<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A status report on NASA&#8217;s human spaceflight plans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-358126</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 16:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-358126</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA wrote @ November 28th, 2011 at 5:19 pm

You forgot: 4) Congress continues to spend $Billions on an unneeded government-owned, government-run rocket that Congress won&#039;t even appropriate money to use.

Of course really what you seem to be advocating is just shutting all government spending off, since NASA is no different than any other agency that is doing things &quot;for the greater good&quot;.  Good luck with that.

As far as the fiscal situation we find ourselves in, we&#039;ve survived much worse recessions and higher unemployment, and we&#039;ve incurred much higher national debt.  Chicken Little, and you, may think the sky is falling, but you&#039;re delusional.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA wrote @ November 28th, 2011 at 5:19 pm</p>
<p>You forgot: 4) Congress continues to spend $Billions on an unneeded government-owned, government-run rocket that Congress won&#8217;t even appropriate money to use.</p>
<p>Of course really what you seem to be advocating is just shutting all government spending off, since NASA is no different than any other agency that is doing things &#8220;for the greater good&#8221;.  Good luck with that.</p>
<p>As far as the fiscal situation we find ourselves in, we&#8217;ve survived much worse recessions and higher unemployment, and we&#8217;ve incurred much higher national debt.  Chicken Little, and you, may think the sky is falling, but you&#8217;re delusional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-358117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-358117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Americans struggle to make ends meet, with 25% of America&#039;s kids at or below the poverty level, NASA continuyes to be out of step with our austere times as it manages to get some press over the past 10 days with: 1. At $1800/oz., Congress hands out gold medals to well-to-do ancient astronauts who flew 40-50 years ago. 2. Launched a very spiffy-- and iffy-- $2.5 billion atomic rover to Mars as the nation teeters on the edge of bankruptcy. 3. Continues to try to justify massive cost overrruns for the Webb Space Telescope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Americans struggle to make ends meet, with 25% of America&#8217;s kids at or below the poverty level, NASA continuyes to be out of step with our austere times as it manages to get some press over the past 10 days with: 1. At $1800/oz., Congress hands out gold medals to well-to-do ancient astronauts who flew 40-50 years ago. 2. Launched a very spiffy&#8211; and iffy&#8211; $2.5 billion atomic rover to Mars as the nation teeters on the edge of bankruptcy. 3. Continues to try to justify massive cost overrruns for the Webb Space Telescope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-358101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Nov 2011 20:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-358101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 11:45 pm 


It bares repeating: â€œFirst I really dont care that we (the US or humanity or whatever) goes to the Moon or Mars or an asteroid in the next 10-20 years. I dont think that there is any need to send people we have good robotics which can do the job at far lower cost.â€  Now you&#039;ve added another &#039;goofy&#039; assertion: &quot;Goofy human spaceflight is not defined solely by human exploration of spaceâ€¦it is like saying â€œflying by humansâ€ is only test flying.&quot;  You&#039;ve established your own odd, isolated position with yourown words. .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert G. Oler wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 11:45 pm </p>
<p>It bares repeating: â€œFirst I really dont care that we (the US or humanity or whatever) goes to the Moon or Mars or an asteroid in the next 10-20 years. I dont think that there is any need to send people we have good robotics which can do the job at far lower cost.â€  Now you&#8217;ve added another &#8216;goofy&#8217; assertion: &#8220;Goofy human spaceflight is not defined solely by human exploration of spaceâ€¦it is like saying â€œflying by humansâ€ is only test flying.&#8221;  You&#8217;ve established your own odd, isolated position with yourown words. .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 11:11:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 9:14 pm

Robert G. Oler wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 2:03 pm

Weâ€™ve established your disdain for HSF using your own words on this forum; your denial of stated intent from the PRC on their mid-to-long-term plans for HSF&gt;&gt;

Words that you have taken out of context...as for &quot;stated intent&quot; it is goofy to believe the &quot;stated intent&quot; of a trading rival.  Only a goofer really tells you what they are planning to do...I guess when you were small you fell for that &quot;heh your shoe is untied&quot; bit quite a lot.

