<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The national space policy turns one</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-national-space-policy-turns-one</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Bass</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348876</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Bass]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 19:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348876</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=space&amp;id=news/asd/2011/07/08/01.xml&amp;headline=Heavy-Lift%20Rocket%20Decision%20Continues%20To%20Slip

This administration is inept....just what we need, more studies]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=space&#038;id=news/asd/2011/07/08/01.xml&#038;headline=Heavy-Lift%20Rocket%20Decision%20Continues%20To%20Slip" rel="nofollow">http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story_channel.jsp?channel=space&#038;id=news/asd/2011/07/08/01.xml&#038;headline=Heavy-Lift%20Rocket%20Decision%20Continues%20To%20Slip</a></p>
<p>This administration is inept&#8230;.just what we need, more studies</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348557</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 20:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348557</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OOPS! I made a mistake!
I goofed up.  I  had just glanced at Clark Lindsey&#039;s post about it.  Clark said he &lt;i&gt;wished&lt;/i&gt; Warner would compete the whole thing.  I misread his comment.  Sorry!  Need to quit trying to post while I&#039;m doing my research!  Can&#039;t give the it space news  the scrutiny it deserves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OOPS! I made a mistake!<br />
I goofed up.  I  had just glanced at Clark Lindsey&#8217;s post about it.  Clark said he <i>wished</i> Warner would compete the whole thing.  I misread his comment.  Sorry!  Need to quit trying to post while I&#8217;m doing my research!  Can&#8217;t give the it space news  the scrutiny it deserves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 19:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys, if you haven&#039;t seen the late breaking SLS news that I put in a comment under the SpacePolitics.com post &lt;i&gt;Briefly: Budget Turmoil, 2012 Lobbying&lt;/i&gt; go check it out.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys, if you haven&#8217;t seen the late breaking SLS news that I put in a comment under the SpacePolitics.com post <i>Briefly: Budget Turmoil, 2012 Lobbying</i> go check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348546</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 16:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348546</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Today the families of the crew of the Challenger disaster issued a statement in support of the commercial human  spaceflight effort.  Read it here:
http://www.challenger.org/about/media/release.cfm?release_id=166]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today the families of the crew of the Challenger disaster issued a statement in support of the commercial human  spaceflight effort.  Read it here:<br />
<a href="http://www.challenger.org/about/media/release.cfm?release_id=166" rel="nofollow">http://www.challenger.org/about/media/release.cfm?release_id=166</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pathfinder_01</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348543</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pathfinder_01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 06:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;DCSCA is still getting â€œupdatesâ€ from the Apollo program, so heâ€™s a little behind the timesâ€¦  &quot;


yeah someone should by him a digital clock. 

I agree that they are good at operations but design and build are different things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;DCSCA is still getting â€œupdatesâ€ from the Apollo program, so heâ€™s a little behind the timesâ€¦  &#8221;</p>
<p>yeah someone should by him a digital clock. </p>
<p>I agree that they are good at operations but design and build are different things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2011 04:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rick Boozer wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 5:28 pm

Put down the mirror. 1+1=2, not 11 amd your attempts at false equivalency are denser than Jupiter&#039;s atmosphere. You fly nobody. It comes down to this: Put someone up, or shut up. Until then, you have nothing but paper proposals, empty promises, go begging for government subsidies and boast of things to come-- like Fearless Leader retiring on Mars. And the Musketeers sing: â€œSay, itâ€™s only a paper moon/Sailing over a cardboard sea/But it wouldnâ€™t be make-believe/If you believed in me.â€  Tick-tock, tick-tock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rick Boozer wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 5:28 pm</p>
<p>Put down the mirror. 1+1=2, not 11 amd your attempts at false equivalency are denser than Jupiter&#8217;s atmosphere. You fly nobody. It comes down to this: Put someone up, or shut up. Until then, you have nothing but paper proposals, empty promises, go begging for government subsidies and boast of things to come&#8211; like Fearless Leader retiring on Mars. And the Musketeers sing: â€œSay, itâ€™s only a paper moon/Sailing over a cardboard sea/But it wouldnâ€™t be make-believe/If you believed in me.â€  Tick-tock, tick-tock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 22:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Boozer wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 5:28 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Are you [DCSCA] really that stupid?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

I think it&#039;s a mental issue, since he keeps repeating things.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;The current people at NASA are flying astronauts to orbit on a launcher developed by the previous generation before them.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

And substantially run by the same evil commercial aerospace industry that he like to rail against.

NASA does HSF program management, but they don&#039;t design and they don&#039;t build.

