<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hutchison praises NASA bill; Wolf worries about China</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330768</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330768</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Castro wrote @ October 14th, 2010 at 12:13 am

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Under Obamaâ€™s leadership, and with commercial space companies exclusively running the show, this is ALL that the U.S. of A. will be doing for the next 20 years!&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I hate to break it to you, but the President proposes, and Congress disposes.  In other words, Congress creates the laws and appropriations, and the President approves or rejects them.  So you see, the plans we have today may be influenced by the President, but Congress created them, and overwhelmingly approves of them.  How&#039;s that for democracy!

As far as &quot;commercial space companies exclusively running the show&quot;, you seem to wallow in your ignorance, so I guess I won&#039;t try and change that.

TTFN]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Castro wrote @ October 14th, 2010 at 12:13 am</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Under Obamaâ€™s leadership, and with commercial space companies exclusively running the show, this is ALL that the U.S. of A. will be doing for the next 20 years!</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I hate to break it to you, but the President proposes, and Congress disposes.  In other words, Congress creates the laws and appropriations, and the President approves or rejects them.  So you see, the plans we have today may be influenced by the President, but Congress created them, and overwhelmingly approves of them.  How&#8217;s that for democracy!</p>
<p>As far as &#8220;commercial space companies exclusively running the show&#8221;, you seem to wallow in your ignorance, so I guess I won&#8217;t try and change that.</p>
<p>TTFN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330692</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 04:13:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Coastal Ron, the standards HAVE been lowered...TO A MERE 200 or 300 miles up!!! Under Obama&#039;s leadership, and with commercial space companies exclusively running the show, this is ALL that the U.S. of A. will be doing for the next 20 years!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Coastal Ron, the standards HAVE been lowered&#8230;TO A MERE 200 or 300 miles up!!! Under Obama&#8217;s leadership, and with commercial space companies exclusively running the show, this is ALL that the U.S. of A. will be doing for the next 20 years!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Castro wrote @ October 13th, 2010 at 2:00 am

&quot;&lt;i&gt;if China so much as flies an Apollo 8-type of mission, and gets clear out of LEO, they will completely leave us in the dust at the starting gate, and WILL BE A SPACE SUPERPOWER!&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Oh, is that the definition of a space superpower?  To fly an Apollo 8-type mission around the Moon?  Wow, the standards have really been lowered.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Cislunar space will belong to them; period.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Yes, and I&#039;m sure they will have such a large spacecraft, that we won&#039;t be able to get by it without paying a toll.  Maybe they&#039;ll have a duty free shop?  ;-)

How did such a young guy like you become so obsessed with cold war paradigms?  I&#039;m a Gen-X&#039;er, and actually lived with the real fears of communism and nuclear war, and all I can say is that the big countries are much less confrontational now than 30 years ago.  If anything, China is exporting capitalism, not communism.

And as far as the Moon goes, no one is rushing to get there.  Let&#039;s talk again when the Chinese get their Long March 5 rocket operational (their Delta IV Heavy competitor), which is supposed to be around 2014.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Castro wrote @ October 13th, 2010 at 2:00 am</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>if China so much as flies an Apollo 8-type of mission, and gets clear out of LEO, they will completely leave us in the dust at the starting gate, and WILL BE A SPACE SUPERPOWER!</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Oh, is that the definition of a space superpower?  To fly an Apollo 8-type mission around the Moon?  Wow, the standards have really been lowered.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Cislunar space will belong to them; period.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, and I&#8217;m sure they will have such a large spacecraft, that we won&#8217;t be able to get by it without paying a toll.  Maybe they&#8217;ll have a duty free shop?  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
<p>How did such a young guy like you become so obsessed with cold war paradigms?  I&#8217;m a Gen-X&#8217;er, and actually lived with the real fears of communism and nuclear war, and all I can say is that the big countries are much less confrontational now than 30 years ago.  If anything, China is exporting capitalism, not communism.</p>
<p>And as far as the Moon goes, no one is rushing to get there.  Let&#8217;s talk again when the Chinese get their Long March 5 rocket operational (their Delta IV Heavy competitor), which is supposed to be around 2014.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 06:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Frank Glover.... Look dude, if China so much as flies an Apollo 8-type of mission, and gets clear out of LEO, they will completely leave us in the dust at the starting gate, and WILL BE A SPACE SUPERPOWER!! Cislunar space will belong to them; period. We haven&#039;t done jack in deep space since December of 1972!  I wasn&#039;t even alive then!  You know what?---I freaking pray that China gets on with it!! Godspeed to the Chinese, if they can finally stir up a new space race with the U.S.!  I hope this bland &amp; boring LEO station interlude is as short as possible, and that they get started on some tangible Lunar initiative; by say, 2020. The Chinese flag planted on Luna firma, with the promise of more extended operations than the last Apollo mission---some 50 years ago in time, by then---will be dynamically exciting to see. Maybe then, America will finally do something, other than endlessly low orbiting the Earth!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Frank Glover&#8230;. Look dude, if China so much as flies an Apollo 8-type of mission, and gets clear out of LEO, they will completely leave us in the dust at the starting gate, and WILL BE A SPACE SUPERPOWER!! Cislunar space will belong to them; period. We haven&#8217;t done jack in deep space since December of 1972!  I wasn&#8217;t even alive then!  You know what?&#8212;I freaking pray that China gets on with it!! Godspeed to the Chinese, if they can finally stir up a new space race with the U.S.!  I hope this bland &amp; boring LEO station interlude is as short as possible, and that they get started on some tangible Lunar initiative; by say, 2020. The Chinese flag planted on Luna firma, with the promise of more extended operations than the last Apollo mission&#8212;some 50 years ago in time, by then&#8212;will be dynamically exciting to see. Maybe then, America will finally do something, other than endlessly low orbiting the Earth!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Glover</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330549</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Glover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330549</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Does China even *want* &#039;cooperation with he US?&#039; (or any other Western nation?) That assumption seems to be a given in almost every message here. Bolden&#039;s going there does not, in and of itself, prove that. His reception may end up boiling down to; &quot;Thank you for your interest, Administrator Bolden. When we&#039;re also interested, we&#039;ll be sure to let you know.&quot;

