<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congressman seeks to set the record straight on COTS&#8217;s origins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371460</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 13:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371460</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The engineering effort began in the late 1980&#039;s.

Musk came in about 2002-2003.

If not for my stroke, I could give you some firmer dates, but that is as best as I can remember it now.

In my usual manner, I will make that statement without citing sources.

Once again, Musk was going to do what he intended to do, and the rest of it is the perception of others of that effort.

I don&#039;t think that a level playing field and no obstacles is too much to ask for.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The engineering effort began in the late 1980&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Musk came in about 2002-2003.</p>
<p>If not for my stroke, I could give you some firmer dates, but that is as best as I can remember it now.</p>
<p>In my usual manner, I will make that statement without citing sources.</p>
<p>Once again, Musk was going to do what he intended to do, and the rest of it is the perception of others of that effort.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that a level playing field and no obstacles is too much to ask for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Teek</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371434</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Teek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2012 03:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m just pleased that space policy archeology has finally found a home...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m just pleased that space policy archeology has finally found a home&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371092</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 20:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371092</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Robert G. Oler wrote @ June 7th, 2012 at 11:53 am
 
&quot;The right wing in this country has been on the attack in a personal fashion since the Clinton yearsâ€¦&quot;

:... the Clinton years...&quot;  Goofy. A lot longer. Apparently you missed the Birchers accusing Ike of being a commie. Best you head to that public library to learn some history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Robert G. Oler wrote @ June 7th, 2012 at 11:53 am</p>
<p>&#8220;The right wing in this country has been on the attack in a personal fashion since the Clinton yearsâ€¦&#8221;</p>
<p>:&#8230; the Clinton years&#8230;&#8221;  Goofy. A lot longer. Apparently you missed the Birchers accusing Ike of being a commie. Best you head to that public library to learn some history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371088</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 18:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://history.nasa.gov/Bush%20SEP.htm   
Read the speech. Bush said NOTHING about commercial cargo or commercial crew: He only said the CEV would provide access to the ISS after Shuttle is terminated. Program Manager Wayne Hale (hardly a closet Socialist) said in 2008 that Shuttle could not be restarted. 
But the GOP blames Obama for the end of Shuttle and will not accept any of the responsibility for themselves. Now they want credit for Commercial Crew even as they are blocking the administration funding request, and of course trying to force out SpaceX, which they see as not Republican enough, through a rigged &quot;downselect&quot;. 

Posey is proud he has only two years of college, and the local voters are happy to have a representative who makes life so simple.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://history.nasa.gov/Bush%20SEP.htm" rel="nofollow">http://history.nasa.gov/Bush%20SEP.htm</a><br />
Read the speech. Bush said NOTHING about commercial cargo or commercial crew: He only said the CEV would provide access to the ISS after Shuttle is terminated. Program Manager Wayne Hale (hardly a closet Socialist) said in 2008 that Shuttle could not be restarted.<br />
But the GOP blames Obama for the end of Shuttle and will not accept any of the responsibility for themselves. Now they want credit for Commercial Crew even as they are blocking the administration funding request, and of course trying to force out SpaceX, which they see as not Republican enough, through a rigged &#8220;downselect&#8221;. </p>
<p>Posey is proud he has only two years of college, and the local voters are happy to have a representative who makes life so simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371085</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Acquire crew transportation to and from the International Space Station, as required, after the Space Shuttle is retired from service.&quot;

From where? Here is Bush&#039;s speech:

&quot;The Crew Exploration Vehicle will be capable of ferrying astronauts and scientists to the Space Station after the shuttle is retired.&quot;

There is not one word about commercial space in Bush&#039;s speech, cargo or crew. The Bush administration approved the initial commercial cargo demonstration as a stopgap until the ISS was dropped (by the US) in 2015. All the funding for actual commercial cargo ops and all the actual proposals, planning and funding for commercial crew were initiated by President Obama. The only reason I&#039;m making this point is that the GOP is still fighting tooth and nail against commercial crew. Like Posey who says he deserves the credit for commercial crew for sponsoring a meaningless bill that provides no funding at all, and then says &quot;there isn&#039;t enough money&quot; to fund the administration request, while putting the difference into another meaningless Constellation test flight and years of buying seats on Soyuz. In a local rally I heard him attack the president with language I can only call vicious. If you&#039;re not on the team, you don&#039;t get the credit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Acquire crew transportation to and from the International Space Station, as required, after the Space Shuttle is retired from service.&#8221;</p>
<p>From where? Here is Bush&#8217;s speech:</p>
<p>&#8220;The Crew Exploration Vehicle will be capable of ferrying astronauts and scientists to the Space Station after the shuttle is retired.&#8221;</p>
<p>There is not one word about commercial space in Bush&#8217;s speech, cargo or crew. The Bush administration approved the initial commercial cargo demonstration as a stopgap until the ISS was dropped (by the US) in 2015. All the funding for actual commercial cargo ops and all the actual proposals, planning and funding for commercial crew were initiated by President Obama. The only reason I&#8217;m making this point is that the GOP is still fighting tooth and nail against commercial crew. Like Posey who says he deserves the credit for commercial crew for sponsoring a meaningless bill that provides no funding at all, and then says &#8220;there isn&#8217;t enough money&#8221; to fund the administration request, while putting the difference into another meaningless Constellation test flight and years of buying seats on Soyuz. In a local rally I heard him attack the president with language I can only call vicious. If you&#8217;re not on the team, you don&#8217;t get the credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wodun</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371066</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wodun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2012 00:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371066</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stop being goofy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stop being goofy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 15:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wodun wrote @ June 7th, 2012 at 9:12 pm

Both the current and past administrations deserve credit for the success of COTS, &gt;&gt;

it is not like Taft and TR taking credit for the Canal...

the problem I have with your comments is that if the Dragon had failed to any degree then the person who would have been the loudest in a total critique of the entire program.....

would have been Griffin.  

