not so much with respect to space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brobof&lt;&#8211; And while you&#039;re there, say &#039;hi&#039; to Cheney.</p>
<p>Per candidate Obamaâ€™s space policy paper of 2008, â€˜Candidate Obamaâ€™ has certainly embraced â€˜changeâ€™â€“ his own. </p>
<p>&quot;Embracing Human Space Exploration:</p>
<p>Human spaceflight is important to Americaâ€™s political, economic, technological, and scientific leadership. Barack Obama will support renewed human exploration beyond low earth orbit.â€ </p>
<p>â€œHe endorses the goal of sending human missions to the Moon by 2020, as a precursor in an orderly progression to missions to more<br />
distant destinations, including Mars.â€ -source, </p>
<p><a href="http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/policy/Space_Fact_Sheet_FINAL.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.barackobama.com/pdf/policy/Space_Fact_Sheet_FINAL.pdf</a></p>
<p>Oops! Change you can believe in&#8230; President Obama, not so much with respect to space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 19:59:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@brobof &quot;Be careful... It&#039;s dark and cold and wet under the bridge!&quot; This writer wouldn&#039;t know. You clearly do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@brobof &#8220;Be careful&#8230; It&#8217;s dark and cold and wet under the bridge!&#8221; This writer wouldn&#8217;t know. You clearly do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobof</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312913</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 13:14:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA  wrote @ June 25th, 2010 at 4:29 pm 

@brobof- â€œPrecisely hence:â€But I just have to say pretty bluntly here: Weâ€™ve been there before. Buzz has been there. â€ &lt;â€“ Inaccurate. This writers posting is verbatum from CNN video of 4/15/10. But you go on believing President Obama&#039;s plans for a space program will materialize in 2020, 2030 and beyond. He said he&#039;d close Gitmo, too.

I cut and pasted from the transcript: But if you want to make a point of style over substance...

writer&#039;s
verbatim &lt;- ROTFLMAO

http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html http://www.nasa.gov/about/obamaspeechfeature.html

Your partisan sniping adds little to this thread. However since you raise a straw Gitmo: Bush legacy. Republican intransigence. Congressional Failure. Starting to sound familiar?
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26gitmo.html
Be careful DCSCA. It&#039;s dark and cold and wet under the bridge!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA  wrote @ June 25th, 2010 at 4:29 pm </p>
<p>@brobof- â€œPrecisely hence:â€But I just have to say pretty bluntly here: Weâ€™ve been there before. Buzz has been there. â€ &lt;â€“ Inaccurate. This writers posting is verbatum from CNN video of 4/15/10. But you go on believing President Obama&#039;s plans for a space program will materialize in 2020, 2030 and beyond. He said he&#039;d close Gitmo, too.</p>
<p>I cut and pasted from the transcript: But if you want to make a point of style over substance&#8230;</p>
<p>writer&#039;s<br />
verbatim &lt;- ROTFLMAO</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/news/media/trans/obama_ksc_trans.html</a> <a href="http://www.nasa.gov/about/obamaspeechfeature.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nasa.gov/about/obamaspeechfeature.html</a></p>
<p>Your partisan sniping adds little to this thread. However since you raise a straw Gitmo: Bush legacy. Republican intransigence. Congressional Failure. Starting to sound familiar?<br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26gitmo.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/06/26/us/politics/26gitmo.html</a><br />
Be careful DCSCA. It&#039;s dark and cold and wet under the bridge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Simberg wrote @ June 26th, 2010 at 1:35 am 
The price for Elon is a ticket to Mars.  Idiot. &lt;- Speak for yourself.  You&#039;ll learn soon enough.  &quot;The price&quot; of a ticket for &#039;Elon&#039; from LA, CA to Mars, PA is less than $200.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Simberg wrote @ June 26th, 2010 at 1:35 am<br />
The price for Elon is a ticket to Mars.  Idiot. &lt;- Speak for yourself.  You&#039;ll learn soon enough.  &quot;The price&quot; of a ticket for &#039;Elon&#039; from LA, CA to Mars, PA is less than $200.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The price for Elon is a ticket to Mars.

Idiot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The price for Elon is a ticket to Mars.</p>
<p>Idiot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312860</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Simberg wrote @ June 26th, 2010 at 1:16 am 
OK, in other words, you persist in your ignorance of both history and Elon Musk.  &lt;--- We&#039;ve already ascertained &#039;history&#039; is not your strong point, Rand. Suggest you brush up on how capitalists operate as well. Musk is no von Braun. He&#039;ll sell when the price is right-- and rightly so. It&#039;s the right thing to do for his investors and himself. But you&#039;ll learn that soon enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Simberg wrote @ June 26th, 2010 at 1:16 am<br />
OK, in other words, you persist in your ignorance of both history and Elon Musk.  &lt;&#8212; We&#039;ve already ascertained &#039;history&#039; is not your strong point, Rand. Suggest you brush up on how capitalists operate as well. Musk is no von Braun. He&#039;ll sell when the price is right&#8211; and rightly so. It&#039;s the right thing to do for his investors and himself. But you&#039;ll learn that soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312853</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 05:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, in other words, you persist in your ignorance of both history and Elon Musk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, in other words, you persist in your ignorance of both history and Elon Musk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/06/24/grumbling-about-bolden/#comment-312840</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jun 2010 04:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3654#comment-312840</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Simberg wrote @ June 25th, 2010 at 9:36 pm 
OK. We get it. 

We?? Idiot?? Please, speak for yourself.  Let&#039;s review your lessons for today- Nixon killed Apollo, not LBJ; Musk is a capitalist who is in business to turn a profit for himself and his investors- he is not Wernher von Braun. He has sold his interests in other projects he has started and he will sell his stake in SpaceX for the right price, as a good CEO capitalist should, for himself and his invetors; Musk and a trailer full of his space hardware  is more likely to visit Mars, Pennsylvania before any of it ever gets close to the planet Mars. And finally, 1+1=2, not 11.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Simberg wrote @ June 25th, 2010 at 9:36 pm<br />
OK. We get it. </p>
<p>We?? Idiot?? Please, speak for yourself.  Let&#8217;s review your lessons for today- Nixon killed Apollo, not LBJ; Musk is a capitalist who is in business to turn a profit for himself and his investors- he is not Wernher von Braun. He has sold his interests in other projects he has started and he will sell his stake in SpaceX for the right price, as a good CEO capitalist should, for himself and his invetors; Musk and a trailer full of his space hardware  is more likely to visit Mars, Pennsylvania before any of it ever gets close to the planet Mars. And finally, 1+1=2, not 11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
