<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The return of Mars Sample Return?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-return-of-mars-sample-return</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aberwys</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-389513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aberwys]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2012 03:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-389513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Drill,  baby,  drill!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Drill,  baby,  drill!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Willett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388973</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Willett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2012 05:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388973</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t new programs usually get announced as part of the budget process?
But here NASA has suddenly &quot;found&quot; the money for this elsewhere in the budget. Well maybe.
It sounds to me like NASA just wanted to get this mission &quot;on the books&quot; ahead of the comming budget cuts.
Maybe it&#039;s just something to trade to protect other programs. Who knows.
When the real budget comes out post cliff we&#039;ll see. I won&#039;t believe it&#039;s a real program till then.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t new programs usually get announced as part of the budget process?<br />
But here NASA has suddenly &#8220;found&#8221; the money for this elsewhere in the budget. Well maybe.<br />
It sounds to me like NASA just wanted to get this mission &#8220;on the books&#8221; ahead of the comming budget cuts.<br />
Maybe it&#8217;s just something to trade to protect other programs. Who knows.<br />
When the real budget comes out post cliff we&#8217;ll see. I won&#8217;t believe it&#8217;s a real program till then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roving up (or down) Valles Marineris with HD camera. Call the mission &quot;Powell&quot;.

A light ball rover might be useful for this, I don&#039;t know how the development is going. Low launch cost as well, providing communication link in orbit exists.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roving up (or down) Valles Marineris with HD camera. Call the mission &#8220;Powell&#8221;.</p>
<p>A light ball rover might be useful for this, I don&#8217;t know how the development is going. Low launch cost as well, providing communication link in orbit exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388795</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A chunk of concrete acting as a satellite would not surprise me.  They exhibited something that looked like one of the Hamsats by Surrey...Wingo had some interesting (and probably accurate) comments on it.

But the US launches &quot;mass simulators&quot; a lot and it wouldnt surprise me if they did the same thing.  When you control the news to your people then everytime it comes over the beloved homeland it can sing the praises of Dear or Benevolent Leader (which is the new guy?)

The satellite that they paraded around seemed &quot;ambitious&quot; to me.  

and the folks in South Korea are so paranoid that they would probably believe that the North has just launched the equivalent of a KH 11..as their Russian more or less built launcher is stalled.

Still listening but so far nothing.  I routinely pick up one of the old Explorers that sometimes come on with this...and they are very weak so I should hear it.  Had a darn near overhead pass nothing where I am listening.

No matter what they put on the rocket, the rocket is an impressive achievement.  North Korea is a horrible state but some people there worked pretty hard to make it happen and I bet they didnt get much for it, maybe an extra slice of bread...

Robert G. Oler WB5MZO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A chunk of concrete acting as a satellite would not surprise me.  They exhibited something that looked like one of the Hamsats by Surrey&#8230;Wingo had some interesting (and probably accurate) comments on it.</p>
<p>But the US launches &#8220;mass simulators&#8221; a lot and it wouldnt surprise me if they did the same thing.  When you control the news to your people then everytime it comes over the beloved homeland it can sing the praises of Dear or Benevolent Leader (which is the new guy?)</p>
<p>The satellite that they paraded around seemed &#8220;ambitious&#8221; to me.  </p>
<p>and the folks in South Korea are so paranoid that they would probably believe that the North has just launched the equivalent of a KH 11..as their Russian more or less built launcher is stalled.</p>
<p>Still listening but so far nothing.  I routinely pick up one of the old Explorers that sometimes come on with this&#8230;and they are very weak so I should hear it.  Had a darn near overhead pass nothing where I am listening.</p>
<p>No matter what they put on the rocket, the rocket is an impressive achievement.  North Korea is a horrible state but some people there worked pretty hard to make it happen and I bet they didnt get much for it, maybe an extra slice of bread&#8230;</p>
<p>Robert G. Oler WB5MZO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Russell-Gough</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Russell-Gough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 11:26:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m betting that it was an inert shell - They couldn&#039;t put a satellite together (either lack of resources or lack of skills), so they launched an inert shell and are going to claim that it broke down after a few orbits due to either thermal effects or unspecified &quot;foreign interference&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m betting that it was an inert shell &#8211; They couldn&#8217;t put a satellite together (either lack of resources or lack of skills), so they launched an inert shell and are going to claim that it broke down after a few orbits due to either thermal effects or unspecified &#8220;foreign interference&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Shipley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388709</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Shipley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 07:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, been to Mars, done that sampling stuff.  Let&#039;s see a mission to Europa, interesting active moon, or alternatively, a manned Mars mission.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, been to Mars, done that sampling stuff.  Let&#8217;s see a mission to Europa, interesting active moon, or alternatively, a manned Mars mission.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jim Nobles.  I did a little keyboarding on this..particularly after I looked at the Falcon heavy mission profile for the USAF...

