<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Space policy stocking stuffers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=space-policy-stocking-stuffers</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391991</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA moaned:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Space X has flown nobody.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

As you&#039;ve been schooled about previously, they haven&#039;t tried, so it&#039;s pretty nonsensical to say that.

However today, at a NASA briefing for the Commercial Crew program, SpaceX said they are targeting their first test flights with crew in 2015.

What a crow eating-fest for you that will be...  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA moaned:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Space X has flown nobody.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>As you&#8217;ve been schooled about previously, they haven&#8217;t tried, so it&#8217;s pretty nonsensical to say that.</p>
<p>However today, at a NASA briefing for the Commercial Crew program, SpaceX said they are targeting their first test flights with crew in 2015.</p>
<p>What a crow eating-fest for you that will be&#8230;  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 12:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Keep telling yourself that Chris.  While you keep lying to us and yourself that none of the CC partipants has an incentive for going beyond LEO, when the whole purpose SpaceX was created is to get to Mars.

If you hadn&#039;t been told the truth before and you said that statement, you would not be lying.  I have given you the benefit of the doubt before now and not blatantly come out and said you were lying. But there is no way anyone can say you haven&#039;t been told the truth at this point.  So I am going to call you on this lie everytime you say it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keep telling yourself that Chris.  While you keep lying to us and yourself that none of the CC partipants has an incentive for going beyond LEO, when the whole purpose SpaceX was created is to get to Mars.</p>
<p>If you hadn&#8217;t been told the truth before and you said that statement, you would not be lying.  I have given you the benefit of the doubt before now and not blatantly come out and said you were lying. But there is no way anyone can say you haven&#8217;t been told the truth at this point.  So I am going to call you on this lie everytime you say it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391855</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:02:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[THAT was to DCSCA&#039;s comment, by the way.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THAT was to DCSCA&#8217;s comment, by the way&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391854</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Aces on that statement!!! They---Commercial Crew---are just going in circles, &amp; nowhere fast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aces on that statement!!! They&#8212;Commercial Crew&#8212;are just going in circles, &amp; nowhere fast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Boozer</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick Boozer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:57:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ron, I suppose you know that when I said Commericial Crew is the new Gemini, I was speaking only from the standpoint of what the hardware could do in space.  Gemini was LEO, Commercial Crew is also LEO. But as you say, the &lt;b&gt;difference&lt;/b&gt; is affordability.  Going beyond LEO is the next step after Commercial Crew and that is the &lt;b&gt;whole reason&lt;/b&gt; for SpaceX&#039;s existence.  Chris just plain won&#039;t allow himself to wrap his mind around that concept.

I had this &lt;b&gt;very faint&lt;/b&gt; hope that I might be able to get Chris to go beyond his ingrained prejudice long enough to see that his idea that we are going to be restricted to LEO is false.  I was just trying to give him one last benefit of the doubt.

Even after we go beyond LEO again, he will say that it could have been done practically and sooner some other way.  That will be the case even when we return to the Moon (which we will, with or without NASA). &lt;b&gt;In working towards the capability to go to Mars, we will &lt;i&gt;automatically&lt;/i&gt; (long before we go to Mars) be able to return to the Moon because the capabilities required for a lunar return are a small subset of what is needed to go to Mars.&lt;/b&gt;

