<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who will be the new leadership of the House Science Committee?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332829</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;You attack me like pit bulls every chance because my comments reveal what your real agendas are.&lt;/em&gt;

And you say &lt;b&gt;you&#039;re&lt;/b&gt; laughing out loud?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>You attack me like pit bulls every chance because my comments reveal what your real agendas are.</em></p>
<p>And you say <b>you&#8217;re</b> laughing out loud?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelC</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332801</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 05:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332801</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL

I have for months been reading the regulars post here and been amused at their repeated displays of gullibility concerning commercial space schemes. You attack me like pit bulls every chance because my comments reveal what your real agendas are.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL</p>
<p>I have for months been reading the regulars post here and been amused at their repeated displays of gullibility concerning commercial space schemes. You attack me like pit bulls every chance because my comments reveal what your real agendas are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332735</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;I will be on your side in this.&lt;/em&gt;

Sorry, but I don&#039;t want someone so completely clueless about space technology, launch economics, and logic on my side.  I&#039;d rather you unwittingly sabotage the enemy, as you do with almost every comment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>I will be on your side in this.</em></p>
<p>Sorry, but I don&#8217;t want someone so completely clueless about space technology, launch economics, and logic on my side.  I&#8217;d rather you unwittingly sabotage the enemy, as you do with almost every comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martijn Meijering</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332723</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martijn Meijering]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:35:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332723</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Well, letâ€™s slap a pair of 5 segments on a Delta IV heavy making it an actual heavy and go kick some asteroid ass. &lt;/i&gt;

I think you have an unhealthy fixation with 5 seg boosters. Why would you stick them on a Delta Heavy? To tear the core to pieces?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Well, letâ€™s slap a pair of 5 segments on a Delta IV heavy making it an actual heavy and go kick some asteroid ass. </i></p>
<p>I think you have an unhealthy fixation with 5 seg boosters. Why would you stick them on a Delta Heavy? To tear the core to pieces?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelC</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 23:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I would propose establishing a Space Guard for such purposes, 
A clean-sheet organization would be much more focused on the task than giving it to NASA or the Air Force &quot;

Well, let&#039;s slap a pair of 5 segments on a Delta IV heavy making it an actual heavy and go kick some asteroid ass. 

Sign me up Rand, I will work with you on this; as long as you allow for some kind of an HLV to put up the big pieces, and nuclear weapons/energy, I will be on your side in this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I would propose establishing a Space Guard for such purposes,<br />
A clean-sheet organization would be much more focused on the task than giving it to NASA or the Air Force &#8221;</p>
<p>Well, let&#8217;s slap a pair of 5 segments on a Delta IV heavy making it an actual heavy and go kick some asteroid ass. </p>
<p>Sign me up Rand, I will work with you on this; as long as you allow for some kind of an HLV to put up the big pieces, and nuclear weapons/energy, I will be on your side in this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;1) I would assume that you agree that planetary protection is a legitimate and necessary function for the Federal government. True?&lt;/em&gt;

False.  Protection of the nation is a legitimate and necessary function of the federal government, not the planet.  For instance, if we knew that a city in (say) China was going to be hit by a smallish object, there would be no constitutional responsibility for the federal government to do anything about it.  Which isn&#039;t to say that we wouldn&#039;t, of course.  

But there is currently no agency in the federal government with a charter for protecting either the nation, or the planet, from extraterrestrial events, and none that I would trust with the job.  I would propose establishing a Space Guard for such purposes, under DHS (or better yet, Commerce, if we can get rid of DHS), attach it to the Air Force in the same manner as the Coast Guard supports the Navy, and restructuring federal space policy in the process.  It would pick up a lot of what NASA and the Air Force (and Commerce, and DOT) currently do, and have that new responsibility as well.  

A clean-sheet organization would be much more focused on the task than giving it to NASA or the Air Force (this is why, for example, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization was established in the eighties -- because it was clear that the Air Force wasn&#039;t interested in the job).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>1) I would assume that you agree that planetary protection is a legitimate and necessary function for the Federal government. True?</em></p>
<p>False.  Protection of the nation is a legitimate and necessary function of the federal government, not the planet.  For instance, if we knew that a city in (say) China was going to be hit by a smallish object, there would be no constitutional responsibility for the federal government to do anything about it.  Which isn&#8217;t to say that we wouldn&#8217;t, of course.  </p>
<p>But there is currently no agency in the federal government with a charter for protecting either the nation, or the planet, from extraterrestrial events, and none that I would trust with the job.  I would propose establishing a Space Guard for such purposes, under DHS (or better yet, Commerce, if we can get rid of DHS), attach it to the Air Force in the same manner as the Coast Guard supports the Navy, and restructuring federal space policy in the process.  It would pick up a lot of what NASA and the Air Force (and Commerce, and DOT) currently do, and have that new responsibility as well.  </p>
<p>A clean-sheet organization would be much more focused on the task than giving it to NASA or the Air Force (this is why, for example, the Ballistic Missile Defense Organization was established in the eighties &#8212; because it was clear that the Air Force wasn&#8217;t interested in the job).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332689</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 21:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332689</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Byeman,  you&#039;re right that finding these things is NASA&#039;s responsibility. But NASA&#039;s responsibilities do not end there. Better go back an look at the language of the George Brown Jr. amendment, and the followup setting up the PPCO, and the PPCO response&#039;s proposed allocation of tasks.

I did not thank you for replying to the questions to Rand. Care to take a try at answering them?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byeman,  you&#8217;re right that finding these things is NASA&#8217;s responsibility. But NASA&#8217;s responsibilities do not end there. Better go back an look at the language of the George Brown Jr. amendment, and the followup setting up the PPCO, and the PPCO response&#8217;s proposed allocation of tasks.</p>
<p>I did not thank you for replying to the questions to Rand. Care to take a try at answering them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byeman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332666</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332666</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Byeman, the Congress disagrees with you&quot;

No, it doesn&#039;t.  Nowhere does it say NASA is going to defend the US against .  It only tells NASA to look for potential objects.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Byeman, the Congress disagrees with you&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it doesn&#8217;t.  Nowhere does it say NASA is going to defend the US against .  It only tells NASA to look for potential objects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MichaelC</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332655</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MichaelC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 16:36:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Oh, and the majority of what you propose is related to leaving the Earth, not protecting it, so donâ€™t think youâ€™re riding some sort of high horse on that subject.&quot;

The threat is in space- you have to leave earth to intercept the threat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Oh, and the majority of what you propose is related to leaving the Earth, not protecting it, so donâ€™t think youâ€™re riding some sort of high horse on that subject.&#8221;</p>
<p>The threat is in space- you have to leave earth to intercept the threat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2010/11/09/who-will-be-the-new-leadership-of-the-house-science-committee/#comment-332648</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4082#comment-332648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Byeman, the Congress disagrees with you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byeman, the Congress disagrees with you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
