Congress, NASA

“Mikulski Miracle” dead in conference?

There has been a lot of speculation (okay, rumors) the last couple of days about the fate of the so-called “Mikulski Miracle”, the $1 billion the Senate added to NASA’s FY08 appropriations, as the conference committee works out the differences between the House and Senate versions of the Commerce, Justice, and Science appropriations bills. This morning, during the hearing of the space subcommittee of the Senate Commerce Committee, Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who had been working with Sen. Barbara Mikulski on such a measure since last year, appeared to indicate that the extra billion had been dropped from the conference report: “Of course, you know, I, along with Sen. Mikulski, tried to put one billion into this year’s appropriation which, at this point, does not appear to be successful in the conference committee.”

(Space News also filed a report about Hutchison’s comments [subscription required] this morning.)

If that’s correct, and the extra billion has been dropped from the final version of the legislation, it would be a setback to NASA supporters. However, given that the appropriations bill stands a good chance of being vetoed by the president, it’s was going to be an uphill fight to get that extra money even if the money survived the conference committee. The question now is: what happens if/when the bill is vetoed? Will there be another opportunity to increase the agency’s budget, or will it have to fight to keep the money it currently has?

3 comments to “Mikulski Miracle” dead in conference?

  • “Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, who had been working with Sen. Barbara Mikulski on such a measure since last year, appeared to indicate that the extra billion had been dropped from the conference report: ‘Of course, you know, I, along with Sen. Mikulski, tried to put one billion into this year’s appropriation which, at this point, does not appear to be successful in the conference committee.'”

    Surprise, surprise…

    I’ll give Mikulski and Hutchison’s staff credit for getting the $1 billion increase into the final Senate spending bill. I didn’t think it would survive a floor vote, but they managed to find a way around that floor vote.

    But the fact that they had to avoid a floor vote to get the amendment into the bill indicates that this amendment, and associated calls for a White House summit, were always a goofy and ineffective strategy for boosting NASA’s funding. It is not surprising that the House did not go along with it in conference.

    “The question now is: what happens if/when the bill is vetoed? Will there be another opportunity to increase the agency’s budget, or will it have to fight to keep the money it currently has?”

    Anything is possible, but logically it’s going to be the latter. Bush is threatening to veto the bill because it’s spending too much, not too little.

    FWIW…

  • Why can’t Congress present a bill only for NASA? The extra billion is fully justified as repayment for Columbia and Katrina costs.

  • Mike Fazan

    Why can’t Congress present a bill only for NASA? The extra billion is fully justified as repayment for Columbia and Katrina costs.

    Because NASA is at the bottom of the list of national prioritities, and not many people outside of the small Space Geek Universe give a s**t about it. But seriously, it is in NASA’s interest to piggyback with other bills and legislative funding measures. Alone, it would be a visible and vulnerable target.

Leave a Reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>