Only in your (and Wiser&#039;s and a few other goofy minds) is a statement that there is no need for human exploration of space a blanket disdain for human spaceflight...you probably believed that there was WMD in IRAQ.  RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 9:14 pm</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 2:03 pm</p>
<p>Weâ€™ve established your disdain for HSF using your own words on this forum; your denial of stated intent from the PRC on their mid-to-long-term plans for HSF&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>Words that you have taken out of context&#8230;as for &#8220;stated intent&#8221; it is goofy to believe the &#8220;stated intent&#8221; of a trading rival.  Only a goofer really tells you what they are planning to do&#8230;I guess when you were small you fell for that &#8220;heh your shoe is untied&#8221; bit quite a lot.</p>
<p>Only in your (and Wiser&#8217;s and a few other goofy minds) is a statement that there is no need for human exploration of space a blanket disdain for human spaceflight&#8230;you probably believed that there was WMD in IRAQ.  RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:45:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA....sorry &quot;friends&quot; should be &quot;trends&quot;  the editor regrets the error RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA&#8230;.sorry &#8220;friends&#8221; should be &#8220;trends&#8221;  the editor regrets the error RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357989</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357989</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Coastal Ron wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 12:26 am 
&quot;It may not be quick, but SpaceX is slowly building up political supporters.&quot;

In other words, gonig no place fast. Tick-tock, tick-tock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Coastal Ron wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 12:26 am<br />
&#8220;It may not be quick, but SpaceX is slowly building up political supporters.&#8221;</p>
<p>In other words, gonig no place fast. Tick-tock, tick-tock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 02:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 2:03 pm 

We&#039;ve established your disdain for HSF using your own words on this forum; your denial of stated intent from the PRC on their mid-to-long-term plans for HSF degrades your credibility as well. But keep pitchin&#039; those press release for Musk like a good little Musketeer. BTW- tick-tock, tick-tock.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert G. Oler wrote @ November 21st, 2011 at 2:03 pm </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve established your disdain for HSF using your own words on this forum; your denial of stated intent from the PRC on their mid-to-long-term plans for HSF degrades your credibility as well. But keep pitchin&#8217; those press release for Musk like a good little Musketeer. BTW- tick-tock, tick-tock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 19:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA wrote @ November 20th, 2011 at 5:42 pm 

When you can point out how I have misinterpreted friends all you are, to quote the Testament is a tinkling cymble.  RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA wrote @ November 20th, 2011 at 5:42 pm </p>
<p>When you can point out how I have misinterpreted friends all you are, to quote the Testament is a tinkling cymble.  RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357957</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 05:26:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vulture4 wrote @ November 20th, 2011 at 9:30 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;It is particularly frustrating that Senator Hutchinson seems determined to stall Commercial Crew...&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Yes, that is frustrating, especially since it&#039;s hard to know why.

However SpaceX gave Senator John Cornyn, the other Republican Senator from Texas, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.parabolicarc.com/2011/11/19/video-spacex-wows-townspeople-with-test-firing-of-merlin-engine/&quot; title=&quot;a personal tour of their facility Saturday&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;a personal tour of their facility Saturday&lt;/a&gt; when they held a picnic for McGregor area residents.  The picnic included an engine firing too.

It may not be quick, but SpaceX is slowly building up political supporters.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vulture4 wrote @ November 20th, 2011 at 9:30 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>It is particularly frustrating that Senator Hutchinson seems determined to stall Commercial Crew&#8230;</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, that is frustrating, especially since it&#8217;s hard to know why.</p>
<p>However SpaceX gave Senator John Cornyn, the other Republican Senator from Texas, <a href="http://www.parabolicarc.com/2011/11/19/video-spacex-wows-townspeople-with-test-firing-of-merlin-engine/" title="a personal tour of their facility Saturday" rel="nofollow">a personal tour of their facility Saturday</a> when they held a picnic for McGregor area residents.  The picnic included an engine firing too.</p>
<p>It may not be quick, but SpaceX is slowly building up political supporters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2011/11/17/a-status-report-on-nasas-human-spaceflight-plans/#comment-357952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 02:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5182#comment-357952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate has cut the administration&#039;s $850 million request for commercial crew and related commercial space to less than 50% of the requested amount. This is a disaster; it will delay US manned launch by at least two years and cost more than $400 million in Soyuz rides. 

It is particularly frustrating that Senator Hutchinson seems determined to stall Commercial Crew until Constellation, fueled by more than $3 billion a year, can catch up. This is disgraceful. It would be more patriotic to cut the NASA budget than to spend it on a program that is certain to be cancelled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Senate has cut the administration&#8217;s $850 million request for commercial crew and related commercial space to less than 50% of the requested amount. This is a disaster; it will delay US manned launch by at least two years and cost more than $400 million in Soyuz rides. </p>
<p>It is particularly frustrating that Senator Hutchinson seems determined to stall Commercial Crew until Constellation, fueled by more than $3 billion a year, can catch up. This is disgraceful. It would be more patriotic to cut the NASA budget than to spend it on a program that is certain to be cancelled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
