<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bolden interview; Nelson criticism; Supreme Court&#8217;s NASA decision</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wiser</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Wiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 02:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably because Van Allen had seen what those cameras showed. I wonder how long he had that anti-camera attitude? You do mean the Galileo mission, don&#039;t you? If it took him that long to see the merits of cameras on planetary probes....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably because Van Allen had seen what those cameras showed. I wonder how long he had that anti-camera attitude? You do mean the Galileo mission, don&#8217;t you? If it took him that long to see the merits of cameras on planetary probes&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladislaw</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338466</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early on Van Allen was anti camera but by the time of the Jupiter Orbiter he was on board with it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Early on Van Allen was anti camera but by the time of the Jupiter Orbiter he was on board with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wiser</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338445</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Wiser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 03:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least Bolden finally admitted the disaster that was the FY 11 original budget request. Even the 15 Apr &quot;Space Summit&quot; revised budget was DOA on the Hill, and he hasn&#039;t admitted that, either. A real Space Summit (instead of preaching to the choir like they did at the Cape that day)  is what&#039;s needed, and the new NASA Authorization Act calls for one, IIRC. 

Sagan and James Van Allen had the same attiude on HSF: openly hostile. Van Allen was even against cameras on unmanned probes, or so it&#039;s been said.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At least Bolden finally admitted the disaster that was the FY 11 original budget request. Even the 15 Apr &#8220;Space Summit&#8221; revised budget was DOA on the Hill, and he hasn&#8217;t admitted that, either. A real Space Summit (instead of preaching to the choir like they did at the Cape that day)  is what&#8217;s needed, and the new NASA Authorization Act calls for one, IIRC. </p>
<p>Sagan and James Van Allen had the same attiude on HSF: openly hostile. Van Allen was even against cameras on unmanned probes, or so it&#8217;s been said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Glover</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338400</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Glover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 02:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338400</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And interestingly, I just ran across this video with Neil deGrasse Tyson on The Value Of NASA::

http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/tyson20110120

...But I still say he has the vision, but not necessarily the ability to get down and dirty and administrate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And interestingly, I just ran across this video with Neil deGrasse Tyson on The Value Of NASA::</p>
<p><a href="http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/tyson20110120" rel="nofollow">http://ieet.org/index.php/IEET/more/tyson20110120</a></p>
<p>&#8230;But I still say he has the vision, but not necessarily the ability to get down and dirty and administrate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Glover</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338395</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frank Glover]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Jan 2011 00:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;If Bolden is the best man for the job, so be it, but I think someone with a more scientific background would do better for the new direction. Is Neil deGrasse Tyson looking for a job?&quot;

Heaven knows I respect Neil, he&#039;s &#039;s inherited the space scientific popularizer mantle of Carl Sagan, and handles that quite well. But what are his management skills/experience? Engineering skills/experience? Political interfacing skills/experience? Does he support government HSF? (Sagan absolutely didn&#039;t, except for its alleged &#039;international cooperation&#039; value) Does he &#039;get&#039; commercial HSF?

I could be wrong, but I&#039;m not so sure of all that...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Bolden is the best man for the job, so be it, but I think someone with a more scientific background would do better for the new direction. Is Neil deGrasse Tyson looking for a job?&#8221;</p>
<p>Heaven knows I respect Neil, he&#8217;s &#8216;s inherited the space scientific popularizer mantle of Carl Sagan, and handles that quite well. But what are his management skills/experience? Engineering skills/experience? Political interfacing skills/experience? Does he support government HSF? (Sagan absolutely didn&#8217;t, except for its alleged &#8216;international cooperation&#8217; value) Does he &#8216;get&#8217; commercial HSF?</p>
<p>I could be wrong, but I&#8217;m not so sure of all that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338363</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:09:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338363</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are more than a few people running around Brevard County who think we&#039;re about to blow away into dust because the Republicans claim it is so.  I had a young woman who&#039;s apolitical tell me the other day she was thinking about moving away to find work because her parents told her this county was going to be a ghost town once Shuttle stopped flying.  I explained to her all the commercial business coming to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and the jobs coming with them.  Her parents never told her about any of that.

Not to mention 20% of our population is over 65; if your career skills are health care, that&#039;s a boom industry here.

