Other, Pentagon

NOAA and DOD highlights

The FY2012 budget proposal includes $1 billion for the Joint Polar Satellite System, the NOAA/NASA successor to the NPOESS satellite program. The funding, if allocated, would be used to “undertake continued development of instrument, spacecraft, and ground segment development to meet launch readiness dates,” the fact sheet summarizing the budget request states. As Space News reports, NOAA requested a similar amount for FY2011 but without an appropriations bill have not received that funding.

NOAA is also requesting $47.3 million to refurbish the Deep Space Climate Observatory (DSCOVR) satellite for a 2013 launch. DSCOVR started life in the late 1990s as Triana, a spacecraft that would provide full-disk images of the Earth from the Earth-Sun L-1 point; it was dubbed “GoreSat” by critics because the program was instigated by then Vice President Al Gore. DSCOVR would now primarily focus on solar observations, providing data to “support timely and accurate forecasts and warnings of geomagnetic storms.”

The budget request also, as expected, includes more money for the EELV program, Space News reports. The $1.76 billion EELV budget for 2012, $450 million more than what the Defense Department previously projected for 2012, would allow the purchase of four more vehicles. That increase, Air Force officials said, is linked to a move to block buying to reduce per-unit costs.

3 comments to NOAA and DOD highlights

  • Beancounter from Downunder

    I wonder when the DoD will decide the EELV program is too expensive and fund an alternative. They don’t have to fund an entire clean sheet system since all the SpaceX F9 (which is quite a bit less expensive than any of the EELv’s) requires is their Merlin 2 but that’s a big job and doesn’t appear to be on their current horizon just yet.

  • VirgilSamms

    Have to get the taxpayers to build that “Merlin 2″ I guess. Then he can charge us for using it.

  • Byeman

    “I wonder when the DoD will decide the EELV program is too expensive and fund an alternative.’

    Never. It isn’t “too” expensive”. Not anymore than Titan IV, Atlas II and Delta II.

    F9 can’t do most of the DOD missions and it is not a given that it would be any better

Leave a Reply




You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>