He just would not have said &quot;well new effort restart etc&quot;, in my view he would have done what he has been doing since leaving The Papacy...he would have mocked the entire effort; his &quot;bag of underwear&quot; speech.

Hard to give credit to someone who does that.

&quot;Do the people here who can remember the minutia from Apollo launches really have such a flawed memory when it comes to more recent history? &quot;

No, its just the people who are making up both.

A modest note.  &quot;Victory&quot; in politics is more or less &quot;achieving defined goals&quot;.  and politicians run away from things when those goals become difficult to achieve.  This is why Bush went from Ossama &quot;dead or alive&quot; to &quot;I really dont care about him&quot; (or something like that)...

It is why Griffin has been amazingly quiet about Dragon and Scott Pace is making &quot;Pace statements&quot; (ie ones bordering on special needs class).  

If you define Victory in Iraq as removing Saddam wow!!! get the aircraft carrier out and put a banner on it labeled Mission Accomplish.  The rest...not so much RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wodun wrote @ June 7th, 2012 at 9:12 pm</p>
<p>Both the current and past administrations deserve credit for the success of COTS, &gt;&gt;</p>
<p>it is not like Taft and TR taking credit for the Canal&#8230;</p>
<p>the problem I have with your comments is that if the Dragon had failed to any degree then the person who would have been the loudest in a total critique of the entire program&#8230;..</p>
<p>would have been Griffin.  </p>
<p>He just would not have said &#8220;well new effort restart etc&#8221;, in my view he would have done what he has been doing since leaving The Papacy&#8230;he would have mocked the entire effort; his &#8220;bag of underwear&#8221; speech.</p>
<p>Hard to give credit to someone who does that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Do the people here who can remember the minutia from Apollo launches really have such a flawed memory when it comes to more recent history? &#8221;</p>
<p>No, its just the people who are making up both.</p>
<p>A modest note.  &#8220;Victory&#8221; in politics is more or less &#8220;achieving defined goals&#8221;.  and politicians run away from things when those goals become difficult to achieve.  This is why Bush went from Ossama &#8220;dead or alive&#8221; to &#8220;I really dont care about him&#8221; (or something like that)&#8230;</p>
<p>It is why Griffin has been amazingly quiet about Dragon and Scott Pace is making &#8220;Pace statements&#8221; (ie ones bordering on special needs class).  </p>
<p>If you define Victory in Iraq as removing Saddam wow!!! get the aircraft carrier out and put a banner on it labeled Mission Accomplish.  The rest&#8230;not so much RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladislaw</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-371015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladislaw]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:43:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-371015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vulture4 wrote:

&lt;I&gt;I never knew who was actually responsible or how such an incredibly biased and obviously inaccurate report could be produced.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

It would seem criminal. The way they by passed EELV&#039;s. If NASA would have built a simplier version of a cargo/crew capsule that could launch on the Atlas these arguements would have never even taken place. They could have EASILY beat the 2014 deadline. Considering they had a such a huge difference in funding compared to the commercials.

Lockmart has been spening a BILLION a year for a freakin&#039; capsule? How many years in total? 2005/6 - 2017?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vulture4 wrote:</p>
<p><i>I never knew who was actually responsible or how such an incredibly biased and obviously inaccurate report could be produced.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>It would seem criminal. The way they by passed EELV&#8217;s. If NASA would have built a simplier version of a cargo/crew capsule that could launch on the Atlas these arguements would have never even taken place. They could have EASILY beat the 2014 deadline. Considering they had a such a huge difference in funding compared to the commercials.</p>
<p>Lockmart has been spening a BILLION a year for a freakin&#8217; capsule? How many years in total? 2005/6 &#8211; 2017?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rand Simberg</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-370992</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rand Simberg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 05:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-370992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;Worse for me was the shoddiness of the â€œtrialâ€. There is not a single scintilla of words spoken under oath. The GOP Senate never not once called a single witness. Wonder why that was?&lt;/em&gt;

Because they were political cowards, afraid of losing another election.  And you idiotically continue to pull the discussion off the topic of space politics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Worse for me was the shoddiness of the â€œtrialâ€. There is not a single scintilla of words spoken under oath. The GOP Senate never not once called a single witness. Wonder why that was?</em></p>
<p>Because they were political cowards, afraid of losing another election.  And you idiotically continue to pull the discussion off the topic of space politics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wodun</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/06/06/congressman-seeks-to-set-the-record-straight-on-cotss-origins/#comment-370988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[wodun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jun 2012 01:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=5674#comment-370988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both the current and past administrations deserve credit for the success of COTS, it is not &quot;goofy&quot; in the least.

Who are these people who still claim Bush lied us into Iraq? Do the people here who can remember the minutia from Apollo launches really have such a flawed memory when it comes to more recent history? Didn&#039;t take more than 5 comments before this tread went OT.

Guess what, the war in Iraq is over and we won. Both administrations deserve credit for that too. Both administrations also deserve credit for the efforts that lead to the death of OBL.

Sometimes people with different politics actually do work toward a common goal.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both the current and past administrations deserve credit for the success of COTS, it is not &#8220;goofy&#8221; in the least.</p>
<p>Who are these people who still claim Bush lied us into Iraq? Do the people here who can remember the minutia from Apollo launches really have such a flawed memory when it comes to more recent history? Didn&#8217;t take more than 5 comments before this tread went OT.</p>
<p>Guess what, the war in Iraq is over and we won. Both administrations deserve credit for that too. Both administrations also deserve credit for the efforts that lead to the death of OBL.</p>
<p>Sometimes people with different politics actually do work toward a common goal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
