<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nye: NASA&#8217;s asteroid mission concept won&#8217;t happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-455583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jan 2014 18:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-455583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welcome to the Spin Cycle, guest.

The facts of Reality never intrude on the manned space fantasists&#039; reveries.

Some people call it American Exceptionalism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welcome to the Spin Cycle, guest.</p>
<p>The facts of Reality never intrude on the manned space fantasists&#8217; reveries.</p>
<p>Some people call it American Exceptionalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2014 02:54:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA opined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Projects of scale take time but inevitably fly.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Yep, of which the current &quot;government project of scale&quot; is the ISS.  And now NASA plans to extend it&#039;s mission.

Galling, eh?  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA opined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Projects of scale take time but inevitably fly.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Yep, of which the current &#8220;government project of scale&#8221; is the ISS.  And now NASA plans to extend it&#8217;s mission.</p>
<p>Galling, eh?  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Egad</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Egad]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 14:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The &lt;i&gt;Space News&lt;/i&gt; article says,

&lt;i&gt; Once corralled into the distant lunar orbit, the captured asteroid would, according to NASAâ€™s current plans, be visited by human explorers using the Orion crew capsule and Space Launch System (SLS) heavy-lift rocket the agency is working on. &lt;strong&gt;That mission would notionally take place around 2025&lt;/strong&gt;...&lt;/i&gt;

2025 is where the current schedule has EM-4, presumably leaving EM-1 and EM-2 in 2017 and 2021 as some sort of circumlunar missions, perhaps to the DRO proposed for the asteroid. EM-3, using the version of SLS with new boosters in 2023, still lacks an identified purpose.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <i>Space News</i> article says,</p>
<p><i> Once corralled into the distant lunar orbit, the captured asteroid would, according to NASAâ€™s current plans, be visited by human explorers using the Orion crew capsule and Space Launch System (SLS) heavy-lift rocket the agency is working on. <strong>That mission would notionally take place around 2025</strong>&#8230;</i></p>
<p>2025 is where the current schedule has EM-4, presumably leaving EM-1 and EM-2 in 2017 and 2021 as some sort of circumlunar missions, perhaps to the DRO proposed for the asteroid. EM-3, using the version of SLS with new boosters in 2023, still lacks an identified purpose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:20:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rest easy, Windy. Space policy is in free drift for the rest of the Obama administration. as the PRC knows. Look to HRC as the Red Moon rises.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rest easy, Windy. Space policy is in free drift for the rest of the Obama administration. as the PRC knows. Look to HRC as the Red Moon rises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Galling, eh?  

It has been for commercial space since over the past half century, it has flown nobody. Projects of scale take time but inevitably fly. Not so for commercial HAF-- which has failed to even attempt to orbit anybody. Ron.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Galling, eh?  </p>
<p>It has been for commercial space since over the past half century, it has flown nobody. Projects of scale take time but inevitably fly. Not so for commercial HAF&#8211; which has failed to even attempt to orbit anybody. Ron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DCSCA</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452193</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DCSCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 12:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452193</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Space News reports that NASA has already identified about a dozen potential targets for the ARM

=yawn= NASA identified Mas as a target for manned missions. National Geographic, March, 1964]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space News reports that NASA has already identified about a dozen potential targets for the ARM</p>
<p>=yawn= NASA identified Mas as a target for manned missions. National Geographic, March, 1964</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 06:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA confusedly said:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Have you priced a Tesla lately? Musk is not going to be the Henry Ford of space&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Do you get confused in conversations easily?  Find it hard to concentrate on the subject at hand?

Because why in the world would the price of a car have ANYTHING to do with the price of transporting a satellite to LEO or GTO?

Let me make this as simple as possible.  One is a high-end product that addresses a known market for high-end performance cars.  The other is a commodity service to transport payloads to specific orbits around Earth.

And since ESA and China have already acknowledged that they can&#039;t match SpaceX in price, I&#039;d say the facts speak for themselves - Musk is not trying to be the Henry Ford of space, Musk is making SpaceX the SpaceX of space transportation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA confusedly said:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Have you priced a Tesla lately? Musk is not going to be the Henry Ford of space</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Do you get confused in conversations easily?  Find it hard to concentrate on the subject at hand?</p>
<p>Because why in the world would the price of a car have ANYTHING to do with the price of transporting a satellite to LEO or GTO?</p>
<p>Let me make this as simple as possible.  One is a high-end product that addresses a known market for high-end performance cars.  The other is a commodity service to transport payloads to specific orbits around Earth.</p>
<p>And since ESA and China have already acknowledged that they can&#8217;t match SpaceX in price, I&#8217;d say the facts speak for themselves &#8211; Musk is not trying to be the Henry Ford of space, Musk is making SpaceX the SpaceX of space transportation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 05:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First DCSCA whined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;...and what is going on is government space projectsâ€“ you know, ISS...&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

Then DCSCA whined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;The future you crave is one of going in circles, no where, fast.&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

It&#039;s funny that you don&#039;t recognize that the only current &quot;government project of scale&quot; is the one that is &quot;going in circles&quot;.  No other HSF missions are planned or funded at this time.

Galling, eh?  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First DCSCA whined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>&#8230;and what is going on is government space projectsâ€“ you know, ISS&#8230;</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>Then DCSCA whined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>The future you crave is one of going in circles, no where, fast.</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s funny that you don&#8217;t recognize that the only current &#8220;government project of scale&#8221; is the one that is &#8220;going in circles&#8221;.  No other HSF missions are planned or funded at this time.</p>
<p>Galling, eh?  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 05:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA whined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;...what has been â€˜unfolding for yearsâ€™ is the failure of SpaceX even attempt to fly anybody...&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

How can it be a failure when it&#039;s been the plan all along?  Your inability to understand what&#039;s going on is breathtaking.

And no one cares about your misapprehension about when things are supposed to happen.  NASA and the Commercial Crew participants have no idea you exist, and I see nothing that will change that...  ;-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA whined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>&#8230;what has been â€˜unfolding for yearsâ€™ is the failure of SpaceX even attempt to fly anybody&#8230;</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>How can it be a failure when it&#8217;s been the plan all along?  Your inability to understand what&#8217;s going on is breathtaking.</p>
<p>And no one cares about your misapprehension about when things are supposed to happen.  NASA and the Commercial Crew participants have no idea you exist, and I see nothing that will change that&#8230;  <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif" alt=";-)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coastal Ron</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/03/nye-nasas-asteroid-mission-concept-wont-happen/#comment-452017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Coastal Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2014 05:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6794#comment-452017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DCSCA whined:

&quot;&lt;i&gt;Space X launched a satellite. Welcome to 1957&lt;/i&gt;&quot;

SpaceX launched a satellite to GTO for $56.5M.  Welcome to 2014.

As usual you don&#039;t understand why what SpaceX is doing is different than what has come before.  Until you understand why, you will continue to be clueless.  Stop being clueless.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DCSCA whined:</p>
<p>&#8220;<i>Space X launched a satellite. Welcome to 1957</i>&#8221;</p>
<p>SpaceX launched a satellite to GTO for $56.5M.  Welcome to 2014.</p>
<p>As usual you don&#8217;t understand why what SpaceX is doing is different than what has come before.  Until you understand why, you will continue to be clueless.  Stop being clueless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
