<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The next FCC chairman and commercial space</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ÑÐ»Ð¸Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ðµ Ð´ÑƒÑ…Ð¸</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-422659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ÑÐ»Ð¸Ñ‚Ð½Ñ‹Ðµ Ð´ÑƒÑ…Ð¸]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 10:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-422659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent points altogether, you just received a new reader. What might you suggest about your post that you made some days ago? Any positive?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent points altogether, you just received a new reader. What might you suggest about your post that you made some days ago? Any positive?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-421040</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-421040</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hiram said:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;â€œChiefâ€ of anything is the guy who gets to say â€œnoâ€.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

&quot;No&quot; is important, but &quot;Yes&quot; is just as important.  And I&#039;m not sure you appreciate how much effort goes into defining the product in the first place.

For instance, Musk has stated that before they started designing their rockets, that they looked at the failure rates and root causes of all the rockets they could.  That led them down the path of having multiple engines.  Looking at engine technology they decided to go with something simple, which opened up the ability for them to manufacture it in-house.

There are many, many decisions that are made before you get into engineering-only decisions like wall thicknesses and 6061 vs 7075 tradeoffs.  But it starts with business decisions, and as time goes on transitions into pure engineering ones.

&quot;&lt;i&gt;When you own the company, thatâ€™s you.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Musk doesn&#039;t do everything.  He may talk with the people that do a lot, and talk about the high-level goals and how they are helped or impacted.  He is the Chief Designer, not the only one.

Just as Steve Jobs did not do everything at Apple.  In fact, after Jobs death it came out that there were many times his team wanted to go in a direction he didn&#039;t, and he decided to trust them.  You never saw that when he presented though, because he always said &quot;We&quot;, not &quot;I&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hiram said:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>â€œChiefâ€ of anything is the guy who gets to say â€œnoâ€.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;No&#8221; is important, but &#8220;Yes&#8221; is just as important.  And I&#8217;m not sure you appreciate how much effort goes into defining the product in the first place.</p>
<p>For instance, Musk has stated that before they started designing their rockets, that they looked at the failure rates and root causes of all the rockets they could.  That led them down the path of having multiple engines.  Looking at engine technology they decided to go with something simple, which opened up the ability for them to manufacture it in-house.</p>
<p>There are many, many decisions that are made before you get into engineering-only decisions like wall thicknesses and 6061 vs 7075 tradeoffs.  But it starts with business decisions, and as time goes on transitions into pure engineering ones.</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>When you own the company, thatâ€™s you.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Musk doesn&#8217;t do everything.  He may talk with the people that do a lot, and talk about the high-level goals and how they are helped or impacted.  He is the Chief Designer, not the only one.</p>
<p>Just as Steve Jobs did not do everything at Apple.  In fact, after Jobs death it came out that there were many times his team wanted to go in a direction he didn&#8217;t, and he decided to trust them.  You never saw that when he presented though, because he always said &#8220;We&#8221;, not &#8220;I&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiram</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-421033</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hiram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 19:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-421033</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Elon Musk is â€˜chief engineerâ€™ and â€˜chief executive officerâ€™ of his own corporation.&quot;

Works for me, as does &quot;Chief Innovator&quot;. Maybe &quot;Chief Designer&quot;, as he&#039;d like to be called. The very specific question was who was the &quot;vehicle designer&quot; who was a computer nerd. Still waiting ...

&quot;Chief&quot; of anything is the guy who gets to say &quot;no&quot;. When you own the company, that&#039;s you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Elon Musk is â€˜chief engineerâ€™ and â€˜chief executive officerâ€™ of his own corporation.&#8221;</p>
<p>Works for me, as does &#8220;Chief Innovator&#8221;. Maybe &#8220;Chief Designer&#8221;, as he&#8217;d like to be called. The very specific question was who was the &#8220;vehicle designer&#8221; who was a computer nerd. Still waiting &#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Chief&#8221; of anything is the guy who gets to say &#8220;no&#8221;. When you own the company, that&#8217;s you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420969</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 06:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420969</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Fred Willett said:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Spacex May be in the lead but (assuming they can do reusability) others will quickly follow and may even surpass them.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

And that would be good.

The lower the price goes, the more likely it will be that we can expand humanities presence out into space.

