<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Committee delays consideration of termination liability bill until next week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Russell-Gough</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/#comment-444273</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben Russell-Gough]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 16:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6746#comment-444273</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The story is interesting. It&#039;s obvious that every Rep will be looking to put their constituents&#039; project on the &#039;protected&#039; list. Ultimately, practically the entire NASA budget could end up protected in this manner, no matter how weird or trivial the line item just to get a majority to go to the voting stage. I think that the whole thing may yet die stillborn because it will become unimplementable.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The story is interesting. It&#8217;s obvious that every Rep will be looking to put their constituents&#8217; project on the &#8216;protected&#8217; list. Ultimately, practically the entire NASA budget could end up protected in this manner, no matter how weird or trivial the line item just to get a majority to go to the voting stage. I think that the whole thing may yet die stillborn because it will become unimplementable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lars</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/#comment-444231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lars]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Dec 2013 01:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6746#comment-444231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed. I have argued for a while that a successful flight of Falcon Heavy will put SLS in a dire situation. Yes, it only has 40-70% of the SLS capacity to LEO (depending on SLS version) - but the price difference might be too much ignore.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed. I have argued for a while that a successful flight of Falcon Heavy will put SLS in a dire situation. Yes, it only has 40-70% of the SLS capacity to LEO (depending on SLS version) &#8211; but the price difference might be too much ignore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mader Levap</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/#comment-444171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mader Levap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2013 15:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6746#comment-444171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is just me or someone there s**t bricks on mere thought of Falcon Heavy, appearing more real than ever with recent successful second flight of F9 v1.1?

Falcon Heavy online = death of Senate Launch System aka monster porkrocket. It is simple like that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just me or someone there s**t bricks on mere thought of Falcon Heavy, appearing more real than ever with recent successful second flight of F9 v1.1?</p>
<p>Falcon Heavy online = death of Senate Launch System aka monster porkrocket. It is simple like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/#comment-444097</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Dec 2013 01:15:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6746#comment-444097</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vulture4 wrote:

&lt;i&gt;So who can we call to argue about this? Is there anyone on the committee that is opposed to pork?&lt;/i&gt;

Dana Rohrabacher, but he&#039;s a lone voice in the wilderness.

Even if this clears the House, it remains to be seen how the Senate will react.  As much as Bill Nelson and Ted Cruz are protecting SLS, this might be too much even for them.

If it gets grafted into another bill, it could always be deleted on the chamber floor.

This disgusting idea has a long way to go.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vulture4 wrote:</p>
<p><i>So who can we call to argue about this? Is there anyone on the committee that is opposed to pork?</i></p>
<p>Dana Rohrabacher, but he&#8217;s a lone voice in the wilderness.</p>
<p>Even if this clears the House, it remains to be seen how the Senate will react.  As much as Bill Nelson and Ted Cruz are protecting SLS, this might be too much even for them.</p>
<p>If it gets grafted into another bill, it could always be deleted on the chamber floor.</p>
<p>This disgusting idea has a long way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/#comment-443948</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 17:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6746#comment-443948</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So who can we call to argue about this? Is there anyone on the committee that is opposed to pork?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So who can we call to argue about this? Is there anyone on the committee that is opposed to pork?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2013/12/06/committee-delays-consideration-of-termination-liability-bill-until-next-week/#comment-443773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Dec 2013 00:31:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6746#comment-443773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you mean Mo Brooks, not Bill Posey. :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you mean Mo Brooks, not Bill Posey. <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
