<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kepler conference caught in a Chinese puzzle (updated)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edward Ellegood</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/#comment-435136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edward Ellegood]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 02:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6634#comment-435136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but based on the Sec. 535 language posted above, coupled with Rep. Wolf&#039;s clarification of bi-lateral versus multi-lateral, wouldn&#039;t NASA be able to do just about anything with China if a third-party nation was also part of the collaboration?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but based on the Sec. 535 language posted above, coupled with Rep. Wolf&#8217;s clarification of bi-lateral versus multi-lateral, wouldn&#8217;t NASA be able to do just about anything with China if a third-party nation was also part of the collaboration?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amightywind</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/#comment-433341</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amightywind]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6634#comment-433341</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;cite&gt;In it, Bolden blamed the barring of Chinese participants for the Kepler conference on â€œmid-level managers at Amesâ€ acting on their interpretation of NASA rules and without consulting with NASA Headquarters.&lt;/cite&gt;

There seems to be a lot of this going around in the agencies these days. NASA, the Defense Department, the park Service... If Bolden were a leader he&#039;d name names and publicly override the decision. Same goes for Chuck Hagel and the KIA scandal. Same with Hillary at Benghazi... That these anonymous &#039;decisions&#039; are allowed to stand without accountability is pathetic. A decision is made and the herd runs, and keeps running.

Not that the Chinese scientists don&#039;t deserve blanket suspicion. They do. My guess is the average Chinese scientist is more willing to do his country&#039;s bidding than the average NASA scientist, who fancies himself as a righteous international ambassador. We are talking about sophisticated photometers here, the kind that might also be used to track our missiles. Keep the Chinese out!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><cite>In it, Bolden blamed the barring of Chinese participants for the Kepler conference on â€œmid-level managers at Amesâ€ acting on their interpretation of NASA rules and without consulting with NASA Headquarters.</cite></p>
<p>There seems to be a lot of this going around in the agencies these days. NASA, the Defense Department, the park Service&#8230; If Bolden were a leader he&#8217;d name names and publicly override the decision. Same goes for Chuck Hagel and the KIA scandal. Same with Hillary at Benghazi&#8230; That these anonymous &#8216;decisions&#8217; are allowed to stand without accountability is pathetic. A decision is made and the herd runs, and keeps running.</p>
<p>Not that the Chinese scientists don&#8217;t deserve blanket suspicion. They do. My guess is the average Chinese scientist is more willing to do his country&#8217;s bidding than the average NASA scientist, who fancies himself as a righteous international ambassador. We are talking about sophisticated photometers here, the kind that might also be used to track our missiles. Keep the Chinese out!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Foust</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/#comment-433307</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeff Foust]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6634#comment-433307</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please keep comments on the topic of the post. Thank you again for your cooperation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please keep comments on the topic of the post. Thank you again for your cooperation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sftommy</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/#comment-433293</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sftommy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6634#comment-433293</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, Russia replaces it&#039;s Roscosmos chief.

With a deputy defense minister, the commander of the military&#039;s space forces.
Portends for the future?

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24473120&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;BBC NEWS: Russia Space!&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, Russia replaces it&#8217;s Roscosmos chief.</p>
<p>With a deputy defense minister, the commander of the military&#8217;s space forces.<br />
Portends for the future?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-24473120" rel="nofollow">BBC NEWS: Russia Space!</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/#comment-433024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 19:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6634#comment-433024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Off topic but breaking news if accurate ... CollectSPACE reports that Scott Carpenter has passed away:

http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-101013b.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Off topic but breaking news if accurate &#8230; CollectSPACE reports that Scott Carpenter has passed away:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-101013b.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.collectspace.com/news/news-101013b.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Blue Nine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/10/10/kepler-conference-caught-in-a-chinese-puzzle/#comment-432901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Blue Nine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 17:47:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6634#comment-432901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading Wolf&#039;s letter to Bolden is like reading an incoherent, rambling rant in a local newspaper from an angry, senile neighbor who is off his meds.  It&#039;s amazing that the House leadership still let him run a committee.  The man needs medical help, not more responsibilities (or reelection).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Wolf&#8217;s letter to Bolden is like reading an incoherent, rambling rant in a local newspaper from an angry, senile neighbor who is off his meds.  It&#8217;s amazing that the House leadership still let him run a committee.  The man needs medical help, not more responsibilities (or reelection).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
