<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New national space transportation policy makes modest, not major, changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/11/22/new-national-space-transportation-policy-makes-modest-not-major-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/11/22/new-national-space-transportation-policy-makes-modest-not-major-changes/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=new-national-space-transportation-policy-makes-modest-not-major-changes</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/11/22/new-national-space-transportation-policy-makes-modest-not-major-changes/#comment-441577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Charles Miller]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6713#comment-441577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the comparative analysis Jeff.  I was thinking about doing this myself, but you saved me the time.  

Onwards and upwards,

- Charles]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comparative analysis Jeff.  I was thinking about doing this myself, but you saved me the time.  </p>
<p>Onwards and upwards,</p>
<p>&#8211; Charles</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Blue Nine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/11/22/new-national-space-transportation-policy-makes-modest-not-major-changes/#comment-441566</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Blue Nine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 15:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6713#comment-441566</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A limp update that makes no hard choices in an industry with vast oversupply and an unaffordable and uncompetitive decades-old infrastructure.  Boeing&#039;s endorsement bears this out:

&quot;Boeing applauds the presidentâ€™s balanced approach to developing affordable commercial crew and cargo transportation in areas of proven technology, while he simultaneously accepts the challenge for the United States â€“ as the worldâ€™s leader in space exploration...

As we have for more than 50 years, Boeing supports NASAâ€™s spaceflight endeavors, working with our customer to achieve affordable commercial crew and cargo transportation under NASAâ€™s Commercial Crew program, as well as Americaâ€™s heavy-lift rocket to beyond Earth orbit, the Space Launch System.&quot;

Translation: Great, we get to keep feeding out of both of these troughs! 

A real policy update would have made some hard choices between Shuttle-derived, EELV, and new entrants, shutting down one of those three legs.  Genericizing references to SLS and EELV and adding flowery language about innovative propulsion and contracting techniques that almost never get funded doesn&#039;t fix the industry&#039;s fundamental problems and continues to pass the back to the taxpayer.

I expected a lot better from Rich DalBello&#039;s return to OSTP.  If DalBello going to pass along pointless policy updates like this, he&#039;s not earning his taxpayer-supported salary and should head back to Intelsat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A limp update that makes no hard choices in an industry with vast oversupply and an unaffordable and uncompetitive decades-old infrastructure.  Boeing&#8217;s endorsement bears this out:</p>
<p>&#8220;Boeing applauds the presidentâ€™s balanced approach to developing affordable commercial crew and cargo transportation in areas of proven technology, while he simultaneously accepts the challenge for the United States â€“ as the worldâ€™s leader in space exploration&#8230;</p>
<p>As we have for more than 50 years, Boeing supports NASAâ€™s spaceflight endeavors, working with our customer to achieve affordable commercial crew and cargo transportation under NASAâ€™s Commercial Crew program, as well as Americaâ€™s heavy-lift rocket to beyond Earth orbit, the Space Launch System.&#8221;</p>
<p>Translation: Great, we get to keep feeding out of both of these troughs! </p>
<p>A real policy update would have made some hard choices between Shuttle-derived, EELV, and new entrants, shutting down one of those three legs.  Genericizing references to SLS and EELV and adding flowery language about innovative propulsion and contracting techniques that almost never get funded doesn&#8217;t fix the industry&#8217;s fundamental problems and continues to pass the back to the taxpayer.</p>
<p>I expected a lot better from Rich DalBello&#8217;s return to OSTP.  If DalBello going to pass along pointless policy updates like this, he&#8217;s not earning his taxpayer-supported salary and should head back to Intelsat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Webber</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/11/22/new-national-space-transportation-policy-makes-modest-not-major-changes/#comment-441554</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Derek Webber]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Nov 2013 13:07:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6713#comment-441554</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A good summary, parsing out the subtle changes. 
Derek Webber]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good summary, parsing out the subtle changes.<br />
Derek Webber</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
