<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shelby reiterates his support for commercial crew pricing language as Nelson seeks changes to it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it</link>
	<description>Because sometimes the most important orbit is the Beltway...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 13:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Lynch</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Lynch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2014 00:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Don&#039;t feed the trolls.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t feed the trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yg1968</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yg1968]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad that you are doing something about it. Thanks for your efforts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad that you are doing something about it. Thanks for your efforts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490355</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Probably twitter. And emails.  And rants on blogs. Maybe the Hitler video put it over the top. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probably twitter. And emails.  And rants on blogs. Maybe the Hitler video put it over the top. <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donald F. Robertson</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Donald F. Robertson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 17:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;SpaceX problem so far is that they dont know how to handle failure.&lt;/i&gt;

I agree.  Every time there is a failure, they seem to compound it by shooting themselves in the public relations foot.  Much as I admire Elon, it is my opinion that this stupidity comes from the top. 

BTW, there was a Twitter campaign to get SpaceX to reconsider.  I wonder if that had an influence in the quick reversal of course. . . .

-- Donald]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>SpaceX problem so far is that they dont know how to handle failure.</i></p>
<p>I agree.  Every time there is a failure, they seem to compound it by shooting themselves in the public relations foot.  Much as I admire Elon, it is my opinion that this stupidity comes from the top. </p>
<p>BTW, there was a Twitter campaign to get SpaceX to reconsider.  I wonder if that had an influence in the quick reversal of course. . . .</p>
<p>&#8212; Donald</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490324</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SpaceX problem so far is that they dont know how to handle failure.

they simply turn off the press coverage go dark and let some time pass and then hope that all is forgiven when theyh turn the lights back on.

And its silly RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SpaceX problem so far is that they dont know how to handle failure.</p>
<p>they simply turn off the press coverage go dark and let some time pass and then hope that all is forgiven when theyh turn the lights back on.</p>
<p>And its silly RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2014 02:41:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The lack of webcast has caused a lot of heartburn:

https://vidd.me/sk9]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of webcast has caused a lot of heartburn:</p>
<p><a href="https://vidd.me/sk9" rel="nofollow">https://vidd.me/sk9</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490137</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 19:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490137</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back By Popular Demand? 
 
SpaceX says they&#039;re gonna webcast today&#039;s launch attempt.  But the weather is only 20% GO at this time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back By Popular Demand? </p>
<p>SpaceX says they&#8217;re gonna webcast today&#8217;s launch attempt.  But the weather is only 20% GO at this time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Nobles</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim Nobles]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 16:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, ULA is mounting a PR blitz and SpaceX decides to go dark.  Makes no sense at all.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, ULA is mounting a PR blitz and SpaceX decides to go dark.  Makes no sense at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michael Kent
June 21, 2014 at 5:36 pm

â€œThe issue is very much cost-plus versus fixed price. In fact, thatâ€™s the whole issue.â€

No, it is not. The issue is certified cost and pricing data. It has nothing to do with either fixed-price or cost-plus contracting.&gt;&gt;

none of the things you mentioned are a service...they are a product but SpaceX is providng a service...think Boeing supplying 737 Maxs to SWA  RGO]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael Kent<br />
June 21, 2014 at 5:36 pm</p>
<p>â€œThe issue is very much cost-plus versus fixed price. In fact, thatâ€™s the whole issue.â€</p>
<p>No, it is not. The issue is certified cost and pricing data. It has nothing to do with either fixed-price or cost-plus contracting.&gt;&gt;</p>
<p>none of the things you mentioned are a service&#8230;they are a product but SpaceX is providng a service&#8230;think Boeing supplying 737 Maxs to SWA  RGO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert G. Oler</title>
		<link>http://www.spacepolitics.com/2014/06/19/shelby-reiterates-his-support-for-commercial-crew-pricing-language-as-nelson-seeks-changes-to-it/#comment-490095</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert G. Oler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jun 2014 14:03:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.spacepolitics.com/?p=7195#comment-490095</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[KC at NASAWATCH and I frequently &quot;dust up&quot; over almost anything :)  but his piece about SpaceX cancelling its web feed is right on and its hard to improve on his words so I&#039;ll just repost them with all credit to him

&quot; This lack of visibility is rather unusual for SpaceX - a company that has gone out of its way to use social media and traditional media - with great success - to get word about its products and services to the widest audience possible. Indeed, just a week or so ago there was a large reception for the Dragon V2 in Washington DC and the news media was all over it. Flash forward. SpaceX explained this absence of a webcast yesterday as being due to the fact that these launches were becoming routine and that the webcasts are no longer needed. This was a little odd given that they had a webcast for the Friday launch attempt. Yes, they are a private company and this is a commercial activity, so they have every right to do this. But that does not mean its the smart thing to do.&quot;

It is a dumb thing to do and thats from me  Robert G. Oler]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KC at NASAWATCH and I frequently &#8220;dust up&#8221; over almost anything <img src="http://www.spacepolitics.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":)" class="wp-smiley" />  but his piece about SpaceX cancelling its web feed is right on and its hard to improve on his words so I&#8217;ll just repost them with all credit to him</p>
<p>&#8221; This lack of visibility is rather unusual for SpaceX &#8211; a company that has gone out of its way to use social media and traditional media &#8211; with great success &#8211; to get word about its products and services to the widest audience possible. Indeed, just a week or so ago there was a large reception for the Dragon V2 in Washington DC and the news media was all over it. Flash forward. SpaceX explained this absence of a webcast yesterday as being due to the fact that these launches were becoming routine and that the webcasts are no longer needed. This was a little odd given that they had a webcast for the Friday launch attempt. Yes, they are a private company and this is a commercial activity, so they have every right to do this. But that does not mean its the smart thing to do.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is a dumb thing to do and thats from me  Robert G. Oler</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
