<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Bolden&#8217;s words say about NASA and the media</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-316046</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-316046</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Seems to me that world peace and defusing the tensions between the U.S. and the Muslim world should be a very high priority.&lt;/em&gt;

It should be a very high priority for the State Department.  NASA should have higher priorities.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Seems to me that world peace and defusing the tensions between the U.S. and the Muslim world should be a very high priority.</em></p>
<p>It should be a very high priority for the State Department.  NASA should have higher priorities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelly Starks</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-316043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kelly Starks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 14:15:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-316043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt; Stephen C. Smith wrote @ July 11th, 2010 at 7:59 pm 
&gt; Seems to me that world peace and defusing the tensions between
&gt;  the U.S. and the Muslim world should be a very high priority.
&gt;==
&gt; Weâ€™ve flown a Saudi in space, and weâ€™ve flown an Israeli
&gt;  in space. If we could get both an Arab and an Israeli on
&gt;  the ISS at the same time, it would be a major symbolic step
&gt;  forward in world peace. ==

If you want symbolism, buy a painting.  You want world peace, you either need to find common ground (infeasable in this case) or make war unacceptably expensive.  Symbolism never stopped a war.  It just distracts folks while real actions are happening somewhere else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; Stephen C. Smith wrote @ July 11th, 2010 at 7:59 pm<br />
&gt; Seems to me that world peace and defusing the tensions between<br />
&gt;  the U.S. and the Muslim world should be a very high priority.<br />
&gt;==<br />
&gt; Weâ€™ve flown a Saudi in space, and weâ€™ve flown an Israeli<br />
&gt;  in space. If we could get both an Arab and an Israeli on<br />
&gt;  the ISS at the same time, it would be a major symbolic step<br />
&gt;  forward in world peace. ==</p>
<p>If you want symbolism, buy a painting.  You want world peace, you either need to find common ground (infeasable in this case) or make war unacceptably expensive.  Symbolism never stopped a war.  It just distracts folks while real actions are happening somewhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315983</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 03:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315983</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Funny how when the Reagan administration wanted to commercialize space access... &quot; Point is, for that era it was a disasterous idea, both figuratively and literally.  Today, at the cost of essentially losing the government funded and managed manned space program, it still is.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Funny how when the Reagan administration wanted to commercialize space access&#8230; &#8221; Point is, for that era it was a disasterous idea, both figuratively and literally.  Today, at the cost of essentially losing the government funded and managed manned space program, it still is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:59:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Simberg wrote:

&lt;i&gt;The issue with the Muslim outreach isnâ€™t that per se, but rather the incongruously high priority that it seems to have been given over actual accomplishments in space.&lt;/i&gt;

Seems to me that world peace and defusing the tensions between the U.S. and the Muslim world should be a very high priority.

&quot;Actual accomplishments in space&quot; will happen regardless, sooner or later.  If we have to keep spending hundreds of billions of dollars on problems in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention the ongoing Israel saga, that&#039;s money siphoned away from other projects including NASA.

We&#039;ve flown a Saudi in space, and we&#039;ve flown an Israeli in space.  If we could get both an Arab and an Israeli on the ISS at the same time, it would be a major symbolic step forward in world peace.  Nixon agreed to Apollo-Soyuz as a symbol of detente.  It might not have been much science but it sure told the world we intended to put the Cold War behind us.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Simberg wrote:</p>
<p><i>The issue with the Muslim outreach isnâ€™t that per se, but rather the incongruously high priority that it seems to have been given over actual accomplishments in space.</i></p>
<p>Seems to me that world peace and defusing the tensions between the U.S. and the Muslim world should be a very high priority.</p>
<p>&#8220;Actual accomplishments in space&#8221; will happen regardless, sooner or later.  If we have to keep spending hundreds of billions of dollars on problems in Iraq and Afghanistan, not to mention the ongoing Israel saga, that&#8217;s money siphoned away from other projects including NASA.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve flown a Saudi in space, and we&#8217;ve flown an Israeli in space.  If we could get both an Arab and an Israeli on the ISS at the same time, it would be a major symbolic step forward in world peace.  Nixon agreed to Apollo-Soyuz as a symbol of detente.  It might not have been much science but it sure told the world we intended to put the Cold War behind us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Simberg &quot;The issue with the Muslim outreach isnâ€™t that per se, but rather the incongruously high priority that it seems to have been given over actual accomplishments in space.&quot;
 
