Congress

House committee to look at suborbital spaceflight and astronaut artifacts next week

Next week, just before the House is scheduled to recess until after the nominating conventions, the House Science Committee is planning to take up a couple of space-related issues. On Wednesday, August 1, the committee’s space subcommittee will hold a hearing on “The Emerging Commercial Suborbital Reusable Launch Vehicle Market”. Representatives of three suborbital vehicles developers—Blue Origin, Virgin Galactic, and XCOR Aerospace—and others will testify about the industry. It’s not clear if this is tied to any planned legislation or is instead more of a fact-funding hearing.

The following day, the full committee will markup up legislation regarding ownership of astronaut artifacts. The bill, HR 4158, would confer onto astronauts of the Mercury, Gemini, and Apollo programs ownership of any “expendable item” used on those missions that are now in the possession of the astronauts, as well as “other expendable, disposable, or personal-use items” they used. (Lunar material is specifically excluded from the bill.) The chairman of the House Science Committee, Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), introduced the legislation in March after a couple of incidents where former astronauts tried to sell such items but were stopped by NASA, which argued that those items were still federal property.

14 comments to House committee to look at suborbital spaceflight and astronaut artifacts next week

  • amightywind

    I haven’t seen any activity in this ‘emerging market’ since 2005. Let’s get on the stick, fellas.

  • E.P. Grondine

    Sometimes Congress moves very slowly.
    Its long past time for that second piece of legislation to be passed.
    Will any of the seized property be returned ?
    Legal fees refunded?
    Apologies issued?

  • Heinrich Monroe

    The idea that astronauts can’t control, and perhaps sell their own mementos is one that comes out of human spaceflight as some kind of sacred activity. This goes hand in hand with the glorification of astronauts as being some kind of saints whose footsteps we kiss, and whose helmets we bow down to. There’s a lot of that around, and I don’t buy any of it. They’re brave people, but there are a lot of brave people. NASA can’t allow astronauts to pawn these items because, well, saints don’t go to pawn shops. To NASA, such activity detracts from the glorification of the profession. But to the extent the astronauts engage in activity that demeans the profession, well, it’s just their own legacy they’re messing with.

  • Vladislaw

    amightywind wrote:

    “I haven’t seen any activity in this ‘emerging market’ since 2005″

    Virgin Galatic has not did any drop tests since 2005?
    They have not did any feathered drop tests since 2005?
    The FAA has not issued any new licenses since 2005?
    They have not had any engine tests since 2005?
    They haven’t sold anymore seats for rides since 2005?
    The SpaceShip Company has not been hiring any people since 2005?
    XCOR has not ran a single test since 2005?

    Wow .. thanks Windy for the info. Glad you can keep us informed with such up to date info.

  • Vladislaw

    “NASA can’t allow astronauts to pawn these items because, well, saints don’t go to pawn shops.”

    Better they have to dig in dumpsters behind a McDonald’s and keep those items rather than let true space geeks put them in collections. Yep, keep them gathering dust in an attic.

  • niksus

    Vladislaw wrote @ July 26th, 2012 at 2:13 pm
    “Virgin Galatic has not did any drop tests since 2005?”
    You said it yourself – they DID tests. But they didn’t fly anything or anyone for $. Sold seats? What crazy people did buy something that’s not delivered even once? Maybe you meant prepayment (20k$ approx).- that’s not sales.
    Hiring people, licenses issued, PR blogs/articles, drop test aren’t real flights, give no profit and Vrigin Galactic is not engineering company which do tests, but commercial transportation entity who must fly and earn $. SO they didn’t achieve anything at the moment as commercial company (=profit or sales). Before you give “info” try to find facts.

  • That_NASA_Engineer_at_KSC

    About those Warehouse 13 artifacts – it seems odd the legislation would only target astronauts, not employees in general, and also just the pre-Apollo Soyuz Test Project (1975) era. While I would guess that later astronauts had some clearer written agreements in place that indirectly address this issue of property, and what’s “proper”, the legislation as written is just begging to leave future issues unaddressed.

