<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is ULA going its own way for an RD-180 replacement?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-490419</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Lynch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 03:43:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-490419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dick, you&#039;re a hoot! Thanks for the miles of smiles :)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyhaTQseKTQ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dick, you&#8217;re a hoot! Thanks for the miles of smiles <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /><br />
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyhaTQseKTQ" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lyhaTQseKTQ</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-490059</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 08:18:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-490059</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As Glenn Reynolds frequently says, today&#039;s political class is the worst we&#039;ve had in the nation&#039;s history.  Supporting data points, one of which you note here, may be found in abundance.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As Glenn Reynolds frequently says, today&#8217;s political class is the worst we&#8217;ve had in the nation&#8217;s history.  Supporting data points, one of which you note here, may be found in abundance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dark Blue Nine</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dark Blue Nine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2014 23:53:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Meanwhile, in an op-ed in The Hill today, Peter Marquez, former director of space policy at the National Security Council, argues for a â€œpragmaticâ€ approach to the future of the RD-180 engine and development of a domestic replacement... â€œThe best way ahead is a pragmatic path where the United States can utilize the RD-180 in the near term, while developing our own propulsion capabilities.â€

Well, duh...

Of course we have to buy as many RD-180s as we can before the line is shut off to us while developing our own designs and production ASAP.

Is this the kind of obvious &quot;insight&quot; that Marquez was paid to deliver while he staffed the National Security Council?

Besides rubber-stamping repeated waivers on Atlas V engine production, what actions did Marquez take to reduce reliance on foreign rocket engines during his three-plus-year tenure as Director of Space Policy?

Oh right, nada.

What a joke...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile, in an op-ed in The Hill today, Peter Marquez, former director of space policy at the National Security Council, argues for a â€œpragmaticâ€ approach to the future of the RD-180 engine and development of a domestic replacement&#8230; â€œThe best way ahead is a pragmatic path where the United States can utilize the RD-180 in the near term, while developing our own propulsion capabilities.â€</p>
<p>Well, duh&#8230;</p>
<p>Of course we have to buy as many RD-180s as we can before the line is shut off to us while developing our own designs and production ASAP.</p>
<p>Is this the kind of obvious &#8220;insight&#8221; that Marquez was paid to deliver while he staffed the National Security Council?</p>
<p>Besides rubber-stamping repeated waivers on Atlas V engine production, what actions did Marquez take to reduce reliance on foreign rocket engines during his three-plus-year tenure as Director of Space Policy?</p>
<p>Oh right, nada.</p>
<p>What a joke&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489569</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2014 00:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;howâ€™d they manage that permanent waiver?&lt;/i&gt;

In the dark of night around a guttering candle flame in a ruined abbey with their demonic familiars by their sides I suppose.  You know - the usual.

&lt;i&gt;Shouldnâ€™t they have at least been trying to make a replacement in the past few years?&lt;/i&gt;

Nah, that&#039;s just What Jesus Would Do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>howâ€™d they manage that permanent waiver?</i></p>
<p>In the dark of night around a guttering candle flame in a ruined abbey with their demonic familiars by their sides I suppose.  You know &#8211; the usual.</p>
<p><i>Shouldnâ€™t they have at least been trying to make a replacement in the past few years?</i></p>
<p>Nah, that&#8217;s just What Jesus Would Do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesus</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jesus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 22:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s interesting, how&#039;d they manage that permanent waiver? Shouldn&#039;t they have at least been trying to make a replacement in the past few years?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s interesting, how&#8217;d they manage that permanent waiver? Shouldn&#8217;t they have at least been trying to make a replacement in the past few years?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489408</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;Without engines, what are they going to do with all those employees until the replacement engineâ€™s ready in 2019?&lt;/i&gt;

Feed them on that billion a year they get for &quot;maintaining capability&quot; maybe?  Damned good question in any case.  I don&#039;t see any scenario in which ULA gets a new engine soon enough to save either Atlas V or their whole company.

&lt;i&gt;The Air Force has admitted the lack of engines will result in years of delays for a large number of high priority payloads.&lt;/i&gt;

Or the Falcon Heavy will get certified perhaps as soon as the end of next year and start clearing that backlog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Without engines, what are they going to do with all those employees until the replacement engineâ€™s ready in 2019?</i></p>
<p>Feed them on that billion a year they get for &#8220;maintaining capability&#8221; maybe?  Damned good question in any case.  I don&#8217;t see any scenario in which ULA gets a new engine soon enough to save either Atlas V or their whole company.</p>
<p><i>The Air Force has admitted the lack of engines will result in years of delays for a large number of high priority payloads.</i></p>
<p>Or the Falcon Heavy will get certified perhaps as soon as the end of next year and start clearing that backlog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489407</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489407</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, they just quit selling natural gas to Ukraine.  Compared to that, what they were getting from RD-180 sales is chump change.  The RD-180 is no swallow and ULA is no Mission San Juan Capistrano - they ain&#039;t coming back.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, they just quit selling natural gas to Ukraine.  Compared to that, what they were getting from RD-180 sales is chump change.  The RD-180 is no swallow and ULA is no Mission San Juan Capistrano &#8211; they ain&#8217;t coming back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dick Eagleson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dick Eagleson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 12:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think you picked a bad week to stop sniffing glue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you picked a bad week to stop sniffing glue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 02:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I meant 39A not 39B. Sorry.  Temporary insanity.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant 39A not 39B. Sorry.  Temporary insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/17/is-ula-going-its-own-way-for-an-rd-180-replacement/#comment-489319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2014 02:16:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7187#comment-489319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Would these satellites requiring such a clean room be the larger ones (FH) or smaller ones (F9)?  Or a mix?  I&#039;m curious about if we would be talking about 39B or SLC-40 or both.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Would these satellites requiring such a clean room be the larger ones (FH) or smaller ones (F9)?  Or a mix?  I&#8217;m curious about if we would be talking about 39B or SLC-40 or both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