DCSCA is still getting &quot;updates&quot; from the Apollo program, so he&#039;s a little behind the times...  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Boozer wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 5:28 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Are you [DCSCA] really that stupid?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s a mental issue, since he keeps repeating things.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>The current people at NASA are flying astronauts to orbit on a launcher developed by the previous generation before them.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>And substantially run by the same evil commercial aerospace industry that he like to rail against.</p>
<p>NASA does HSF program management, but they don&#8217;t design and they don&#8217;t build.</p>
<p>DCSCA is still getting &#8220;updates&#8221; from the Apollo program, so he&#8217;s a little behind the times&#8230;  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348528</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:28:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348528</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@DCSCA wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 3:50 pm
&lt;i&gt;&quot;ROFLMAOPIP NASA has been flying people into and back from space for half a centuryâ€“ in that span of time to LEO and to the moon and back. Even the PRC is orbiting crews. Even Iran plans to loft monkeys into space. SpaceX has flown a wheel of cheese. &quot;&lt;/i&gt;

Are you really that stupid? Did you not comprehend what I wrote?  The current people at NASA are flying astronauts to orbit on a launcher developed by the previous generation &lt;i&gt;before them&lt;/i&gt;.  Because someone else previously at NASA could successfully build a launcher does &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; mean the current people know how to do it.  Launching a vehicle and developing a vehicle are two &lt;i&gt;different&lt;/i&gt; things.  It&#039;s a lot easier to maintain and use something than it is to create it.  I can maintain and drive my car without knowing how to build an automobile.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DCSCA wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 3:50 pm<br />
<i>&#8220;ROFLMAOPIP NASA has been flying people into and back from space for half a centuryâ€“ in that span of time to LEO and to the moon and back. Even the PRC is orbiting crews. Even Iran plans to loft monkeys into space. SpaceX has flown a wheel of cheese. &#8220;</i></p>
<p>Are you really that stupid? Did you not comprehend what I wrote?  The current people at NASA are flying astronauts to orbit on a launcher developed by the previous generation <i>before them</i>.  Because someone else previously at NASA could successfully build a launcher does <i>not</i> mean the current people know how to do it.  Launching a vehicle and developing a vehicle are two <i>different</i> things.  It&#8217;s a lot easier to maintain and use something than it is to create it.  I can maintain and drive my car without knowing how to build an automobile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348523</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Letâ€™s face it, human travel to LEO has been done for 50 years and has reached a point where it is not worthy of an agency that is supposed to be cutting edge as NASA is meant to be.&quot;

Not worthy??  High time YOU faced it. Just do it. Fly somebody. Take risk NASA did orbiting Glenn, when (per Kraft&#039;s memoirs) the reliability of missile technology at the time was 60% or so.  Get somebody up, around and back safely. So far, in 50 years, commercial HSF has failed to accomplish this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Letâ€™s face it, human travel to LEO has been done for 50 years and has reached a point where it is not worthy of an agency that is supposed to be cutting edge as NASA is meant to be.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not worthy??  High time YOU faced it. Just do it. Fly somebody. Take risk NASA did orbiting Glenn, when (per Kraft&#8217;s memoirs) the reliability of missile technology at the time was 60% or so.  Get somebody up, around and back safely. So far, in 50 years, commercial HSF has failed to accomplish this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/06/28/the-national-space-policy-turns-one/#comment-348522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 19:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=4811#comment-348522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Rick Boozer wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 9:20 am 

&quot;Face it, SpaceX is ahead right now in its efforts toward putting humans into orbit simply due to the fact that they have reached orbit and NASA (under management using traditional methods) has not.&quot;

ROFLMAOPIP NASA has been flying people into and back from space for half a century-- in that span of time to LEO and to the moon and back. Even the PRC is orbiting crews. Even Iran plans to loft monkeys into space. SpaceX has flown a wheel of cheese. 

It is mid-2011. Face it: SpaceX has not launched orbited and returned ANYBODY. NBC News has reported they won&#039;t even try for 4 to 5 years. It&#039;s false equivalency; it&#039;s empty promises; it&#039;s a paper space project, fueled by press releases. They fly nobody. .And the Musketeers continue to sing: â€œSay, itâ€™s only a paper moon/Sailing over a cardboard sea/But it wouldnâ€™t be make-believe/If you believed in me.â€ It comes dow to this: put somebody up or shut-up. Tick-tock, tick-tock...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rick Boozer wrote @ June 30th, 2011 at 9:20 am </p>
<p>&#8220;Face it, SpaceX is ahead right now in its efforts toward putting humans into orbit simply due to the fact that they have reached orbit and NASA (under management using traditional methods) has not.&#8221;</p>
<p>ROFLMAOPIP NASA has been flying people into and back from space for half a century&#8211; in that span of time to LEO and to the moon and back. Even the PRC is orbiting crews. Even Iran plans to loft monkeys into space. SpaceX has flown a wheel of cheese. </p>
<p>It is mid-2011. Face it: SpaceX has not launched orbited and returned ANYBODY. NBC News has reported they won&#8217;t even try for 4 to 5 years. It&#8217;s false equivalency; it&#8217;s empty promises; it&#8217;s a paper space project, fueled by press releases. They fly nobody. .And the Musketeers continue to sing: â€œSay, itâ€™s only a paper moon/Sailing over a cardboard sea/But it wouldnâ€™t be make-believe/If you believed in me.â€ It comes dow to this: put somebody up or shut-up. Tick-tock, tick-tock&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