Chris seems to think Elon is bullshitting when he says his primary goal is Mars.  He is a truly hopeless fanatic.  I totally give up on trying to reason with him.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ron, I suppose you know that when I said Commericial Crew is the new Gemini, I was speaking only from the standpoint of what the hardware could do in space.  Gemini was LEO, Commercial Crew is also LEO. But as you say, the <b>difference</b> is affordability.  Going beyond LEO is the next step after Commercial Crew and that is the <b>whole reason</b> for SpaceX&#8217;s existence.  Chris just plain won&#8217;t allow himself to wrap his mind around that concept.</p>
<p>I had this <b>very faint</b> hope that I might be able to get Chris to go beyond his ingrained prejudice long enough to see that his idea that we are going to be restricted to LEO is false.  I was just trying to give him one last benefit of the doubt.</p>
<p>Even after we go beyond LEO again, he will say that it could have been done practically and sooner some other way.  That will be the case even when we return to the Moon (which we will, with or without NASA). <b>In working towards the capability to go to Mars, we will <i>automatically</i> (long before we go to Mars) be able to return to the Moon because the capabilities required for a lunar return are a small subset of what is needed to go to Mars.</b></p>
<p>Chris seems to think Elon is bullshitting when he says his primary goal is Mars.  He is a truly hopeless fanatic.  I totally give up on trying to reason with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391645</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 15:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Castro moaned:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Commercial Crew is NOT the new Gemini!&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Commercial is not like government?  Reusable is not like expendable?  Operational is not like test?

Wow, what insight.

This may of news to you Chris, but Commercial Crew is going to be like Commercial Crew, which means dramatically lowering the cost to access space.  It is also the permanent transfer of responsibility for what used to take a country to afford and do, and make it the responsibility of companies.

It should have happened a decade ago, but at least it&#039;s finally coming.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Castro moaned:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Commercial Crew is NOT the new Gemini!</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Commercial is not like government?  Reusable is not like expendable?  Operational is not like test?</p>
<p>Wow, what insight.</p>
<p>This may of news to you Chris, but Commercial Crew is going to be like Commercial Crew, which means dramatically lowering the cost to access space.  It is also the permanent transfer of responsibility for what used to take a country to afford and do, and make it the responsibility of companies.</p>
<p>It should have happened a decade ago, but at least it&#8217;s finally coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2013 12:38:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, too bad I can&#039;t understand that. I dread an LEO-only NASA going on for yet another twenty years! Commercial Crew is NOT the new Gemini! It is the new Space Shuttle, and extending the ISS any more decades is a massive engineering waste of talent &amp; ability! The country can do way better than Obamaspace!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, too bad I can&#8217;t understand that. I dread an LEO-only NASA going on for yet another twenty years! Commercial Crew is NOT the new Gemini! It is the new Space Shuttle, and extending the ISS any more decades is a massive engineering waste of talent &amp; ability! The country can do way better than Obamaspace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Castro said:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;If a big space project has come along enough, in terms of progress, usually a new president â€œcannotâ€ terminate it.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Finally, some level of understanding for how things work.

Yes, if the Constellation program would have been on schedule, and on budget, no one would have questioned it.

But it wasn&#039;t Chris.  It was horribly behind schedule, and massively over budget.  That is why a bi-partisan Congress agreed - WITHOUT DEBATE - to cancel it when requested by Obama.  Congress could have ignored Obama, and either Republicans or Democrats in the Senate could have filibustered the legislation to kill the program, but Congress agreed.  Let me repeat - CONGRESS AGREED that the Constellation program needed to be killed.

So let that be a lesson for you.  If you can&#039;t propose a program architecture that will stay on schedule and budget, and if you can&#039;t staff the program with good enough program managers that can solve problems within schedule and budget, then your little lunar dreams will never happen.  NEVER!

That&#039;s why many of us support the goals of the companies trying to lower the costs to access space, because that frees up money that will be needed for the other hardware that will inevitably go over schedule and budget.  So what SpaceX is doing is making it easier for your lunar dreams to come true, as is the work being done on the ISS to solve the problems relating to living and working in space.