Congress still may not want to give NASA more money, and Congress may still be forcing NASA to build and use the SLS, but that&#039;s OK.  Once the price falls far enough, the private sector in America will be able to make their own push out beyond LEO - and we already see the beginnings of it today with efforts like Inspiration Mars, Deep Space Industries, and Planetary Resources.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Willett said:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Spacex May be in the lead but (assuming they can do reusability) others will quickly follow and may even surpass them.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>And that would be good.</p>
<p>The lower the price goes, the more likely it will be that we can expand humanities presence out into space.</p>
<p>Congress still may not want to give NASA more money, and Congress may still be forcing NASA to build and use the SLS, but that&#8217;s OK.  Once the price falls far enough, the private sector in America will be able to make their own push out beyond LEO &#8211; and we already see the beginnings of it today with efforts like Inspiration Mars, Deep Space Industries, and Planetary Resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Willett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420909</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Willett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420909</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Musk tried to hire a vehicle designer, but none were available. So he &quot;read some books&quot; and took on the job himself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Musk tried to hire a vehicle designer, but none were available. So he &#8220;read some books&#8221; and took on the job himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Willett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420908</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Willett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420908</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elon Musk has said that the most likely outcome of starting SpaceX was failure, but he thought it was worth trying anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk has said that the most likely outcome of starting SpaceX was failure, but he thought it was worth trying anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Willett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420907</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Willett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 23:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree. Spacex May be in the lead but (assuming they can do reusability) others will quickly follow and may even surpass them.
After all it was Curtis who quickly surpassed the Wrights.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree. Spacex May be in the lead but (assuming they can do reusability) others will quickly follow and may even surpass them.<br />
After all it was Curtis who quickly surpassed the Wrights.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred Willett</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420906</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fred Willett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 23:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Agree 100%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Guest]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think both of you are completely missing the point, but all of this discussion is of course off topic. Elon Musk is &#039;chief engineer&#039; and &#039;chief executive officer&#039; of his own corporation. A rocket is a pointy cylinder that punches through the atmosphere at a slowly increasing acceleration. There isn&#039;t a whole lot to design except for the propulsion and the engine layout. He is &#039;chief innovator&#039; more than anything, and his innovations have mostly to do with &#039;silly&#039; (read &#039;insane&#039;) things that have traditionally been done at the subsystem level in most conventional launch vehicles - things like explosive detonations where pneumatic cylinders will do, etc. The three by three layout was mostly fortuitous, but he will most likely be remembered for that innovation alone, along with the infamous three by three to octagonal circular transformation that allowed his reusability innovations to be possible, along with the abundant acceleration control and engine out responses to proceed, without stressing out or losing the vehicle. Any good education in engineering mechanics would get you there, but you also have to WANT to make these things happen.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think both of you are completely missing the point, but all of this discussion is of course off topic. Elon Musk is &#8216;chief engineer&#8217; and &#8216;chief executive officer&#8217; of his own corporation. A rocket is a pointy cylinder that punches through the atmosphere at a slowly increasing acceleration. There isn&#8217;t a whole lot to design except for the propulsion and the engine layout. He is &#8216;chief innovator&#8217; more than anything, and his innovations have mostly to do with &#8216;silly&#8217; (read &#8216;insane&#8217;) things that have traditionally been done at the subsystem level in most conventional launch vehicles &#8211; things like explosive detonations where pneumatic cylinders will do, etc. The three by three layout was mostly fortuitous, but he will most likely be remembered for that innovation alone, along with the infamous three by three to octagonal circular transformation that allowed his reusability innovations to be possible, along with the abundant acceleration control and engine out responses to proceed, without stressing out or losing the vehicle. Any good education in engineering mechanics would get you there, but you also have to WANT to make these things happen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiram</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/07/25/the-next-fcc-chairman-and-commercial-space/#comment-420887</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hiram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6514#comment-420887</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Maybe you need to provide a definition of a â€œvehicle designerâ€, because to me that includes taking into account business strategy.&quot;

There we simply disagree. Shrug. If I hire a &quot;vehicle designer&quot;, it&#039;s going to be someone who designs vehicles, not someone who worries about business strategy. The definition is right in the words.

&quot;But that is not what Musk as said. He has stated that he would only IPO if that is what was needed to accomplish his goals (and it isnâ€™t right now).&quot;

I&#039;m not aware he stated that. What he basically said (in his post-tweets) was that he simply didn&#039;t want to talk about it, because doing an early IPO would unnecessarily constrain progress and make for conflicting priorities. Musk&#039;s other companies are publicly traded, so I can only assume this is what he intends for SpaceX eventually.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maybe you need to provide a definition of a â€œvehicle designerâ€, because to me that includes taking into account business strategy.&#8221;</p>
<p>There we simply disagree. Shrug. If I hire a &#8220;vehicle designer&#8221;, it&#8217;s going to be someone who designs vehicles, not someone who worries about business strategy. The definition is right in the words.</p>
<p>&#8220;But that is not what Musk as said. He has stated that he would only IPO if that is what was needed to accomplish his goals (and it isnâ€™t right now).&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not aware he stated that. What he basically said (in his post-tweets) was that he simply didn&#8217;t want to talk about it, because doing an early IPO would unnecessarily constrain progress and make for conflicting priorities. Musk&#8217;s other companies are publicly traded, so I can only assume this is what he intends for SpaceX eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
