<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A minor kerfuffle over LC-39A letters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA whined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Any attempt to say SpaceX refubished LC-40 â€˜on their own dimeâ€™ is simply wrong&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

No, it&#039;s a fact.

In April of 2007 SpaceX was cleared to leased the SLC-40 facility, and in May of 2008 - &lt;b&gt;17 months before the pre-solicitation notice you cite&lt;/b&gt; - SpaceX started demolition of the SLC-40.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/05/launch-pad-demo/&quot; title=&quot;Launch Pad Demolition Clears Way for SpaceX Rockets - Wired Science&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;You can view the demolition video here&lt;/a&gt;.

The first Falcon 9 rocket arrived at SLC-40 in late 2008, and was erected for the first time on January 10, 2009.  That would still be &lt;b&gt;9 months before that pre-solicitation notice you cite&lt;/b&gt;.

So while the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) money was nice, SpaceX hadn&#039;t been counting on it for their use of SLC-40, and had already been spending their own money to make the sight ready for launches.

As usual, you are ignorant of the facts.

End of story.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA whined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Any attempt to say SpaceX refubished LC-40 â€˜on their own dimeâ€™ is simply wrong</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s a fact.</p>
<p>In April of 2007 SpaceX was cleared to leased the SLC-40 facility, and in May of 2008 &#8211; <b>17 months before the pre-solicitation notice you cite</b> &#8211; SpaceX started demolition of the SLC-40.  <a href="http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2008/05/launch-pad-demo/" title="Launch Pad Demolition Clears Way for SpaceX Rockets - Wired Science" rel="nofollow">You can view the demolition video here</a>.</p>
<p>The first Falcon 9 rocket arrived at SLC-40 in late 2008, and was erected for the first time on January 10, 2009.  That would still be <b>9 months before that pre-solicitation notice you cite</b>.</p>
<p>So while the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA) money was nice, SpaceX hadn&#8217;t been counting on it for their use of SLC-40, and had already been spending their own money to make the sight ready for launches.</p>
<p>As usual, you are ignorant of the facts.</p>
<p>End of story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Shipley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Shipley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 08:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Too right.  It&#039;d be dead (and) boring without SpaceX.  What are the odds that a single entrepreneur, namely Elon Musk, came along at what seems to be just the right time?  As they say, timing is everything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too right.  It&#8217;d be dead (and) boring without SpaceX.  What are the odds that a single entrepreneur, namely Elon Musk, came along at what seems to be just the right time?  As they say, timing is everything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Shipley</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neil Shipley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Oct 2013 07:53:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You can find it over on NasaSpaceFlight.com in the SpaceX area of the forum.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can find it over on NasaSpaceFlight.com in the SpaceX area of the forum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426358</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Glenn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Oct 2013 17:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[F9 V1.1 is a huge success and they almost recovered the first stage, competition is awed by Elon Musk. Pshaw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>F9 V1.1 is a huge success and they almost recovered the first stage, competition is awed by Elon Musk. Pshaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426261</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 22:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA whined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Anyobody who thinks the Apollo program was about exploration is nuts.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Which is what we&#039;ve been telling you for YEARS!  Literally years.

To hear you tell it, the Apollo program was created for hero worship reasons, which is why you pretend to be the &quot;Guardian of Apollo&quot; 40+ years on.

So now will you move on?  You know, clear your basement of all those musty/moldy Apollo papers and VHS tapes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA whined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Anyobody who thinks the Apollo program was about exploration is nuts.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Which is what we&#8217;ve been telling you for YEARS!  Literally years.</p>
<p>To hear you tell it, the Apollo program was created for hero worship reasons, which is why you pretend to be the &#8220;Guardian of Apollo&#8221; 40+ years on.</p>
<p>So now will you move on?  You know, clear your basement of all those musty/moldy Apollo papers and VHS tapes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426211</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 17:09:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426211</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, I followed Jeff on twitter. Now I&#039;m hoping someone recorded it as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I followed Jeff on twitter. Now I&#8217;m hoping someone recorded it as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Russell-Gough</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426184</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Russell-Gough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426184</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff Foust covered it on Twitter.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff Foust covered it on Twitter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426175</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 14:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anyone got a URL for the telecom .mp3?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone got a URL for the telecom .mp3?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426158</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Elon Musk awed by competition? Pshaw.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Elon Musk awed by competition? Pshaw.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/09/20/a-minor-kerfuffle-over-lc-39a-letters/#comment-426156</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2013 12:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6597#comment-426156</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[=yawn= As Lovell&#039;s commander on Apollo 8, Frank Borman, so eloquently put it- &#039;Anyobody who thinks the Apollo program was about exploration is nuts.&quot; Hill Andersm Lovell&#039;s other fellow crowman on 8, has stated similar comments as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=yawn= As Lovell&#8217;s commander on Apollo 8, Frank Borman, so eloquently put it- &#8216;Anyobody who thinks the Apollo program was about exploration is nuts.&#8221; Hill Andersm Lovell&#8217;s other fellow crowman on 8, has stated similar comments as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
