<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wolf criticizes NASA for &#8220;persistent organizational culture&#8221; that creates security issues</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiram</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-474561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hiram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Feb 2014 05:11:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-474561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;You still do not get it.&quot;

I have never quoted, nor have been &quot;opining upon&quot; impact hazard estimates. You&#039;re just making that up. Is that how you do your &quot;science&quot;? Impacts are real threats, and we should be doing more to mitigate them. But, as I&#039;ve been saying for a long time (though not in this thread), the human space flight part of ARM simply isn&#039;t an effective way to do it. 

I never said anyone was doing anything for the &quot;fun of it&quot;. That&#039;s an amusing characterization. Developing applied technology is hugely important. If you want to mitigate impact of a large approaching asteroid, astrodynamic smarts and skilled trajectory and approach planning are essential. Maybe the Chinese want to be able to deflect an approaching asteroid just as much as we would. But perhaps you&#039;re saying we shouldn&#039;t let them do it? 

If you want to argue with me, then please at least argue with something that I said. I have no desire to participate in illusory and strawman arguments.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;You still do not get it.&#8221;</p>
<p>I have never quoted, nor have been &#8220;opining upon&#8221; impact hazard estimates. You&#8217;re just making that up. Is that how you do your &#8220;science&#8221;? Impacts are real threats, and we should be doing more to mitigate them. But, as I&#8217;ve been saying for a long time (though not in this thread), the human space flight part of ARM simply isn&#8217;t an effective way to do it. </p>
<p>I never said anyone was doing anything for the &#8220;fun of it&#8221;. That&#8217;s an amusing characterization. Developing applied technology is hugely important. If you want to mitigate impact of a large approaching asteroid, astrodynamic smarts and skilled trajectory and approach planning are essential. Maybe the Chinese want to be able to deflect an approaching asteroid just as much as we would. But perhaps you&#8217;re saying we shouldn&#8217;t let them do it? </p>
<p>If you want to argue with me, then please at least argue with something that I said. I have no desire to participate in illusory and strawman arguments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-474452</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 22:37:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-474452</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Hiram - 

You still do not get it.

&quot;The Chinese chase asteroids robotically, just as we continue to do. Itâ€™s a terrific way of proving your precision astrodynamic smarts, as well as trajectory and approach planning.&quot;

This is actually the development of an applied technology, not simply something done for the fun of it.

You probably wish the world would ignore it, but the US sent its mitigation plan to the UN committee on space. Russia and China will be doing the same thing shortly.

You keep on repeating 40 year old impact hazard estimates. I wish you would catch up with today&#039;s knowledge of the impact hazard before opining on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hiram &#8211; </p>
<p>You still do not get it.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Chinese chase asteroids robotically, just as we continue to do. Itâ€™s a terrific way of proving your precision astrodynamic smarts, as well as trajectory and approach planning.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is actually the development of an applied technology, not simply something done for the fun of it.</p>
<p>You probably wish the world would ignore it, but the US sent its mitigation plan to the UN committee on space. Russia and China will be doing the same thing shortly.</p>
<p>You keep on repeating 40 year old impact hazard estimates. I wish you would catch up with today&#8217;s knowledge of the impact hazard before opining on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hiram</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473930</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hiram]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2014 00:49:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;It appears that you have forgotten CE2â€²s asteroid fly-by.&quot;

You mean with regard to the Chinese chasing asteroids? What Wolf demanded was that the U.S. stop chasing asteroids *with people*. Yours is a fair point that I should have made that explicit. I don&#039;t think Frank Wolf had any problem with NEAR, nor does he lose sleep over Dawn, or OSIRIS-REx. (But as to losing sleep, if it weren&#039;t for those Chinese under his bed ...)

Of course, his December 19, 2013 letter to the President was pretty explicit in this regard. He said ... &quot;I have been concerned by this administration&#039;s misguided focus on capturing an asteroid to place in lunar orbit for American astronauts to visit.&quot;

