<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress may need a little more time to complete FY14 appropriations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/10/congress-may-need-a-little-more-time-to-complete-fy14-appropriations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/10/congress-may-need-a-little-more-time-to-complete-fy14-appropriations/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=congress-may-need-a-little-more-time-to-complete-fy14-appropriations</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malmesbury</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/10/congress-may-need-a-little-more-time-to-complete-fy14-appropriations/#comment-455402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malmesbury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jan 2014 16:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6806#comment-455402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To put the $352 million in a real space context.... That is more than NASA paid Orbital under COTS. The price of a new rocket and cargo delivery capsule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To put the $352 million in a real space context&#8230;. That is more than NASA paid Orbital under COTS. The price of a new rocket and cargo delivery capsule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: common sense</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/10/congress-may-need-a-little-more-time-to-complete-fy14-appropriations/#comment-454212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[common sense]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 21:04:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6806#comment-454212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Considering NASA did not want SLS and Congress forced it I would not hold my breath. 

The whole program was a directive from Congress to waste money so what&#039;s $352M ?

Oh well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Considering NASA did not want SLS and Congress forced it I would not hold my breath. </p>
<p>The whole program was a directive from Congress to waste money so what&#8217;s $352M ?</p>
<p>Oh well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Blue Nine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/01/10/congress-may-need-a-little-more-time-to-complete-fy14-appropriations/#comment-454195</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Blue Nine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jan 2014 20:46:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6806#comment-454195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since the NASA IG found that the SLS program wasted $352 million on an unneeded, duplicative SSC test stand, maybe Congress could cut the FY14 SLS budget by the same amount and redirect those funds somewhere useful.

http://nasawatch.com/archives/2014/01/oig-slaps-nasa.html

Instead of papering over pork, Congress could actually exercise its oversight function for once.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since the NASA IG found that the SLS program wasted $352 million on an unneeded, duplicative SSC test stand, maybe Congress could cut the FY14 SLS budget by the same amount and redirect those funds somewhere useful.</p>
<p><a href="http://nasawatch.com/archives/2014/01/oig-slaps-nasa.html" rel="nofollow">http://nasawatch.com/archives/2014/01/oig-slaps-nasa.html</a></p>
<p>Instead of papering over pork, Congress could actually exercise its oversight function for once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