And the &lt;a href=&quot;http://disneycruise.disney.go.com/ships-activities/ships/dream/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Disney &lt;i&gt;Dream&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt; mega-cruise ship that just arrived, bring another 1,400 jobs.

Five years from now, this county will be booming and all the lies will have been exposed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are more than a few people running around Brevard County who think we&#8217;re about to blow away into dust because the Republicans claim it is so.  I had a young woman who&#8217;s apolitical tell me the other day she was thinking about moving away to find work because her parents told her this county was going to be a ghost town once Shuttle stopped flying.  I explained to her all the commercial business coming to Cape Canaveral Air Force Station and the jobs coming with them.  Her parents never told her about any of that.</p>
<p>Not to mention 20% of our population is over 65; if your career skills are health care, that&#8217;s a boom industry here.</p>
<p>And the <a href="http://disneycruise.disney.go.com/ships-activities/ships/dream/" rel="nofollow">Disney <i>Dream</i></a> mega-cruise ship that just arrived, bring another 1,400 jobs.</p>
<p>Five years from now, this county will be booming and all the lies will have been exposed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 18:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler wrote @ January 20th, 2011 at 4:40 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;goofy â€œgolf balls fly fartherâ€? Gee&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Actually it is a spinoff.  Back in the 80&#039;s &amp; 90&#039;s the golf ball companies put a lot of effort into understanding how the size, shape and placement of dimples on golf balls affected their performance.  Big money in them balls, and lots of competition, so they look for any advantages they can find - aerodynamics is just one.  Reid must be a golfer...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert G. Oler wrote @ January 20th, 2011 at 4:40 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>goofy â€œgolf balls fly fartherâ€? Gee</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually it is a spinoff.  Back in the 80&#8217;s &amp; 90&#8217;s the golf ball companies put a lot of effort into understanding how the size, shape and placement of dimples on golf balls affected their performance.  Big money in them balls, and lots of competition, so they look for any advantages they can find &#8211; aerodynamics is just one.  Reid must be a golfer&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladislaw</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338311</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 01:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[amightywind wrote @ January 20th, 2011 at 8:08 am

â€œThe spacecoast will soon be a ghost town thanks to Obamaâ€™s pogrom.â€

&lt;a HREF=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pogrom&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Pogrom&lt;/A&gt;

&lt;I&gt;&quot;A pogrom (Russian: Ð¿Ð¾Ð³Ñ€Ð¾Ð¼) is a form of violent riot, a mob attack, either approved or condoned by government or military authorities, directed against a particular group, whether ethnic, religious, or other, and characterized by killings and destruction of their homes and properties, businesses, and religious centres. The term usually carries connotation of spontaneous hatred within the majority population against certain (usually ethnic) minorities, which they see as dangerous and harming the interests of majority.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

So let me get this straight, the space coast is going to become a ghost town because President Obama is going to look the other way as hundreds of thousands of people are going to be murdered by commercial space advocates. Then all the homes will be burned to the ground and all government NASA facilites with destroyed?

I have to agree with what Das Boese wrote:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;That word doesnâ€™t mean what you think it means.
Itâ€™s a good idea to be aware of historical context and connotations of words before you carelessly slap them in a sentence for dramatic effect.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amightywind wrote @ January 20th, 2011 at 8:08 am</p>
<p>â€œThe spacecoast will soon be a ghost town thanks to Obamaâ€™s pogrom.â€</p>
<p><a HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pogrom" rel="nofollow">Pogrom</a></p>
<p><i>&#8220;A pogrom (Russian: Ð¿Ð¾Ð³Ñ€Ð¾Ð¼) is a form of violent riot, a mob attack, either approved or condoned by government or military authorities, directed against a particular group, whether ethnic, religious, or other, and characterized by killings and destruction of their homes and properties, businesses, and religious centres. The term usually carries connotation of spontaneous hatred within the majority population against certain (usually ethnic) minorities, which they see as dangerous and harming the interests of majority.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>So let me get this straight, the space coast is going to become a ghost town because President Obama is going to look the other way as hundreds of thousands of people are going to be murdered by commercial space advocates. Then all the homes will be burned to the ground and all government NASA facilites with destroyed?</p>
<p>I have to agree with what Das Boese wrote:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;That word doesnâ€™t mean what you think it means.<br />
Itâ€™s a good idea to be aware of historical context and connotations of words before you carelessly slap them in a sentence for dramatic effect.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338310</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 00:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338310</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[amightywind wrote @ January 20th, 2011 at 6:21 pm



It is one thing to be a fan, it is another to be in denial....

