<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Proposed imagery cuts may trigger industry consolidation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 May 2012 01:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[pathfinder_01 wrote @ May 8th, 2012 at 5:59 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Anyway ULA right now ULA is doing some interesting work towards cost savings. I think they are just milking the situation as long as possible.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Yep.  Milking the taxpayers.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;They are working towards replacing the venerable RL-10 and they could in theory drop the delta line.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

They would have to bring Atlas V Heavy online before doing that, if they want to keep the DoD/NRO business.  That would be a pretty expensive undertaking, and the Air Force would likely not be inclined to help pay for that.  I&#039;m not so sure about that.

Regarding the RL-10, I think that replacement would help, but not significantly.  But I hope XCOR succeeds, since that will provide a standard LH2/LO2 engine for everyone else, with ULA to thank for the development.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>pathfinder_01 wrote @ May 8th, 2012 at 5:59 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Anyway ULA right now ULA is doing some interesting work towards cost savings. I think they are just milking the situation as long as possible.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep.  Milking the taxpayers.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>They are working towards replacing the venerable RL-10 and they could in theory drop the delta line.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>They would have to bring Atlas V Heavy online before doing that, if they want to keep the DoD/NRO business.  That would be a pretty expensive undertaking, and the Air Force would likely not be inclined to help pay for that.  I&#8217;m not so sure about that.</p>
<p>Regarding the RL-10, I think that replacement would help, but not significantly.  But I hope XCOR succeeds, since that will provide a standard LH2/LO2 engine for everyone else, with ULA to thank for the development.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pathfinder_01</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368444</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pathfinder_01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyway ULA right now ULA is doing some interesting work towards cost savings. I think they are just milking the situation as long as possible.  They are working towards replacing the venerable RL-10 and they could in theory drop the delta line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway ULA right now ULA is doing some interesting work towards cost savings. I think they are just milking the situation as long as possible.  They are working towards replacing the venerable RL-10 and they could in theory drop the delta line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pathfinder_01</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368443</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pathfinder_01]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368443</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;So far all of their price adjustments have been to dramatically INCREASE prices, not decrease them.&quot;

At the moment Space X isn&#039;t much of a competitor.  Falcon 9 lifts a little less than Atlas. FH is the only thing that threatens ULA at the moment and FH wonâ€™t be ready till about 2013 or 2014.  DOD certification would come later. Basically they donâ€™t have to worry  about lowering prices until maybe 2016 or so. That is how long it will take for FH to prove itself a reliable launcher. Falcon 9 is replaces the Delta II, which is a rocket they are(or have) phased out. 
 
ULA has completion on the small end for itâ€™s Athena rockets with both Space X and Orbital, but their meat and butter rockets Atlas and Delta heavy, nope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;So far all of their price adjustments have been to dramatically INCREASE prices, not decrease them.&#8221;</p>
<p>At the moment Space X isn&#8217;t much of a competitor.  Falcon 9 lifts a little less than Atlas. FH is the only thing that threatens ULA at the moment and FH wonâ€™t be ready till about 2013 or 2014.  DOD certification would come later. Basically they donâ€™t have to worry  about lowering prices until maybe 2016 or so. That is how long it will take for FH to prove itself a reliable launcher. Falcon 9 is replaces the Delta II, which is a rocket they are(or have) phased out. </p>
<p>ULA has completion on the small end for itâ€™s Athena rockets with both Space X and Orbital, but their meat and butter rockets Atlas and Delta heavy, nope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368442</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 21:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Coastal Ron
&lt;i&gt;&quot;So far all of their price adjustments have been to dramatically INCREASE prices, not decrease them.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
Yes, I know that.  But at some point they may feel forced to do something different out of necessity.  The question is will they do it in time to save themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Coastal Ron<br />
<i>&#8220;So far all of their price adjustments have been to dramatically INCREASE prices, not decrease them.&#8221;</i><br />
Yes, I know that.  But at some point they may feel forced to do something different out of necessity.  The question is will they do it in time to save themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 19:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rick Boozer wrote @ May 8th, 2012 at 1:18 pm

&quot;&lt;i&gt;More likely what we will see is ULA adjusting to compete with SpaceX.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

So far all of their price adjustments have been to dramatically INCREASE prices, not decrease them.

It appears that their strategy is to 1) hope that no other companies become certified to compete with them, and 2) to maximize their profits while they still hold a monopoly.  That&#039;s fine as like as #1 doesn&#039;t change, but if it does, they are setting themselves up for a big fall.

Sad.  Real sad.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick Boozer wrote @ May 8th, 2012 at 1:18 pm</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>More likely what we will see is ULA adjusting to compete with SpaceX.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>So far all of their price adjustments have been to dramatically INCREASE prices, not decrease them.</p>
<p>It appears that their strategy is to 1) hope that no other companies become certified to compete with them, and 2) to maximize their profits while they still hold a monopoly.  That&#8217;s fine as like as #1 doesn&#8217;t change, but if it does, they are setting themselves up for a big fall.</p>
<p>Sad.  Real sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladislaw</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368418</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368418</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;I&gt;&quot;Around 1400 there were no Europeans anywhere outside Europe.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

I think you may be combining two aspects. Marco Polo and Vikings were exploring outside Europe. There was also trade going on in limited terms. A roman ship was discovered off the coast of Brazil and a roman coin was found in a native american burial site that was dated at about 1600 years ago. 

