<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SpaceX, suborbital advocates fight NASA authorization bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Meijering</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-320043</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martijn Meijering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 21:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-320043</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Where do people come up with this lunacy, anyway?&lt;/i&gt;

Nature provides an infinite supply of idiocy to those with ulterior motives.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Where do people come up with this lunacy, anyway?</i></p>
<p>Nature provides an infinite supply of idiocy to those with ulterior motives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-320008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 17:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-320008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;1. It is not the main selling feature
2. It is not branded as an RLV&lt;/em&gt;

Where do people come up with this lunacy, anyway?  They seem to live in an alternate reality.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>1. It is not the main selling feature<br />
2. It is not branded as an RLV</em></p>
<p>Where do people come up with this lunacy, anyway?  They seem to live in an alternate reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byeman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 14:39:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Tell Musk &amp; SpaceX not to sell a lift system branded RLV if you canâ€™t demo the main selling feature to customers&quot;

1.  It is not the main selling feature
2.  It is not branded as an RLV
3.  NASA has them on contract as an ELV  (not COTS or CRS but as a launch service provider)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tell Musk &amp; SpaceX not to sell a lift system branded RLV if you canâ€™t demo the main selling feature to customers&#8221;</p>
<p>1.  It is not the main selling feature<br />
2.  It is not branded as an RLV<br />
3.  NASA has them on contract as an ELV  (not COTS or CRS but as a launch service provider)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Meijering</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martijn Meijering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 01:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;@Byeman, Dude. &lt;b&gt;Your&lt;/b&gt; SpaceX Merlin&lt;/i&gt; (emphasis added)

Heh.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>@Byeman, Dude. <b>Your</b> SpaceX Merlin</i> (emphasis added)</p>
<p>Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319880</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 23:32:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319880</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Tell Musk &amp; SpaceX not to sell a lift system branded RLV if you canâ€™t demo the main selling feature to customers.&lt;/em&gt;

It&#039;s not being sold as an RLV.  SpaceX&#039;s prices assume that they expend it each time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Tell Musk &amp; SpaceX not to sell a lift system branded RLV if you canâ€™t demo the main selling feature to customers.</em></p>
<p>It&#8217;s not being sold as an RLV.  SpaceX&#8217;s prices assume that they expend it each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Behrhorst</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bruce Behrhorst]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 22:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Byeman, Dude. Your SpaceX Merlin engine launcher as sold as a 100% 9 engine module recoverable system-Didn&#039;t happen.

This is where the rubber meets the road. Tell Musk &amp; SpaceX not to sell a lift system branded RLV if you can&#039;t demo the main selling feature to customers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Byeman, Dude. Your SpaceX Merlin engine launcher as sold as a 100% 9 engine module recoverable system-Didn&#8217;t happen.</p>
<p>This is where the rubber meets the road. Tell Musk &amp; SpaceX not to sell a lift system branded RLV if you can&#8217;t demo the main selling feature to customers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@  DCSCA wrote @ July 30th, 2010 at 4:24 pm 

You may want to learn something about musketeers. For one they worked for the government...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musketeer]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@  DCSCA wrote @ July 30th, 2010 at 4:24 pm </p>
<p>You may want to learn something about musketeers. For one they worked for the government&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musketeer" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musketeer</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byeman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Better to be a &#039;musketeer&quot; than a Shaft lover.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better to be a &#8216;musketeer&#8221; than a Shaft lover.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319697</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:32:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319697</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ DCSCA wrote @ July 30th, 2010 at 4:25 pm 

&quot;@byeman, And for the record, to date Elon Musk has flown absolutely nobody in space.&quot;

Neither has ATK nor LMT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ DCSCA wrote @ July 30th, 2010 at 4:25 pm </p>
<p>&#8220;@byeman, And for the record, to date Elon Musk has flown absolutely nobody in space.&#8221;</p>
<p>Neither has ATK nor LMT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/07/29/spacex-suborbital-advocates-fight-nasa-authorization-bill/#comment-319694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 20:25:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=3779#comment-319694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@byeman, And for the record, to date Elon Musk has flown absolutely nobody in space.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@byeman, And for the record, to date Elon Musk has flown absolutely nobody in space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
