<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two themes from Wednesday&#8217;s CCDev hearing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-358231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 20:49:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-358231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[russell wrote @ December 3rd, 2011 at 2:11 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;I canâ€™t believe I had to explain what EVA was!&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

You didn&#039;t.  However you said &quot;EVA&quot; without any context - which post were you referring to, and what question were you answering?

You may have assumed you were answering a post that was at the end of a thread, but by the time your reply posted maybe it wouldn&#039;t have been directly above your post - you left us guessing.

Cryptic is fine, but context is everything.  Just add some context to your cryptic posts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>russell wrote @ December 3rd, 2011 at 2:11 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>I canâ€™t believe I had to explain what EVA was!</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>You didn&#8217;t.  However you said &#8220;EVA&#8221; without any context &#8211; which post were you referring to, and what question were you answering?</p>
<p>You may have assumed you were answering a post that was at the end of a thread, but by the time your reply posted maybe it wouldn&#8217;t have been directly above your post &#8211; you left us guessing.</p>
<p>Cryptic is fine, but context is everything.  Just add some context to your cryptic posts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: russell</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-358229</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Dec 2011 19:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-358229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#039;t believe I had to explain what EVA was!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe I had to explain what EVA was!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356956</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356956</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@  Russell wrote @ November 2nd, 2011 at 9:01 am 

&quot;Astronauts could â€œspacewalkâ€ to an ISS airlock, this is known as EVA.&quot;

Unrealistic. Unless you do not see your Gemini as a rescue vehicle as well. I doubt you&#039;d be able to spacewalk an injured/sick astronaut. And the whole ops may be very complicated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@  Russell wrote @ November 2nd, 2011 at 9:01 am </p>
<p>&#8220;Astronauts could â€œspacewalkâ€ to an ISS airlock, this is known as EVA.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unrealistic. Unless you do not see your Gemini as a rescue vehicle as well. I doubt you&#8217;d be able to spacewalk an injured/sick astronaut. And the whole ops may be very complicated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356955</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:01:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356955</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Astronauts could &quot;spacewalk&quot; to an ISS airlock, this is known as EVA.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Astronauts could &#8220;spacewalk&#8221; to an ISS airlock, this is known as EVA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356931</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 00:07:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356931</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Coastal Ron,

Too funny.  

EVA = Eventually Vultures Alight]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Coastal Ron,</p>
<p>Too funny.  </p>
<p>EVA = Eventually Vultures Alight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 20:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Russell wrote @ November 1st, 2011 at 3:43 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;EVA&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

YTC

Which stands for &quot;You&#039;re Too Cryptic&quot;.  Do you mean that EVA is a more economical way of creating a low cost crew transportation system, or you&#039;re expressing your love of Eva (all caps is a way of exclamation)?  TLI]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell wrote @ November 1st, 2011 at 3:43 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>EVA</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>YTC</p>
<p>Which stands for &#8220;You&#8217;re Too Cryptic&#8221;.  Do you mean that EVA is a more economical way of creating a low cost crew transportation system, or you&#8217;re expressing your love of Eva (all caps is a way of exclamation)?  TLI</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356916</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 19:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EVA]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>EVA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356862</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:33:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356862</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My point was I believe it had a docking port.  A two man vehicle with docking port could be built. It like anything else however needs FUNDING&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My point was I believe it had a docking port.  A two man vehicle with docking port could be built. It like anything else however needs FUNDING&gt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356861</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 10:31:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For a short time Boeing was illustrating a two man vehicle, again resembling Apollo, that would launch from the shuttle bay.  This would send astronauts once again out to the moon. It never materialized of course, but the idea was there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a short time Boeing was illustrating a two man vehicle, again resembling Apollo, that would launch from the shuttle bay.  This would send astronauts once again out to the moon. It never materialized of course, but the idea was there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/10/27/two-themes-from-wednesdays-ccdev-hearing/#comment-356846</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2011 03:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5108#comment-356846</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA wrote @ October 31st, 2011 at 5:00 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;In fact, for its time, the Agena had a â€˜docking port.â€™&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Anybody can use Wikipedia to look up 45 year old facts, and in your case it&#039;s totally irrelevant data since the topic of conversation is getting crew to a space station, not how to bump vehicle noses.  Try to keep up.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA wrote @ October 31st, 2011 at 5:00 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>In fact, for its time, the Agena had a â€˜docking port.â€™</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Anybody can use Wikipedia to look up 45 year old facts, and in your case it&#8217;s totally irrelevant data since the topic of conversation is getting crew to a space station, not how to bump vehicle noses.  Try to keep up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