    This is a close cousin to the issue of the reselling of Oscar Awards. The difference being the Federal government can actually provide an enforcement action that is the seizure of the property from any party, first or third party, etc. (not an option that’s been available to the Academy). (see http://www.forbes.com/2006/03/01/oscars-black-market_cx_lr_0301blackmarketoscars.html )

  • Vladislaw

    niksus… you are talking total nonsense.

    Windy didn’t predicate his comment on completed vehicles making commerical flights.

    He stated “any activity”. When you are talking about companies in a new sector or field having no activity you are talking about companies that only have a front office with no one working in it and they have an answering machine and a PO box. They are not investing, they are not building, they are not testing .. they are generally not even producing power point presentations.

    These companies ARE freakin active, they are hiring, they are building, they are testing. … in any kind of definition you want to use .. that is called A C T I V I T Y.

    Let me get this straight, you own a company, you talk to a potential customer and they hand you a check for 20k and you wouldn’t call that sales activity? Sheesh.

    So when spacex sells launches and takes a deposit for a future launch .. that isn’t a sale either?

  • DCSCA

    Really…. about the only thing they need to keep track of are lunar samples. (That’d gone well, eh?!) Who cares about these guys peddling some half-eaten bags of bacon bits, a few pens, pencils, a checklist or two or a few personal mementos. The market is very small and the geeks who buy ‘em are suckers. There are people in this world who actually spent good money to purchase individual bricks from Lucille Ball’s house, too.

  • DCSCA

    @That_NASA_Engineer_at_KSC wrote @ July 27th, 2012 at 8:53 am

    In so far as ‘artifacts’ go, what’s the point of paying to store the pieces of Apollo 1 in a Virgina warehouse for 45 years, or fragments of shuttles in silos and hangers… etc.,. Ship all this stuff off to the Smithsonian for display, storage.

    “This is a close cousin to the issue of the reselling of Oscar Awards.”

    LOL Good luck w/that. Personally saw an Academy Award years ago in a famous street market in London for sale– just $150. Space artifacts will show up in places like that, too. A lot of ‘stuff’ has already made its way into space center area garage sales from retired NASA folks cleaning house as well as hardware elements in Florida junkyards.

  • amightywind

    These companies ARE freakin active, they are hiring, they are building, they are testing. … in any kind of definition you want to use .. that is called A C T I V I T Y.

    Back in 2004 I watched the daring Mike Melville and his Spaceship One corkscrew into the outer atmosphere and land with great skill. What an amazing performance! We are now into our 9th year after that flight. Everyone is still yakkin’. How pathetic. I guess Burt Rutan must not be fully involved anymore. Progress has been indeed disappointing.

  • Vladislaw

    Burt Rutan has turned over most of that because he is working on the Stratolauncher now, or at least what the press reported.

    He said that after the win for the X prize, he thought Branson would have the original system upgraded just a bit and fly just two passangers as experimental rides right away while the next system was being developed. He sounded disappointed when he was talking about it that Branson want a much bigger one first.

  • Burt Rutan has turned over most of that because he is working on the Stratolauncher now, or at least what the press reported.

    Burt is pretty much retired. His showing up at the StratoLaunch PR event was clearly just for PR. Virgin has been delayed both because of the decision to build a bigger vehicle, and the decision to use a hybrid motor for it, which turned out to not be as easy or safe as they thought it would. XCOR was delayed for lack of funding, but that problem has been solved, and they should be flying next year.

  • The process of car shopping can be lengthy. You have so many options, not to mention things to
    consider as you compare each one. You will be able to make the right decision if you know enough about car shopping.
    Here are some great tips on buying a car.

Leave a Reply to Heinrich Monroe Cancel reply

  

  

  

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>