Until and unless they do, this is much ado about nothing.


&quot;REMEMBER, THEYâ€™RE STILL COMMIES:&quot;

Correct. And we should be cautious, for reasons  Ferris Valyn has already pointed out.

Still, the more capable Soviet-Commies (and as of this writing, the still-more-capable-than-China Russians) never made it to the Moon, either...

And if they try to do it in an unsustainable Apollo/Constellation-esq, way, I still won&#039;t worry. That&#039;s hardly dominating cisclunar space

They *have* said they want a space station (their own, now mind you...any visits to ISS there might be [and know they don&#039;t currently use international docking mechanisms], would only be for the appearance of parity). See if they start there and do some serious orbital infrastructure building, of the sort we should&#039;ve been doing long ago (but...but...that means going &#039;round and round in LEO!&#039;) and may finally be about to, and maybe *then* you should worry...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does China even *want* &#8216;cooperation with he US?&#8217; (or any other Western nation?) That assumption seems to be a given in almost every message here. Bolden&#8217;s going there does not, in and of itself, prove that. His reception may end up boiling down to; &#8220;Thank you for your interest, Administrator Bolden. When we&#8217;re also interested, we&#8217;ll be sure to let you know.&#8221;</p>
<p>Until and unless they do, this is much ado about nothing.</p>
<p>&#8220;REMEMBER, THEYâ€™RE STILL COMMIES:&#8221;</p>
<p>Correct. And we should be cautious, for reasons  Ferris Valyn has already pointed out.</p>
<p>Still, the more capable Soviet-Commies (and as of this writing, the still-more-capable-than-China Russians) never made it to the Moon, either&#8230;</p>
<p>And if they try to do it in an unsustainable Apollo/Constellation-esq, way, I still won&#8217;t worry. That&#8217;s hardly dominating cisclunar space</p>
<p>They *have* said they want a space station (their own, now mind you&#8230;any visits to ISS there might be [and know they don&#8217;t currently use international docking mechanisms], would only be for the appearance of parity). See if they start there and do some serious orbital infrastructure building, of the sort we should&#8217;ve been doing long ago (but&#8230;but&#8230;that means going &#8217;round and round in LEO!&#8217;) and may finally be about to, and maybe *then* you should worry&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobof</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 20:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nailed it!
Letter From NASA Administrator Bolden to Rep. Wolf Regarding China http://srs.gs/14cc (SpaceRef)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nailed it!<br />
Letter From NASA Administrator Bolden to Rep. Wolf Regarding China <a href="http://srs.gs/14cc" rel="nofollow">http://srs.gs/14cc</a> (SpaceRef)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Spudis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330524</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Spudis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330524</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[brobof wrote @ October 11th, 2010 at 5:05 pm 

Well, with luck, we&#039;ll be around to learn,  &quot;the rest of the story.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>brobof wrote @ October 11th, 2010 at 5:05 pm </p>
<p>Well, with luck, we&#8217;ll be around to learn,  &#8220;the rest of the story.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330481</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:46:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;The title of the interview with Yu is:

