<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NASA FY12 budget hearing Monday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343754</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 17:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343754</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bolden sprouts some leadership and/or innovation, chug the bottle!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bolden sprouts some leadership and/or innovation, chug the bottle!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ferris Valyn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ferris Valyn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Mikulski - what happened to flexibility?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Mikulski &#8211; what happened to flexibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aggelos</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343713</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aggelos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 06:13:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343713</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I was with Direct concept shuttle derived Hlv ..

but after 53 t falcon heavy ...no longer..

maybe nasa have to give most money to payloads in space spacecrafts  robots etc.

thats my opinion as a simple space enthusiast..

and leave Heavy launchers to Spacex..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was with Direct concept shuttle derived Hlv ..</p>
<p>but after 53 t falcon heavy &#8230;no longer..</p>
<p>maybe nasa have to give most money to payloads in space spacecrafts  robots etc.</p>
<p>thats my opinion as a simple space enthusiast..</p>
<p>and leave Heavy launchers to Spacex..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343710</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 05:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ amightywind wrote @ April 11th, 2011 at 7:42 pm

&quot;You are very perceptive.&quot;

Yep, just don&#039;t forget it ;) 

&quot;But donâ€™t worry. Iâ€™ll soon be back to full strength.&quot;

I don&#039;t. I&#039;ve seen your desperate yet entertaining enthusiasm before and I expect more. I wonder if you can best yourself though. Because this tired tirade was not very good you know. But in all cases be well soon, I don&#039;t want to miss the fun. Skiing was not all that fun then? Could it be a bug from Global Warming? Nah, come to think of it if you don&#039;t believe there is any then there cannot be any bug related to Global Warming in the air.

&quot;This spring season of politics is going to the best best in a long time.&quot;

I am not so sure about that. Well let me rephrase. You may make it entertaining as always but substantially speaking it does not look that interesting. More government shutdown on the horizon? More political nonsense when they make history and cut another few billions putting more people at risk with health coverage and retirement and job loss? It seems to me that some one already pronounced the last rites for this Congress. I am personally more interested in the next presidential elections. Trump vs Romney vs Palin vs Bachman. At least there is hope we don&#039;t have Palin now that Trump may be running. But it gives a clear idea of the depth of the political discourse from the GOP. I am not sure it still qualifies as &quot;depth&quot; though. I digress sorry. Well maybe we&#039;ll see Hutchinson ask Bolden yet another time whether NASA is wasting money. The real fun would be if he says yes but it won&#039;t happen. Too bad.

Anyway, again be well soon.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ amightywind wrote @ April 11th, 2011 at 7:42 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;You are very perceptive.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep, just don&#8217;t forget it <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";)" class="wp-smiley" /> </p>
<p>&#8220;But donâ€™t worry. Iâ€™ll soon be back to full strength.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t. I&#8217;ve seen your desperate yet entertaining enthusiasm before and I expect more. I wonder if you can best yourself though. Because this tired tirade was not very good you know. But in all cases be well soon, I don&#8217;t want to miss the fun. Skiing was not all that fun then? Could it be a bug from Global Warming? Nah, come to think of it if you don&#8217;t believe there is any then there cannot be any bug related to Global Warming in the air.</p>
<p>&#8220;This spring season of politics is going to the best best in a long time.&#8221;</p>
<p>I am not so sure about that. Well let me rephrase. You may make it entertaining as always but substantially speaking it does not look that interesting. More government shutdown on the horizon? More political nonsense when they make history and cut another few billions putting more people at risk with health coverage and retirement and job loss? It seems to me that some one already pronounced the last rites for this Congress. I am personally more interested in the next presidential elections. Trump vs Romney vs Palin vs Bachman. At least there is hope we don&#8217;t have Palin now that Trump may be running. But it gives a clear idea of the depth of the political discourse from the GOP. I am not sure it still qualifies as &#8220;depth&#8221; though. I digress sorry. Well maybe we&#8217;ll see Hutchinson ask Bolden yet another time whether NASA is wasting money. The real fun would be if he says yes but it won&#8217;t happen. Too bad.</p>
<p>Anyway, again be well soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Major Tom</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Major Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Thanks for the link Dan Woodward.

Even I couldnâ€™t have said this more eloquently.&quot;

You also couldn&#039;t be more out of date.  That article is 14 months -- over a year -- old.

It&#039;s one thing to live in the past.  It&#039;s another to argue from it.

&quot;Now is the time to kill hobbyspace.&quot;

Agreed.  The amateurs in the Senate should not be designing the SLS.