LOL that from a person who had the Falcon 9 second stage spinning out of control...

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amightywind wrote @ January 20th, 2011 at 6:21 pm</p>
<p>It is one thing to be a fan, it is another to be in denial&#8230;.</p>
<p>LOL that from a person who had the Falcon 9 second stage spinning out of control&#8230;</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James T</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/01/20/bolden-interview-nelson-criticism-supreme-courts-nasa-decision/#comment-338307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2011 23:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4317#comment-338307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They wouldn&#039;t kick Bolden any time soon anyways. If Obama replaced him, he would replace him with someone else in support of the new direction for NASA. It would just be another guy making the same decisions and under the same congressional heat. And who would want to take the job? In a country as crazy as ours it&#039;s hard to predict what the political climate will be like in two years at the start of the next presidential term, with a different looking House, Senete and possibly oval office. Where&#039;s the job security? They&#039;ll let Bolden finish out Obama&#039;s first (possibly only) term, then if they want a change they&#039;ll make a change. The current authorization act (if not replaced) expires after 2013, making the start of the next term the perfect time for a fresh budget proposal and maybe a fresh face. 

If my wildest dreams come true, zombie Constellation will already be put to rest, SpaceX will have made great success fulfilling their cargo contract and making progress on crew capabilities. NASA will be primed to push forward with a robust science and exploration agenda, focusing on the missions themselves and getting good &#039;ole fashioned American industry to get us there. If Bolden is the best man for the job, so be it, but I think someone with a more scientific background would do better for the new direction. Is Neil deGrasse Tyson looking for a job?

If my darkest nightmares come to be, we will have committed ourselves to the money pit that is SLS. A new Republican controlled/dead-locked government is looking for money to pay off THEIR debts to the Chinese, and the name of the game is &quot;scorched Earth!&quot;  We pull the rug out from under our ISS partners and succeed our leadership in space to the Chinese, maybe in exchange for a little debt reduction. NASA starts to let out a death knell and with an economy still in the stink hole, commercial space has no demand to supply.

... That&#039;s worst case scenario... it can&#039;t get that bad... could it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They wouldn&#8217;t kick Bolden any time soon anyways. If Obama replaced him, he would replace him with someone else in support of the new direction for NASA. It would just be another guy making the same decisions and under the same congressional heat. And who would want to take the job? In a country as crazy as ours it&#8217;s hard to predict what the political climate will be like in two years at the start of the next presidential term, with a different looking House, Senete and possibly oval office. Where&#8217;s the job security? They&#8217;ll let Bolden finish out Obama&#8217;s first (possibly only) term, then if they want a change they&#8217;ll make a change. The current authorization act (if not replaced) expires after 2013, making the start of the next term the perfect time for a fresh budget proposal and maybe a fresh face. </p>
<p>If my wildest dreams come true, zombie Constellation will already be put to rest, SpaceX will have made great success fulfilling their cargo contract and making progress on crew capabilities. NASA will be primed to push forward with a robust science and exploration agenda, focusing on the missions themselves and getting good &#8216;ole fashioned American industry to get us there. If Bolden is the best man for the job, so be it, but I think someone with a more scientific background would do better for the new direction. Is Neil deGrasse Tyson looking for a job?</p>
<p>If my darkest nightmares come to be, we will have committed ourselves to the money pit that is SLS. A new Republican controlled/dead-locked government is looking for money to pay off THEIR debts to the Chinese, and the name of the game is &#8220;scorched Earth!&#8221;  We pull the rug out from under our ISS partners and succeed our leadership in space to the Chinese, maybe in exchange for a little debt reduction. NASA starts to let out a death knell and with an economy still in the stink hole, commercial space has no demand to supply.</p>
<p>&#8230; That&#8217;s worst case scenario&#8230; it can&#8217;t get that bad&#8230; could it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