The Chinese chase asteroids robotically, just as we continue to do. It&#039;s a terrific way of proving your precision astrodynamic smarts, as well as trajectory and approach planning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It appears that you have forgotten CE2â€²s asteroid fly-by.&#8221;</p>
<p>You mean with regard to the Chinese chasing asteroids? What Wolf demanded was that the U.S. stop chasing asteroids *with people*. Yours is a fair point that I should have made that explicit. I don&#8217;t think Frank Wolf had any problem with NEAR, nor does he lose sleep over Dawn, or OSIRIS-REx. (But as to losing sleep, if it weren&#8217;t for those Chinese under his bed &#8230;)</p>
<p>Of course, his December 19, 2013 letter to the President was pretty explicit in this regard. He said &#8230; &#8220;I have been concerned by this administration&#8217;s misguided focus on capturing an asteroid to place in lunar orbit for American astronauts to visit.&#8221;</p>
<p>The Chinese chase asteroids robotically, just as we continue to do. It&#8217;s a terrific way of proving your precision astrodynamic smarts, as well as trajectory and approach planning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E.P. Grondine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473920</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[E.P. Grondine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 21:28:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Hiram -

It appears that you have forgotten CE2&#039;s asteroid fly-by.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hiram &#8211;</p>
<p>It appears that you have forgotten CE2&#8217;s asteroid fly-by.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malmesbury</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malmesbury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 13:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The stolen technology meme for the Chinese is actually more often false than it is true.

What they tend to do is to buy up old systems/technology, produce their own version and proceed from there. A rather sensible way to create a capability.

For example, they *bought* the design for Soyuz, complete with a design for a Soyuz upgrade. From this they engineered the Shenzhou program...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stolen technology meme for the Chinese is actually more often false than it is true.</p>
<p>What they tend to do is to buy up old systems/technology, produce their own version and proceed from there. A rather sensible way to create a capability.</p>
<p>For example, they *bought* the design for Soyuz, complete with a design for a Soyuz upgrade. From this they engineered the Shenzhou program&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malmesbury</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Malmesbury]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2014 13:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the classic behavior of a security organisation that has screwed up with an arrest - find *something*

In the UK, a favorite of mine was the story of how the police no-knocked a house after a report of a silhouette of someone holding a gun was seen. Turned out that the guy who lived there had a Lara Croft promotional figure from the video rental shop he worked at in his living room.

The police tried to charge him with having a weapon - the dummy guns held by the figure!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the classic behavior of a security organisation that has screwed up with an arrest &#8211; find *something*</p>
<p>In the UK, a favorite of mine was the story of how the police no-knocked a house after a report of a silhouette of someone holding a gun was seen. Turned out that the guy who lived there had a Lara Croft promotional figure from the video rental shop he worked at in his living room.</p>
<p>The police tried to charge him with having a weapon &#8211; the dummy guns held by the figure!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473650</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473650</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As far as i can tell, the porn was on Bo&#039;s personal computer, not one belonging to NASA. It was implied he downloaded it over an official NASA network but no evidence was presented. In fact, accessing porn sites from a NASA network is supposed to trigger an improper use alarm, so it&#039;s not clear how this could have been done.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as i can tell, the porn was on Bo&#8217;s personal computer, not one belonging to NASA. It was implied he downloaded it over an official NASA network but no evidence was presented. In fact, accessing porn sites from a NASA network is supposed to trigger an improper use alarm, so it&#8217;s not clear how this could have been done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wait till he discovers there are Chinese restaurants - in Washington DC!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait till he discovers there are Chinese restaurants &#8211; in Washington DC!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vulture4</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vulture4]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 15:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big problem NASA has is that access by foreign nationals is far too DIFFICULT to be competitive with other launch sites in an era when both science and commercial operations are international. It can take months to get a clearance. And then you can only get a temporary clearance for up to 30 days, but if you need anything longer than that (say a launch slips) the foreign national can&#039;t stay over 30 days without a higher-level clearance, which takes lots of money and time. What sense does that make???? It&#039;s safe to let someone have access for 30 days, but we won&#039;t let him stay 31 because he might be a terrorist???]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The big problem NASA has is that access by foreign nationals is far too DIFFICULT to be competitive with other launch sites in an era when both science and commercial operations are international. It can take months to get a clearance. And then you can only get a temporary clearance for up to 30 days, but if you need anything longer than that (say a launch slips) the foreign national can&#8217;t stay over 30 days without a higher-level clearance, which takes lots of money and time. What sense does that make???? It&#8217;s safe to let someone have access for 30 days, but we won&#8217;t let him stay 31 because he might be a terrorist???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/02/14/wolf-criticizes-nasa-for-persistent-organizational-culture-that-creates-security-issues/#comment-473574</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen C. Smith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:41:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=6873#comment-473574</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I bet Frank Wolf never goes out for Chinese food.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet Frank Wolf never goes out for Chinese food.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
