<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Minibus next stop: the House</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=minibus-next-stop-the-house</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beancounter from Downunder</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-357150</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Beancounter from Downunder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 01:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-357150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some posters should take a lesson in manners.  Just because you disagree with someone else&#039;s position, it&#039;s not a right to denigrate or belittle them.
How about taking a minute to think about this before you post?  Anger also doesn&#039;t excuse bad manners.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some posters should take a lesson in manners.  Just because you disagree with someone else&#8217;s position, it&#8217;s not a right to denigrate or belittle them.<br />
How about taking a minute to think about this before you post?  Anger also doesn&#8217;t excuse bad manners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-357014</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 22:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-357014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[GuessWho wrote @ November 3rd, 2011 at 8:26 am

Oler wrote: â€œSLS will die, WEbb changed.â€

whoever replied:
Yet another idiotic statement from RGO. JWST will not go through a design change due to budget pressures. It is a very specific design for a very specific application that passed CDR more than 16 months ago. They are now fabricating flight hardware and descope options are no longer an option (other than mission duration post-launch).

....

cost on Webb are going up monthly.  they might be putting together hardware but they have no idea what that hardware will cost...and as long as cost are going up just less then 1 billion a year...they will find they get to build less telescope if they build one at all.  I stand by my statement.

who 

Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GuessWho wrote @ November 3rd, 2011 at 8:26 am</p>
<p>Oler wrote: â€œSLS will die, WEbb changed.â€</p>
<p>whoever replied:<br />
Yet another idiotic statement from RGO. JWST will not go through a design change due to budget pressures. It is a very specific design for a very specific application that passed CDR more than 16 months ago. They are now fabricating flight hardware and descope options are no longer an option (other than mission duration post-launch).</p>
<p>&#8230;.</p>
<p>cost on Webb are going up monthly.  they might be putting together hardware but they have no idea what that hardware will cost&#8230;and as long as cost are going up just less then 1 billion a year&#8230;they will find they get to build less telescope if they build one at all.  I stand by my statement.</p>
<p>who </p>
<p>Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GuessWho</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-357000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GuessWho]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 12:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-357000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oler wrote:  &quot;SLS will die, WEbb changed.&quot;

Yet another idiotic statement from RGO.  JWST will not go through a design change due to budget pressures.  It is a very specific design for a very specific application that passed CDR more than 16 months ago.  They are now fabricating flight hardware and descope options are no longer an option (other than mission duration post-launch).

Stephen Smith wrote:  &quot;Theyâ€™re going to hold CCDev hostage until they get their SLS pork.&quot;

This would be the Democrat-led Senate porkers correct?  The same group (headed by Babs) that will make sure the white elephant called JWST also gets full funding despite cost increases of over $6.25B or 342% of its 2009 cost estimate and will now likely gut most of the other remaining and near-term SMD missions?  The same Democrat-led Senate porkers that have been in the majority and continued to feed the JWST trough since 2007?  Those porkers?  Sounds like the current Senate majority needs to be made the minority ASAP so we can cut the pork!  Given we are borrowing $0.42 for every dollar spent, this can&#039;t be done soon enough.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oler wrote:  &#8220;SLS will die, WEbb changed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yet another idiotic statement from RGO.  JWST will not go through a design change due to budget pressures.  It is a very specific design for a very specific application that passed CDR more than 16 months ago.  They are now fabricating flight hardware and descope options are no longer an option (other than mission duration post-launch).</p>
<p>Stephen Smith wrote:  &#8220;Theyâ€™re going to hold CCDev hostage until they get their SLS pork.&#8221;</p>
<p>This would be the Democrat-led Senate porkers correct?  The same group (headed by Babs) that will make sure the white elephant called JWST also gets full funding despite cost increases of over $6.25B or 342% of its 2009 cost estimate and will now likely gut most of the other remaining and near-term SMD missions?  The same Democrat-led Senate porkers that have been in the majority and continued to feed the JWST trough since 2007?  Those porkers?  Sounds like the current Senate majority needs to be made the minority ASAP so we can cut the pork!  Given we are borrowing $0.42 for every dollar spent, this can&#8217;t be done soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Teddy Ballgame</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Teddy Ballgame]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 10:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SLS will die, WEbb changed. RGO

And you also predicted SLS and Webb would be canceled by October.  Nostradamus you are not.  Now keep your pie hole shut.