â€œChinese scientists dream of man on the moonâ€
http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2010-10/580517.html&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I dream about making out with a supermodel.  Doesn&#039;t mean I have lingerie already picked out for her.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>The title of the interview with Yu is:</p>
<p>â€œChinese scientists dream of man on the moonâ€<br />
<a href="http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2010-10/580517.html" rel="nofollow">http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2010-10/580517.html</a></p></blockquote>
<p>I dream about making out with a supermodel.  Doesn&#8217;t mean I have lingerie already picked out for her.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brobof</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330477</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brobof]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330477</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anne Spudis wrote @ October 11th, 2010 at 9:05 am 
It&#039;s not research. It was, as I said, a simple calculation. But don&#039;t take my word for it! I invite you to calculate, given the well publicised figure by you know who, just how many cubic km of water there is. 
Then find a reservoir with that capacity. 
That is a simple measure of the supported population. Like the reservoir I cite: Windermere, I reserve a deal of the water for recreational use!

Alas the paper you cite does not appear to give any estimate as to the quantity of water on the Moon and is therefore irrelevant to the discussion. I would add that the cited data MAY disprove Campbell et al but I remain unconvinced that all that famous Clementine CPR is water ice. As Dr Spudis has admitted, we won&#039;t know until we ground truth the observed data. I would strongly contend that much of the hydrogen will be in the form of simple or even complex hydrocarbons; mixed in with cyanogen, cyanide and other unpleasantness. As I commented to Dr Spudis it may well be that the cometary deposits will be of greater value to science as a long term record of Lunar impactors and Cometary activity than as a cheap source of rocket fuel. 
If there is one commodity that ought to be regarded as &#039;Common Heritage&#039; it is Lunar Hydrogen. The Isp of Nanoparticulate Aluminium and LUNOX is more than adequate to the purpose. /rant

Until the robots build the Mass Driver...

I would finish by returning to elaborate on a previous contention. That sending humans to probably the coldest spot in the solar system remains a non starter and most robotic TeleOps can be carried out from Earth. 

A ProxOps polar sample return mission to a circling CEV or international DSV (1) might be amusing conceit though.

(1) &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11304559&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Manned flight around Moon considered&lt;/a&gt;

One is not inspired by a commentator that can&#039;t even get a six letter nethandle right. It&#039;s brobof.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anne Spudis wrote @ October 11th, 2010 at 9:05 am<br />
It&#8217;s not research. It was, as I said, a simple calculation. But don&#8217;t take my word for it! I invite you to calculate, given the well publicised figure by you know who, just how many cubic km of water there is.<br />
Then find a reservoir with that capacity.<br />
That is a simple measure of the supported population. Like the reservoir I cite: Windermere, I reserve a deal of the water for recreational use!</p>
<p>Alas the paper you cite does not appear to give any estimate as to the quantity of water on the Moon and is therefore irrelevant to the discussion. I would add that the cited data MAY disprove Campbell et al but I remain unconvinced that all that famous Clementine CPR is water ice. As Dr Spudis has admitted, we won&#8217;t know until we ground truth the observed data. I would strongly contend that much of the hydrogen will be in the form of simple or even complex hydrocarbons; mixed in with cyanogen, cyanide and other unpleasantness. As I commented to Dr Spudis it may well be that the cometary deposits will be of greater value to science as a long term record of Lunar impactors and Cometary activity than as a cheap source of rocket fuel.<br />
If there is one commodity that ought to be regarded as &#8216;Common Heritage&#8217; it is Lunar Hydrogen. The Isp of Nanoparticulate Aluminium and LUNOX is more than adequate to the purpose. /rant</p>
<p>Until the robots build the Mass Driver&#8230;</p>
<p>I would finish by returning to elaborate on a previous contention. That sending humans to probably the coldest spot in the solar system remains a non starter and most robotic TeleOps can be carried out from Earth. </p>
<p>A ProxOps polar sample return mission to a circling CEV or international DSV (1) might be amusing conceit though.</p>
<p>(1) <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-11304559" rel="nofollow">Manned flight around Moon considered</a></p>
<p>One is not inspired by a commentator that can&#8217;t even get a six letter nethandle right. It&#8217;s brobof.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne Spudis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/08/hutchison-praises-nasa-bill-wolf-worries-about-china/#comment-330472</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anne Spudis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4003#comment-330472</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn wrote @ October 11th, 2010 at 1:55 pm [.....Of course, none of this being discussed involves humans in the loop.]

The title of the interview with Yu is:

&quot;Chinese scientists dream of man on the moon&quot; 
http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2010-10/580517.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ferris Valyn wrote @ October 11th, 2010 at 1:55 pm [&#8230;..Of course, none of this being discussed involves humans in the loop.]</p>
<p>The title of the interview with Yu is:</p>
<p>&#8220;Chinese scientists dream of man on the moon&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2010-10/580517.html" rel="nofollow">http://opinion.globaltimes.cn/commentary/2010-10/580517.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