Too bad you can&#039;t understand that....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Castro said:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>If a big space project has come along enough, in terms of progress, usually a new president â€œcannotâ€ terminate it.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Finally, some level of understanding for how things work.</p>
<p>Yes, if the Constellation program would have been on schedule, and on budget, no one would have questioned it.</p>
<p>But it wasn&#8217;t Chris.  It was horribly behind schedule, and massively over budget.  That is why a bi-partisan Congress agreed &#8211; WITHOUT DEBATE &#8211; to cancel it when requested by Obama.  Congress could have ignored Obama, and either Republicans or Democrats in the Senate could have filibustered the legislation to kill the program, but Congress agreed.  Let me repeat &#8211; CONGRESS AGREED that the Constellation program needed to be killed.</p>
<p>So let that be a lesson for you.  If you can&#8217;t propose a program architecture that will stay on schedule and budget, and if you can&#8217;t staff the program with good enough program managers that can solve problems within schedule and budget, then your little lunar dreams will never happen.  NEVER!</p>
<p>That&#8217;s why many of us support the goals of the companies trying to lower the costs to access space, because that frees up money that will be needed for the other hardware that will inevitably go over schedule and budget.  So what SpaceX is doing is making it easier for your lunar dreams to come true, as is the work being done on the ISS to solve the problems relating to living and working in space.</p>
<p>Too bad you can&#8217;t understand that&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chris Castro moaned:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Did I mistake you for one of the anti-Moon Mars zealots?&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Chris, you confuse the lack of enthusiasm for spending gobs and gobs of money without any real need for being against going to the Moon or Mars.

I would love to go to the Moon and Mars, but I don&#039;t see the value in spending $100-200B of my taxpayer money just so a couple of &quot;chosen ones&quot; can spend a week or two on the Moon picking up rocks.

If we&#039;re going to go back to the Moon, it should be to stay - to establish a permanent presence, just like we have in LEO.  However we don&#039;t have the knowledge or technology to do that in a sustainable fashion yet, so going back prematurely is just wasting money, something we don&#039;t have any to waste.

So the bigger question is, why do you want to waste money?  Do you have stock in Boeing or Lockheed Martin, or some other company that would benefit from large government contracts?

The Moon has been there for billions of years, and it will keep waiting for us as long as it takes for us to be ready to go back, but we&#039;re not ready now, and there is no urgency to going back.

Take a chill pill...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Castro moaned:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Did I mistake you for one of the anti-Moon Mars zealots?</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Chris, you confuse the lack of enthusiasm for spending gobs and gobs of money without any real need for being against going to the Moon or Mars.</p>
<p>I would love to go to the Moon and Mars, but I don&#8217;t see the value in spending $100-200B of my taxpayer money just so a couple of &#8220;chosen ones&#8221; can spend a week or two on the Moon picking up rocks.</p>
<p>If we&#8217;re going to go back to the Moon, it should be to stay &#8211; to establish a permanent presence, just like we have in LEO.  However we don&#8217;t have the knowledge or technology to do that in a sustainable fashion yet, so going back prematurely is just wasting money, something we don&#8217;t have any to waste.</p>
<p>So the bigger question is, why do you want to waste money?  Do you have stock in Boeing or Lockheed Martin, or some other company that would benefit from large government contracts?</p>
<p>The Moon has been there for billions of years, and it will keep waiting for us as long as it takes for us to be ready to go back, but we&#8217;re not ready now, and there is no urgency to going back.</p>
<p>Take a chill pill&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Castro</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2012/12/24/space-policy-stocking-stuffers/#comment-391454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Castro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jan 2013 13:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6105#comment-391454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, they&#039;d rather have golf-trips on NEO&#039;s or on the ISS! (It&#039;s just that on the ISS, a golf ball could break a window, and on an NEO it&#039;d launch straight into solar orbit.) Yes, Bush certainly failed to firmly make Constellation happen. Had he done so, Mr. Obama would&#039;ve just had to let it be! I mean, did Bush Jr. stop the ISS? Did Jimmy Carter stop the Space Shuttle? If a big space project has come along enough, in terms of progress, usually a new president &quot;cannot&quot; terminate it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, they&#8217;d rather have golf-trips on NEO&#8217;s or on the ISS! (It&#8217;s just that on the ISS, a golf ball could break a window, and on an NEO it&#8217;d launch straight into solar orbit.) Yes, Bush certainly failed to firmly make Constellation happen. Had he done so, Mr. Obama would&#8217;ve just had to let it be! I mean, did Bush Jr. stop the ISS? Did Jimmy Carter stop the Space Shuttle? If a big space project has come along enough, in terms of progress, usually a new president &#8220;cannot&#8221; terminate it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