Pathetic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SLS will die, WEbb changed. RGO</p>
<p>And you also predicted SLS and Webb would be canceled by October.  Nostradamus you are not.  Now keep your pie hole shut.</p>
<p>Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356986</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:04:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356986</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler wrote:

&lt;i&gt;SLS will die, WEbb changed.&lt;/i&gt;

I think it&#039;s pretty clear that the Congressional porkers will sacrifice everything else before they let anyone touch their precious SLS.

Quoting from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://spacereport.blogspot.com/2011/11/november-2-2011_02.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Florida SPACErePORT&lt;/a&gt; for November 2:

&lt;i&gt;The Senate has approved $500 million for &quot;commercial spaceflight activities,&quot; but with a caveat that $192.6 million cannot be spent until &quot;the NASA Administrator certifies to the Committees on Appropriations, in writing, that NASA has published the required notifications of NASA contract actions implementing the acquisition strategy for the heavy lift launch vehicle system.&quot; This move is intended to encourage NASA to move quickly on heavy-lift development. (11/2)&lt;/i&gt;

They&#039;re going to hold CCDev hostage until they get their SLS pork.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert G. Oler wrote:</p>
<p><i>SLS will die, WEbb changed.</i></p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s pretty clear that the Congressional porkers will sacrifice everything else before they let anyone touch their precious SLS.</p>
<p>Quoting from the <a href="http://spacereport.blogspot.com/2011/11/november-2-2011_02.html" rel="nofollow">Florida SPACErePORT</a> for November 2:</p>
<p><i>The Senate has approved $500 million for &#8220;commercial spaceflight activities,&#8221; but with a caveat that $192.6 million cannot be spent until &#8220;the NASA Administrator certifies to the Committees on Appropriations, in writing, that NASA has published the required notifications of NASA contract actions implementing the acquisition strategy for the heavy lift launch vehicle system.&#8221; This move is intended to encourage NASA to move quickly on heavy-lift development. (11/2)</i></p>
<p>They&#8217;re going to hold CCDev hostage until they get their SLS pork.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sftommy</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356985</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sftommy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 21:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356985</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This nation needs radical austerity.&quot;   BAD BAD BAD
...which leads to a contracting economy which leads to further austerity which leads to deflation and finally economic shutdown.  That thought is bad inspiration for business and helps prevent American pulling itself out of this mess.

Austerity is NOT what this country needs.

Poignant investment in new technologies and creation of new industries is what is needed (as well as tariff controls).  NASA is the best example of the success USA achieves when smart investment overcomes financial fears.

The sky is NOT falling in.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This nation needs radical austerity.&#8221;   BAD BAD BAD<br />
&#8230;which leads to a contracting economy which leads to further austerity which leads to deflation and finally economic shutdown.  That thought is bad inspiration for business and helps prevent American pulling itself out of this mess.</p>
<p>Austerity is NOT what this country needs.</p>
<p>Poignant investment in new technologies and creation of new industries is what is needed (as well as tariff controls).  NASA is the best example of the success USA achieves when smart investment overcomes financial fears.</p>
<p>The sky is NOT falling in.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356974</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 17:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356974</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Byeman wrote @ November 2nd, 2011 at 9:35 am

yes, and SLS should be first on the chopping block..

SLS will die, WEbb changed.  RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Byeman wrote @ November 2nd, 2011 at 9:35 am</p>
<p>yes, and SLS should be first on the chopping block..</p>
<p>SLS will die, WEbb changed.  RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356967</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 15:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356967</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agreed. SLS should be gutted along with Orion which could be leased out as a Disney ride.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. SLS should be gutted along with Orion which could be leased out as a Disney ride.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Byeman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356960</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Byeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356960</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yes, and SLS should be first on the chopping block]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, and SLS should be first on the chopping block</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/02/minibus-next-stop-the-house/#comment-356958</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2011 13:31:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5125#comment-356958</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;This nation needs radical austerity.&quot;

Yeah that will certainly pay for SLS/MPCV of your dreams...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This nation needs radical austerity.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yeah that will certainly pay for SLS/MPCV of your dreams&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
