For teachers in space, political preschool

Last night several organizations co-hosted a “Teachers in Space” roundtable at George Washington University. The idea behind Teachers in Space, unlike NASA’s Teacher in Space program in the 1980s and the current group of educator astronauts, is to fly current teachers on suborbital spaceflights using any number of commercial vehicles currently under development, then get the teachers back in the classroom so they can share their experience—and, presumably, enthusiasm—with their students. Most of the panel discussion focused on the benefits of the program as well as the history of NASA’s past teacher-in-space efforts.

The roundtable came after three days of Congressional staff briefings by several people affiliated with Teachers in Space. Project manager Ed Wright said that they held several dozen briefings and were pleased with the results; he cited one hour-long briefing earlier in the day with a Congressional fellow who was particularly excited about the concept.

Right now, though, Teachers in Space isn’t seeking any specific legislation or federal funding. Wright said that they did get some commitments of support, up to offers to introduce legislation on the issue if needed, and also got feedback on how to win federal funding to help support this project. (Teachers in Space has several flights donated to it by several vehicle providers, and has also arranged a purchase of flights from XCOR Aerospace.) One earlier proposal called for funding flights of 500 teachers a year: one from each Congressional district plus several dozen others.

Charles Miller, president of Space Policy Consulting, said that it might still be too soon to pursue specific initiatives like that. “If you started a Teachers in Space program right now, 500 teachers per year, it would change how the Hill perceives risk,” he said. “They would probably try to put more burdensome regulations on the emerging industry, which is not ready for it, because you’re protecting the teachers.” He expected that in the next few years, once suborbital vehicles begin flying, and flying safely, that teachers, perhaps supported by funding from Congress, will soon follow. “It may not be the right idea right now, but within the next five years, they [Congress] could see it being the right idea,” Miller said.

4 comments to For teachers in space, political preschool

  • Bob Mahoney

    Why not implement a program that puts teachers on roller coasters? Same basic experience for less risk, same minimal gain for less expense.

  • Chance

    In many schools the AP physics classes already go on field trips to amusement parks, specifically to link the fun of the rides to the physics and engineering involved in them. So, your sarcasm falls a little flat.

    In any event, I’m not sure why there would be a rush of legislation to protect teachers on sub orbital spaceflights. If a commercial suborbital flight kills its passengers, it won’t make much difference if they are teachers or millionaires to the regulators. I suppose he’s suggesting there would be more public outcry if a teacher is killed, but I don’t find that argument persuasive.

  • […] Space Politics ยป For teachers in space, political preschool […]

  • I’ve been on rollercoasters, and I’ve been on a Zero-G flight. There is very little parity between the two as far as experiences go. Flying teachers on Zero-G flights is a brilliant idea, maybe I’ll go into teaching so that I can get another ride. Students need to be riding as well so that they can, like, totally share the experience with their friends.

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>