My notions would require some modification to at least 1 Falcon second stage (the one on the heavy) but these are things that they might find useful anyway.

In my theory the Falcon 9 1.1 would launch with the &quot;stack&quot; of Mars probes in a modest satellite carrier that on one end had some form of docking system...the Heavy would launch and put a second stage into orbit almost full with little payload except (and one would have to keep the masses from adding up to quickly here)

1.  a modest to large solar array on the &quot;trunk&quot;, some deep space com systems maybe even some SES propulsion and 
2.  a rendezvous docking system.

It docks with the Falcon 9 &quot;mass&quot; and the probes which are launched more or less &quot;sleeping&quot; then start getting keep alive stuff from the Heavy second stage (HSS).

the heavy second stage burns into solar transfer orbit, unfurls its large arrays/antennas etc and transits to Mars perhaps using SES devices to &quot;push along&quot;

The vehicle would be on an impact course until it released the &quot;lander(s)&quot; then it would change into an orbit profile and go into orbit

it could then release whatever it needed to or hold onto whatever needed to be held onto, and that might include an earth return stage...in the meantime it acts as a real comm platform

The masses add up quickly here but it might be doable

RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim Nobles.  I did a little keyboarding on this..particularly after I looked at the Falcon heavy mission profile for the USAF&#8230;</p>
<p>My notions would require some modification to at least 1 Falcon second stage (the one on the heavy) but these are things that they might find useful anyway.</p>
<p>In my theory the Falcon 9 1.1 would launch with the &#8220;stack&#8221; of Mars probes in a modest satellite carrier that on one end had some form of docking system&#8230;the Heavy would launch and put a second stage into orbit almost full with little payload except (and one would have to keep the masses from adding up to quickly here)</p>
<p>1.  a modest to large solar array on the &#8220;trunk&#8221;, some deep space com systems maybe even some SES propulsion and<br />
2.  a rendezvous docking system.</p>
<p>It docks with the Falcon 9 &#8220;mass&#8221; and the probes which are launched more or less &#8220;sleeping&#8221; then start getting keep alive stuff from the Heavy second stage (HSS).</p>
<p>the heavy second stage burns into solar transfer orbit, unfurls its large arrays/antennas etc and transits to Mars perhaps using SES devices to &#8220;push along&#8221;</p>
<p>The vehicle would be on an impact course until it released the &#8220;lander(s)&#8221; then it would change into an orbit profile and go into orbit</p>
<p>it could then release whatever it needed to or hold onto whatever needed to be held onto, and that might include an earth return stage&#8230;in the meantime it acts as a real comm platform</p>
<p>The masses add up quickly here but it might be doable</p>
<p>RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bennett In Vermont</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388670</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bennett In Vermont]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2012 04:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would much rather see a rover mission (or anything) to Europa.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would much rather see a rover mission (or anything) to Europa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:34:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#039;s see... North Korea has the satellite, South Korea has Hundai and Samsung. But hey, we need a moon race with China to prove we lead the world.

Regarding Mars sample return, given the improvements in in situ instruments, I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s the best use of our dollars. Mars is a huge planet, with a land area the same as earth&#039;s land area. Sample return can bring back only a tiny fraction of what faster, more autonomous rovers could examine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; North Korea has the satellite, South Korea has Hundai and Samsung. But hey, we need a moon race with China to prove we lead the world.</p>
<p>Regarding Mars sample return, given the improvements in in situ instruments, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s the best use of our dollars. Mars is a huge planet, with a land area the same as earth&#8217;s land area. Sample return can bring back only a tiny fraction of what faster, more autonomous rovers could examine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/12/the-return-of-mars-sample-return/#comment-388630</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Dec 2012 23:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6078#comment-388630</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When the thing came over Santa Fe it was quiet on all the frequencies that I was listening on from 136 to 500 mhz...nothing .  I dont have X band up so if it was doing something there I am out of luck.  Should have looked on HF but would have to do it manually the PC controlled rig isnt up and going.

They probably tried &quot;to much&quot; Of a satellite...It looked like they were doing some gravity gradient stuff and that takes a little finise in terms of deployment  RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When the thing came over Santa Fe it was quiet on all the frequencies that I was listening on from 136 to 500 mhz&#8230;nothing .  I dont have X band up so if it was doing something there I am out of luck.  Should have looked on HF but would have to do it manually the PC controlled rig isnt up and going.</p>
<p>They probably tried &#8220;to much&#8221; Of a satellite&#8230;It looked like they were doing some gravity gradient stuff and that takes a little finise in terms of deployment  RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
