<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NOAA and DOD highlights</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/02/15/noaa-and-dod-highlights/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/02/15/noaa-and-dod-highlights/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=noaa-and-dod-highlights</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byeman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/02/15/noaa-and-dod-highlights/#comment-340108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 03:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4443#comment-340108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I  wonder when the DoD will decide the EELV program is too expensive and fund an alternative.&#039;

Never.  It isn&#039;t &quot;too&quot; expensive&quot;.  Not anymore than Titan IV, Atlas II and Delta II.

F9 can&#039;t do most of the DOD missions and it is not a given that it would be any better]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I  wonder when the DoD will decide the EELV program is too expensive and fund an alternative.&#8217;</p>
<p>Never.  It isn&#8217;t &#8220;too&#8221; expensive&#8221;.  Not anymore than Titan IV, Atlas II and Delta II.</p>
<p>F9 can&#8217;t do most of the DOD missions and it is not a given that it would be any better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirgilSamms</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/02/15/noaa-and-dod-highlights/#comment-340097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[VirgilSamms]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 02:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4443#comment-340097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have to get the taxpayers to build that &quot;Merlin 2&quot; I guess. Then he can charge us for using it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to get the taxpayers to build that &#8220;Merlin 2&#8243; I guess. Then he can charge us for using it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beancounter from Downunder</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/02/15/noaa-and-dod-highlights/#comment-340089</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beancounter from Downunder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Feb 2011 01:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4443#comment-340089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder when the DoD will decide the EELV program is too expensive and fund an alternative.  They don&#039;t have to fund an entire clean sheet system since all the SpaceX F9 (which is quite a bit less expensive than any of the EELv&#039;s) requires is their Merlin 2 but that&#039;s a big job and doesn&#039;t appear to be on their current horizon just yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder when the DoD will decide the EELV program is too expensive and fund an alternative.  They don&#8217;t have to fund an entire clean sheet system since all the SpaceX F9 (which is quite a bit less expensive than any of the EELv&#8217;s) requires is their Merlin 2 but that&#8217;s a big job and doesn&#8217;t appear to be on their current horizon just yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
