SPACE.com reports that the White House has threatened to consider vetoing the NASA budget bill unless the agency’s requested funding levels are restored. Specifically, Josh Bolten, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote to House Appropriations Committee chairman Rep. C. W. Bill Young (R-FL), telling him the cuts made earlier in the week by the VA-HUD subcommittee were “unacceptable” and would cause the President’s senior advisors to recommend a veto. The letter was dated July 22, the same day that O’Keefe also wrote Young.
While space advocates are doubtless rejoicing at the idea of a president threatening a veto unless NASA’s budget is increased, an actual veto seems quite unlikely. NASA’s budget is part of a larger budget bill (about six times larger than NASA’s budget) that includes funds for the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Housing and Urban Development. Once can imagine the spin, say, the Democrats would put on the veto of that budget bill. Instead, this letter seems to be more of a negotiating tactic: a subtle reminder to Congress that the White House is paying attention to the progress of NASA’s proposed budget.
Update 7 pm: An Orlando Sentinel article provides some well-needed perspective on the belief that the White House is motivated by the cuts in NASA’s budget alone:
Bolten also objected to the committee’s decisions to fund the AmeriCorps program at less than the president’s request and the lack of any money for a prisoner education program that was part of the proposed HUD budget.
“If the final version of this bill that is presented to the president does not include adequate funding levels for presidential initiatives, his senior advisers would recommend that he veto the bill,” Bolten wrote.
This makes clear that the White House was prompted to send the letter by more than just the cuts in NASA’s budget. In any event, it’s unlikely Bush would veto the budget bill (given the political backlash that would likely come from vetoing a budget bill that supports veterans programs); at the same time, it’s quite possible that Congress, at some point in the budget process, will find more money for NASA and other affected programs.
It is well the White House is paying attention to NASA’s budget progress on Capital Hill. President Bush would do well to remember that he won by the thinnest of margins in November 2000, and only the courts and former Vice President Gore’s concession allowed him to occupy 1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
Space advocates might be a tiny minority of the US populace, but they have much longer memories than most citizens do, particularly where space budgets policy and programs are concerned.I intend to let Bush know he needs to back up his intentions with consistent effort twoards VSE, or it will wither and die like so many other space plans have over the decades since Apollo.
Ultimately, it would be good to take NASA funding out of the HUD-VA spending bill, and have it stand on its own, if it were in concert with a vastly enlarged space advocate community of at least a million, instead of the 150,000 or so it has now. We must enlarge our ranks, or suffer the consequences. And we must learn to sell space to the common man and woman, particularly in the 7 to 35 year old demographic who will be the ones to follow in VSE’s path if we act wisely now, and become master pitchmen for space.
I doubt that Congressional Republicans are going to test either the President’s veto threat or Delay’s threat to keep the bill of the floor, for the reason you describe. Both of them serve as a kind of two by four across the head of the mule (the mule in this case being the appropriators) serving notice that the President is not going to be rolled over.
Washington Post article (registration required)
Proposed NASA Cuts Draw a Veto Threat
The Bush administration has threatened to veto a major spending bill unless Congress reverses proposed cuts in the president’s signature space initiatives to return to the moon…
http://www.washingtonpost.com
Proposed NASA Cuts Draw a Veto Threat
By Dan Morgan and Guy Gugliotta
Saturday, July 24, 2004; Page A12
The Bush administration has threatened to veto a major spending bill unless Congress reverses proposed cuts in the president’s signature space initiatives to return to the moon.
The written warning from White House budget director Joshua B. Bolten marks an unusual departure from administration criticism of rampant congressional spending.
It came late Thursday, just hours after House Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), who disapproves of the proposed cuts, raised his concerns with President Bush and White House Chief of Staff Andrew H. Card Jr. The bill in the White House sights is a $92 billion measure that also includes a $1.2 billion increase in veterans programs in 2005.
Bush made headlines in January when he outlined his “Vision for Space Exploration.” He promised to “extend a human presence across our solar system” with a return to the moon by 2020 and eventual human space travel to Mars.
DeLay, whose newly drawn district includes the Johnson Space Center in Houston, has been one of the plan’s most vocal supporters. In a June 3 speech on the House floor, he acknowledged that funds were tight, but added that “for four decades, America’s mission in space has been one of the surest economic investments the federal government has made. . . . Despite the costs, risks and hardship, we can get there from here.”
Citing budgetary constraints, the House Appropriations Committee on Thursday slashed the administration’s request for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration by $1.1 billion — eliminating $438 million NASA had sought to begin work on a new “crew exploration vehicle” to replace the space shuttle, cutting its request for medical and biological research in space by $103 million, and reducing funds sought for lunar exploration by $70 million.
The administration supports an increase of only 1 percent for programs unrelated to defense and counterterrorism. The limit has forced Congress to make tough choices and has led to cuts or outright elimination of a number of presidential initiatives.
Earlier this year, for example, a House spending bill deleted funds for new civics education and art exchange programs that are championed personally by the president and first lady.
Though the White House has expressed disappointment in such actions, there has been no veto threat.
But in this case, Bolton sent a letter to House Appropriations Committee Chairman C.W. Bill Young (R-Fla.) and others, stating that a veto would be recommended unless presidential initiatives receive “adequate funding levels.”
Bolton also complained of cuts in the president’s requests for the Prisoner Re-entry Initiative — which would use faith-based groups to assist released inmates — and the AmeriCorps national service program, a favorite of Laura Bush.
Of most concern were the proposed funding levels for NASA, which “would drastically delay plans for Fiscal Year 2005 critical technology design efforts that are needed to begin to implement the President’s Vision.”
There was no indication, however, that House members charged with drawing up the NASA budget planned to retreat from their decision.
Rep. James T. Walsh (R-N.Y.), who chairs the Appropriations subcommittee responsible for NASA, said in a statement that: “Our committee was given an extremely tight allocation this year, and it met its number one priority to increase veterans healthcare funding as authorized in the Budget Resolution passed by the House. Our goal was to create a fair bill, and I believe that we did.”
Other members of Congress have suggested that flagging interest in the space initiatives by the Bush administration itself made the programs a logical target for cuts, given overall budget constraints.
“The president marketed this as a bold proposal, but has only espoused it one time,” said Rep. Alan P. Mollohan (D-W.Va.), ranking minority member of the House Appropriations subcommittee that oversees NASA. “His silence since the initial proposal is deafening.”