Sigh...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Thanks for the link Dan Woodward.</p>
<p>Even I couldnâ€™t have said this more eloquently.&#8221;</p>
<p>You also couldn&#8217;t be more out of date.  That article is 14 months &#8212; over a year &#8212; old.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to live in the past.  It&#8217;s another to argue from it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Now is the time to kill hobbyspace.&#8221;</p>
<p>Agreed.  The amateurs in the Senate should not be designing the SLS.</p>
<p>Sigh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A_M_Swallow</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343704</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A_M_Swallow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343704</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Hatch may wish to get her staffers to ask JSC about cargo lunar landers.  In FY2012 something interesting may happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Senator Hatch may wish to get her staffers to ask JSC about cargo lunar landers.  In FY2012 something interesting may happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343702</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Apr 2011 00:17:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunately there are many within the space program who favor SLS and Orion despite its extreme cost and lack of practical value. It is a bitter irony that NASA, having been forced by Congress to waste billions on Constellation, now has to defend itself against waste. 

I know this may surprise people but there are hundreds of scientists and engineers at NASA with good ideas who can&#039;t get a thin dime because their projects, however valuable they might be to real people here on earth, aren&#039;t in the &quot;critical path&quot; to send a few civil servants to Mars.

On the bright side, the current crop of space launch companies seem competent and may actually succeed despite the best efforts of &quot;small government&quot; advocates like Senator Shelby and Congressman Posey.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately there are many within the space program who favor SLS and Orion despite its extreme cost and lack of practical value. It is a bitter irony that NASA, having been forced by Congress to waste billions on Constellation, now has to defend itself against waste. </p>
<p>I know this may surprise people but there are hundreds of scientists and engineers at NASA with good ideas who can&#8217;t get a thin dime because their projects, however valuable they might be to real people here on earth, aren&#8217;t in the &#8220;critical path&#8221; to send a few civil servants to Mars.</p>
<p>On the bright side, the current crop of space launch companies seem competent and may actually succeed despite the best efforts of &#8220;small government&#8221; advocates like Senator Shelby and Congressman Posey.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amightywind</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amightywind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;cite&gt;I am longing for the real amightywind to come back because this above sir only is a travesty of yourself.&lt;/cite&gt;

You are very perceptive. It is both a low day and I am under the weather. But don&#039;t worry. I&#039;ll soon be back to full strength. This spring season of politics is going to the best best in a long time.

As for the final disposition of the shuttles: One for KSC. They should build a facility like they have for the Saturn V. Nice. One for the Smithsonian. No brainer. One will go somewhere unexpected as an Obama political payoff. Sorry to disappoint you JSC, but you didn&#039;t take very good care of the Saturn V you were given. I was disappointed to see it covered with pigeon droppings. Good night!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>I am longing for the real amightywind to come back because this above sir only is a travesty of yourself.</cite></p>
<p>You are very perceptive. It is both a low day and I am under the weather. But don&#8217;t worry. I&#8217;ll soon be back to full strength. This spring season of politics is going to the best best in a long time.</p>
<p>As for the final disposition of the shuttles: One for KSC. They should build a facility like they have for the Saturn V. Nice. One for the Smithsonian. No brainer. One will go somewhere unexpected as an Obama political payoff. Sorry to disappoint you JSC, but you didn&#8217;t take very good care of the Saturn V you were given. I was disappointed to see it covered with pigeon droppings. Good night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aberwys</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343700</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aberwys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343700</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If anyone was with me at Lunch with Mikulski earlier today, did you notice that she repeated much of her apple pie talk in her opening remarks?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If anyone was with me at Lunch with Mikulski earlier today, did you notice that she repeated much of her apple pie talk in her opening remarks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/04/10/nasa-fy12-budget-hearing-monday/#comment-343699</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 23:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4609#comment-343699</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[amightywind wrote @ April 11th, 2011 at 4:55 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Thanks for the link Dan Woodward.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Indeed.  From the article:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;...Shelby blasted those companies and said rocket science was so complicated that it requires a government program.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

So here we have a senior Republican saying that government is the answer?  I guess you can&#039;t judge a book by it&#039;s cover, or in this case, a Senator by his party affiliation.

Of course Shelby is oblivious to the fact that the satellite industry doesn&#039;t rely on government programs, and that every major piece of space hardware has been built by commercial companies - paid for by government programs, but the talent is with the industry, not the government.  Clearly he&#039;s bloviating.

No wonder Windy identifies with Shelby so much...  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>amightywind wrote @ April 11th, 2011 at 4:55 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Thanks for the link Dan Woodward.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed.  From the article:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>&#8230;Shelby blasted those companies and said rocket science was so complicated that it requires a government program.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>So here we have a senior Republican saying that government is the answer?  I guess you can&#8217;t judge a book by it&#8217;s cover, or in this case, a Senator by his party affiliation.</p>
<p>Of course Shelby is oblivious to the fact that the satellite industry doesn&#8217;t rely on government programs, and that every major piece of space hardware has been built by commercial companies &#8211; paid for by government programs, but the talent is with the industry, not the government.  Clearly he&#8217;s bloviating.</p>
<p>No wonder Windy identifies with Shelby so much&#8230;  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