I believe humans across the planet have always explored past boundries that our generation have erected and said they never went past them.

When you talk about the flood of people following the explorers and traders you are more talking about migrations. It looks like when mass migrations voluntarally take place ( not moved by disaster or war)  they expect something at the end of the rainbow. Historicially this has mean&#039;t free land and the resources on that land.

Personally I do not see migrations to space until property rights are established and people can claim the land on the moon with ice, PMG, etc. for free or relatively free.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Around 1400 there were no Europeans anywhere outside Europe.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>I think you may be combining two aspects. Marco Polo and Vikings were exploring outside Europe. There was also trade going on in limited terms. A roman ship was discovered off the coast of Brazil and a roman coin was found in a native american burial site that was dated at about 1600 years ago. </p>
<p>I believe humans across the planet have always explored past boundries that our generation have erected and said they never went past them.</p>
<p>When you talk about the flood of people following the explorers and traders you are more talking about migrations. It looks like when mass migrations voluntarally take place ( not moved by disaster or war)  they expect something at the end of the rainbow. Historicially this has mean&#8217;t free land and the resources on that land.</p>
<p>Personally I do not see migrations to space until property rights are established and people can claim the land on the moon with ice, PMG, etc. for free or relatively free.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 17:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@byeman
&lt;i&gt;&quot;Totally unsubstantiated and nothing but nuspace fanboi spewing.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;
As much as I admire SpaceX and I anticipate great success for them, I have to agree with you on this one.  More likely what we will see is ULA adjusting to compete with SpaceX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@byeman<br />
<i>&#8220;Totally unsubstantiated and nothing but nuspace fanboi spewing.&#8221;</i><br />
As much as I admire SpaceX and I anticipate great success for them, I have to agree with you on this one.  More likely what we will see is ULA adjusting to compete with SpaceX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRC</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BRC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 16:36:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA wrote @ May 8th, 2012 at 6:10 am 
&quot; Cameronâ€™s got an interest and his egocentism is legendary ... And w/projects heâ€™s taken an interest in, all things eventually involve and revolve around him.&quot;

You&#039;re pretty right about the guy.  But you gotta admit, when he puts his money in it, some really nice products roll out for others to eventually use.  Case in point his $$ (and his person, of course), went into that DeepSea Challenger.  So who cares, if in these early dives, we wound up also seeing every pore on his face &amp; pondered the frightful depths of his nostrils, during the resulting NatGeo documentary?  

As a result, we now have technology that can go 7+ miles down, and eventually marine scientists &amp; engineers will fix those operating bugs, expand its envelop for new missions get down to some for-real exploration, including discovering new resources (for exPLOITation).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA wrote @ May 8th, 2012 at 6:10 am<br />
&#8221; Cameronâ€™s got an interest and his egocentism is legendary &#8230; And w/projects heâ€™s taken an interest in, all things eventually involve and revolve around him.&#8221;</p>
<p>You&#8217;re pretty right about the guy.  But you gotta admit, when he puts his money in it, some really nice products roll out for others to eventually use.  Case in point his $$ (and his person, of course), went into that DeepSea Challenger.  So who cares, if in these early dives, we wound up also seeing every pore on his face &amp; pondered the frightful depths of his nostrils, during the resulting NatGeo documentary?  </p>
<p>As a result, we now have technology that can go 7+ miles down, and eventually marine scientists &amp; engineers will fix those operating bugs, expand its envelop for new missions get down to some for-real exploration, including discovering new resources (for exPLOITation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: byeman</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[byeman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 14:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;. Given a bit of time and continued success with both F9 and FH, SpaceX will eliminate ULA from the business.&quot;

Totally unsubstantiated and nothing but nuspace fanboi spewing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. Given a bit of time and continued success with both F9 and FH, SpaceX will eliminate ULA from the business.&#8221;</p>
<p>Totally unsubstantiated and nothing but nuspace fanboi spewing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/05/06/proposed-imagery-cuts-may-trigger-industry-consolidation/#comment-368386</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 May 2012 10:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5594#comment-368386</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Robert G. Oler wrote @ May 7th, 2012 at 3:42 pm 

Cameron&#039;s got an interest and his egocentism is legendary in media circles with a tendancy to drive aawy partners. Je likes to be &#039;king of  the world&#039; -- or at least his worlds. And w/projects he&#039;s taken an interest in, all things eventually involve and revolve around him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert G. Oler wrote @ May 7th, 2012 at 3:42 pm </p>
<p>Cameron&#8217;s got an interest and his egocentism is legendary in media circles with a tendancy to drive aawy partners. Je likes to be &#8216;king of  the world&#8217; &#8212; or at least his worlds. And w/projects he&#8217;s taken an interest in, all things eventually involve and revolve around him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