It only sounds &#039;incongruous&#039; to those listening through a filter designed with a biased agenda opposed to the Obama administration in general (which you have already indicated.) It&#039;s no more of a &#039;high priority&#039; than it would be if Bolden had been speaking to a group of Eagle Scouts and favored his comments for that audience as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Simberg &#8220;The issue with the Muslim outreach isnâ€™t that per se, but rather the incongruously high priority that it seems to have been given over actual accomplishments in space.&#8221;</p>
<p>It only sounds &#8216;incongruous&#8217; to those listening through a filter designed with a biased agenda opposed to the Obama administration in general (which you have already indicated.) It&#8217;s no more of a &#8216;high priority&#8217; than it would be if Bolden had been speaking to a group of Eagle Scouts and favored his comments for that audience as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315951</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315951</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Stephen C. Smith. &quot; paid a few dollars to go through newspaper archives from the period now online. It seems that the U.S. got quite a bit of positive publicity in the Arab world from flying the Saudi prince on Discovery in 1985.&quot; This writer told you this for free on an earlier thread.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stephen C. Smith. &#8221; paid a few dollars to go through newspaper archives from the period now online. It seems that the U.S. got quite a bit of positive publicity in the Arab world from flying the Saudi prince on Discovery in 1985.&#8221; This writer told you this for free on an earlier thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 23:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Funny how when the Reagan administration wanted to commercialize space access and fly Muslims, it was okay, but now that Obama is in office itâ€™s not.&lt;/em&gt;

The issue with the Muslim outreach isn&#039;t that per se, but rather the incongruously high priority that it seems to have been given over actual accomplishments in space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Funny how when the Reagan administration wanted to commercialize space access and fly Muslims, it was okay, but now that Obama is in office itâ€™s not.</em></p>
<p>The issue with the Muslim outreach isn&#8217;t that per se, but rather the incongruously high priority that it seems to have been given over actual accomplishments in space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 12:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Swerving hard to port and back on topic, I&#039;ve posted this blog over on SpaceKSC.com:

http://spaceksc.blogspot.com/2010/07/much-ado-about-nothing.html

I paid a few dollars to go through newspaper archives from the period now online.  It seems that the U.S. got quite a bit of positive publicity in the Arab world from flying the Saudi prince on &lt;i&gt;Discovery&lt;/i&gt; in 1985.

Too bad nobody followed up on it until now.

Funny how when the Reagan administration wanted to commercialize space access and fly Muslims, it was okay, but now that Obama is in office it&#039;s not.  Hypocrisy, as usual, reigns supreme in certain quarters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Swerving hard to port and back on topic, I&#8217;ve posted this blog over on SpaceKSC.com:</p>
<p><a href="http://spaceksc.blogspot.com/2010/07/much-ado-about-nothing.html" rel="nofollow">http://spaceksc.blogspot.com/2010/07/much-ado-about-nothing.html</a></p>
<p>I paid a few dollars to go through newspaper archives from the period now online.  It seems that the U.S. got quite a bit of positive publicity in the Arab world from flying the Saudi prince on <i>Discovery</i> in 1985.</p>
<p>Too bad nobody followed up on it until now.</p>
<p>Funny how when the Reagan administration wanted to commercialize space access and fly Muslims, it was okay, but now that Obama is in office it&#8217;s not.  Hypocrisy, as usual, reigns supreme in certain quarters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315868</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[rich kolker wrote @ July 9th, 2010 at 9:39 am &lt;- Although &#039;Trek&#039; may be a particular-- and popular- subset, the general reference was to space related storycraft over a century or so in various mediums-- books, comics, radio, TV, film, etc., from the likes Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers to Luke Skywalker  (yes, Kirk &amp; Spock) and the imaginative works of Verne, Wells, Clarke, Asimov, Heinlein, Burroughs, Herbert, Bradbury, von Braun etc., in conjunction with other film/television projects. This writer left &#039;Trek&#039; behind in &#039;69 when NBC cancelled it. But the interest in space based stories is real. If there wasn&#039;t interest and a lucrative market which has clearly delivered a profit (no doubt more than actual private enterprised space ventures have for investors) it would not be produced.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rich kolker wrote @ July 9th, 2010 at 9:39 am &lt;- Although &#039;Trek&#039; may be a particular&#8211; and popular- subset, the general reference was to space related storycraft over a century or so in various mediums&#8211; books, comics, radio, TV, film, etc., from the likes Flash Gordon, Buck Rogers to Luke Skywalker  (yes, Kirk &amp; Spock) and the imaginative works of Verne, Wells, Clarke, Asimov, Heinlein, Burroughs, Herbert, Bradbury, von Braun etc., in conjunction with other film/television projects. This writer left &#039;Trek&#039; behind in &#039;69 when NBC cancelled it. But the interest in space based stories is real. If there wasn&#039;t interest and a lucrative market which has clearly delivered a profit (no doubt more than actual private enterprised space ventures have for investors) it would not be produced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/08/what-boldens-words-say-about-nasa-and-the-media/#comment-315867</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3697#comment-315867</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rand Simberg wrote @ July 9th, 2010 at 9:32 am &lt;- No, &#039;in other words&#039; you were inaccurate-- again.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rand Simberg wrote @ July 9th, 2010 at 9:32 am &lt;- No, &#039;in other words&#039; you were inaccurate&#8211; again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
