<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brief notes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=brief-notes-2</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beancounter from Downunder</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331816</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beancounter from Downunder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Nov 2010 01:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331816</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit OT but:
you know, just a thought.  I wonder if there are any organisations who would be willing to fly as crew on a SpaceX Falcon/Dragon to  a Bigelow space station (Sundancer due for launch 2014 but with slip, say 2015/16) without a LAS of any sort.
With Dragon Cargo just about ready to go, and say it&#039;s successful (no reason why not), there will be a dozen or more launch and returns before it&#039;s called on to do crew.  Suppose it&#039;s 100% succcessful.  All you need is an upgraded life support and seats to handle crew.  Nothing else since Dragon Cargo does everything autonomously.  The LES; actually for Dragon it&#039;s more than just launch since it&#039;s all the way to orbit; is the long timeframe and expensive item holding Dragon Crew up.

Shuttle flys without one!!
Well!!?  Any takers??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A bit OT but:<br />
you know, just a thought.  I wonder if there are any organisations who would be willing to fly as crew on a SpaceX Falcon/Dragon to  a Bigelow space station (Sundancer due for launch 2014 but with slip, say 2015/16) without a LAS of any sort.<br />
With Dragon Cargo just about ready to go, and say it&#8217;s successful (no reason why not), there will be a dozen or more launch and returns before it&#8217;s called on to do crew.  Suppose it&#8217;s 100% succcessful.  All you need is an upgraded life support and seats to handle crew.  Nothing else since Dragon Cargo does everything autonomously.  The LES; actually for Dragon it&#8217;s more than just launch since it&#8217;s all the way to orbit; is the long timeframe and expensive item holding Dragon Crew up.</p>
<p>Shuttle flys without one!!<br />
Well!!?  Any takers??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[t/Space was never a &quot;business.&quot;  It was an alliance of companies flying in loose formation.  It could be reassembled quite easily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>t/Space was never a &#8220;business.&#8221;  It was an alliance of companies flying in loose formation.  It could be reassembled quite easily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331781</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Martijn Meijering wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 7:07 pm

&quot;Maybe they went into hibernation as a paper business for a while, with the owners employed elsewhere?&quot;

Yep could be.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Martijn Meijering wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 7:07 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;Maybe they went into hibernation as a paper business for a while, with the owners employed elsewhere?&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep could be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Meijering</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331780</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martijn Meijering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331780</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe they went into hibernation as a paper business for a while, with the owners employed elsewhere?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe they went into hibernation as a paper business for a while, with the owners employed elsewhere?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331777</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ Martijn Meijering wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 6:03 pm

&quot;t/Space is on the list of companies expressing interest in CCDev 2.&quot;

Okay then. Good for them! I thought they went out of business but maybe I just misunderstood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Martijn Meijering wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 6:03 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;t/Space is on the list of companies expressing interest in CCDev 2.&#8221;</p>
<p>Okay then. Good for them! I thought they went out of business but maybe I just misunderstood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Meijering</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331774</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martijn Meijering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 22:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[t/Space is on the list of companies expressing interest in CCDev 2.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>t/Space is on the list of companies expressing interest in CCDev 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331771</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:47:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331771</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@  Vladislaw wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 12:30 pm

I believe t/Space is out of business after losing the CEV but I am not sure. I also doubt they will go this route. But just a hunch. Don&#039;t know.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@  Vladislaw wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 12:30 pm</p>
<p>I believe t/Space is out of business after losing the CEV but I am not sure. I also doubt they will go this route. But just a hunch. Don&#8217;t know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331763</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331763</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[eh wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 2:45 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Sounds like Congress was anticipating the stretched tank given the language.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I think all Congress was anticipating was how to keep certain constituents (people and companies) in the loop after the end of Constellation.  We&#039;ll see soon if that worked...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>eh wrote @ October 30th, 2010 at 2:45 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Sounds like Congress was anticipating the stretched tank given the language.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I think all Congress was anticipating was how to keep certain constituents (people and companies) in the loop after the end of Constellation.  We&#8217;ll see soon if that worked&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eh</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331761</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[100mt first stage is listed in the HEFT chart as a stretched tank with 5 segment.   That will get them to 130mt in the chart with a J2x second stage.  Sounds like Congress was anticipating the stretched tank given the language.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>100mt first stage is listed in the HEFT chart as a stretched tank with 5 segment.   That will get them to 130mt in the chart with a J2x second stage.  Sounds like Congress was anticipating the stretched tank given the language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladislaw</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/10/28/brief-notes-2/#comment-331753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:30:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4042#comment-331753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Burt Rutan and T.space had proposed an air launched system for the CEV program. It required a large launch plane. Virgin has the large launch plane now. The two companies Branson refers to is probably these two companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burt Rutan and T.space had proposed an air launched system for the CEV program. It required a large launch plane. Virgin has the large launch plane now. The two companies Branson refers to is probably these two companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
