<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some more commentary on the national space policy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Democracy for Mars</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-316364</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Democracy for Mars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 15:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-316364</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you all want to stop dictatorship on Mars Planet check out this site www.democracyformars.com for a real free planet. 
We can star there a discussion over all this topics
see you there]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you all want to stop dictatorship on Mars Planet check out this site <a href="http://www.democracyformars.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.democracyformars.com</a> for a real free planet.<br />
We can star there a discussion over all this topics<br />
see you there</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Low Earth Orbit: Haven&#039;t we been there already?!  Why doesn&#039;t Buzz Aldrin gnaw on THAT bone for a little while?? (He was on the Lunar surface for a mere 21 hours, tops; both the single EVA plus the time spent in the landed LM.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Low Earth Orbit: Haven&#8217;t we been there already?!  Why doesn&#8217;t Buzz Aldrin gnaw on THAT bone for a little while?? (He was on the Lunar surface for a mere 21 hours, tops; both the single EVA plus the time spent in the landed LM.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315391</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[^^ Apologies- posted on wrong thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^^ Apologies- posted on wrong thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 20:33:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent post, Jeff Foust. 

This writer has worked within the realm where the &#039;monster media&#039; roams for nearly three decades. It likes shiny objects that easily bait and distract. That 24-hour news cycle is a hungry animal, that demands feeding around the clock-- and it&#039;s diapers changed regularly.  For the primary objective is to draw a crowd and sell things -- not enlighten and inform. It is quite obvious what happened with Bolden. It could happen to anyone targeting a message to favor a specific audience. He knew who his audience was in this instance and earnestly emphasized NASA&#039;s &#039;out-reach&#039; to that audience, but mangled the message. The Rabid Right, particularly knee-jerk blogs and just jerk-talk radio, not the target audience for Bolden&#039;s comments and ever hungry for tidbits to feed the &#039;animal,&#039; pounced, chewed it up into yet another scrap and tossed into their daily anti-Obama spin cycle for down market and to the Right listeners and readers to consume. Today it will be something else. 

It&#039;s clear Bolden is not smooth or comfortable at public affairs. Few come naturally to it and most need schooled in the basics. At times, NASA has been blessed with some good ones. You know who they are. The administratorâ€™s comments, for better or worse, essentially follow the trajectory of â€˜inclusionâ€™ as spelled out by the WH and articulated by the president at KSC on 4/15. It is what it is.
 
The issue isnâ€™t Bolden, but whether American space efforts will continue to be bold. 

This WH has played their space cards and moved on. Itâ€™s up to Congress now. Change is in the air. The question for our time is if it truly is change you can believe in.

But the private enterprise-laced &#039;Obamaspace&#039; plan, as proposed by this administration, should be an &#039;easy sell&#039;  to the out of power, no regulation, pro-business minority party, with a laisse-faire minority subset that has historically not supported the government funded, civilian space agency. Instead, they snacked on the administrator because it takes another bite out of an administration they abhor. The future of our space program has little to do with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent post, Jeff Foust. </p>
<p>This writer has worked within the realm where the &#8216;monster media&#8217; roams for nearly three decades. It likes shiny objects that easily bait and distract. That 24-hour news cycle is a hungry animal, that demands feeding around the clock&#8211; and it&#8217;s diapers changed regularly.  For the primary objective is to draw a crowd and sell things &#8212; not enlighten and inform. It is quite obvious what happened with Bolden. It could happen to anyone targeting a message to favor a specific audience. He knew who his audience was in this instance and earnestly emphasized NASA&#8217;s &#8216;out-reach&#8217; to that audience, but mangled the message. The Rabid Right, particularly knee-jerk blogs and just jerk-talk radio, not the target audience for Bolden&#8217;s comments and ever hungry for tidbits to feed the &#8216;animal,&#8217; pounced, chewed it up into yet another scrap and tossed into their daily anti-Obama spin cycle for down market and to the Right listeners and readers to consume. Today it will be something else. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s clear Bolden is not smooth or comfortable at public affairs. Few come naturally to it and most need schooled in the basics. At times, NASA has been blessed with some good ones. You know who they are. The administratorâ€™s comments, for better or worse, essentially follow the trajectory of â€˜inclusionâ€™ as spelled out by the WH and articulated by the president at KSC on 4/15. It is what it is.</p>
<p>The issue isnâ€™t Bolden, but whether American space efforts will continue to be bold. </p>
<p>This WH has played their space cards and moved on. Itâ€™s up to Congress now. Change is in the air. The question for our time is if it truly is change you can believe in.</p>
<p>But the private enterprise-laced &#8216;Obamaspace&#8217; plan, as proposed by this administration, should be an &#8216;easy sell&#8217;  to the out of power, no regulation, pro-business minority party, with a laisse-faire minority subset that has historically not supported the government funded, civilian space agency. Instead, they snacked on the administrator because it takes another bite out of an administration they abhor. The future of our space program has little to do with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 19:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think that sums it all. What is it that a comedian gets that a lot of people here cannot? Neurosurgery any one?

http://nasawatch.com/archives/2010/07/video-nasa-bold.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that sums it all. What is it that a comedian gets that a lot of people here cannot? Neurosurgery any one?</p>
<p><a href="http://nasawatch.com/archives/2010/07/video-nasa-bold.html" rel="nofollow">http://nasawatch.com/archives/2010/07/video-nasa-bold.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:30:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@  Fred Cink wrote @ July 8th, 2010 at 1:59 pm

Wow very constructive. I was wondering why Constellation was adrift...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@  Fred Cink wrote @ July 8th, 2010 at 1:59 pm</p>
<p>Wow very constructive. I was wondering why Constellation was adrift&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Cink</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315338</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Cink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For common sense on your reply to juggler...&quot;The (your?) interpretation is frivolous and free. It is a large stretch. You (seem to) hear what you want to hear not what he said. An unfortunate common trait of people...&quot; trying to keep from spilling kool aid on their cheerleading sweaters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For common sense on your reply to juggler&#8230;&#8221;The (your?) interpretation is frivolous and free. It is a large stretch. You (seem to) hear what you want to hear not what he said. An unfortunate common trait of people&#8230;&#8221; trying to keep from spilling kool aid on their cheerleading sweaters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315297</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Stephen.  Sometimes I get lucky.  :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Stephen.  Sometimes I get lucky.  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bennett wrote:

&lt;i&gt;See you, and raise you one dollar&lt;/i&gt;

Bennett, that was AWESOME.  And on topic, since it featured a rocket launch. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bennett wrote:</p>
<p><i>See you, and raise you one dollar</i></p>
<p>Bennett, that was AWESOME.  And on topic, since it featured a rocket launch. <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trent Waddington</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/07/some-more-commentary-on-the-national-space-policy/#comment-315250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Trent Waddington]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 09:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3693#comment-315250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seeing as no-one is interested in the actual topic: http://quantumg.blogspot.com/2010/07/dr-paul-spudis-continues-to-baffle-me.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seeing as no-one is interested in the actual topic: <a href="http://quantumg.blogspot.com/2010/07/dr-paul-spudis-continues-to-baffle-me.html" rel="nofollow">http://quantumg.blogspot.com/2010/07/dr-paul-spudis-continues-to-baffle-me.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
